Ottawa exempts Syrian refugees from loan repayment

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,142
8,151
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Ottawa exempts Syrian refugees from loan repayment



OTTAWA — The federal Liberal government said Thursday that it will exempt Syrian refugees from a rule that can burden impoverished newcomers with loans of up to $10,000 upon arrival.

Critics say the government should expand that privilege to all asylum-seekers so they’re not forced to pay for the cost of their own flight to freedom.

A statement from Citizenship and Immigration Canada said many fleeing Syrian refugees have “lost everything” and will lack financial resources “for some time” after arriving in Canada.

“Given the extreme and unprecedented hardships faced by this community, Canada is upholding its humanitarian tradition by offering help and protection to those most in need,” the statement said. “This includes waiving the issuance and repayment of immigration loans … and covering the cost of immigration medical examinations and transportation loans.”

Refugee aid groups were informed by federal officials on Wednesday that the 25,000 Syrian refugees slated to enter Canada by the end of February won’t be charged for their flights and medical exams.

They are normally required to cover those costs under a cost-recovery policy in place since 1951.

Two B.C. opposition MPs and refugee advocacy groups endorsed the decision. But they said the Liberals should recognize the charge is an unfair burden for all people fleeing persecution.

“The principle of fairness should apply,” said New Democrat Jenny Kwan, the MP for Vancouver East.

Refugees typically receive income support at the level of provincial welfare rates, she said, making the loan a huge burden.

Conservative MP Dianne Watts, who as Surrey mayor unsuccessfully lobbied the Harper government to waive the charge, also said it didn’t go far enough.

“I think it’s a bigger issue than just one group of people,” Watts, who was speaking as an individual MP and not for the Tory caucus, said in an interview. “I’m glad to hear they’re not going to be charged the transportation loan. That’s a move in right direction, but that policy needs to apply to all refugees.”

Watts said in a 2011 interview while she was mayor that refugee families in Surrey were already facing enormous stress finding housing, employment, and in many cases language-training and psychological counselling.

The added burden of a hefty loan adds to family stress that often results in teenagers in those families becoming ideal recruiting targets for gang leaders, said Watts, who represents South Surrey-White Rock in Parliament.

However, Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel said the caucus supports the loan and repayment program. She pointed out that there’s a 91-per-cent repayment rate, and that there are flexible arrangements for refugees having trouble making payments.

“It’s been a successful program.”

She added that she’s reserving judgment on McCallum’s decision on not charging the 25,000 Syrian refugees until she sees more details.

The Canadian Council for Refugees issued a statement that echoed the views of Kwan and Watts.

“The transportation loan debt is a major burden for resettled refugees, causing many of them immense hardship and impeding their ability to successfully integrate in Canada,” said spokeswoman Janet Dench.

She said refugees will also be more productive contributors to the economy if they aren’t preoccupied with debt repayment immediately after arrival.

“We hope that this decision will be a step toward reviewing the transportation loan for all refugees.”

Chris Friesen, speaking for the Immigrant Services Society of B.C., said a program designed to reflect Canada’s humanitarian values shouldn’t be charging any refugees feeling persecution.

“This nail should be put in the coffin of this program for every refugee coming into this country.”

The government’s Immigration Loans Program provides up to $110 million a year, and has a 91-per-cent payback rate.

Refugees can take up to six years to pay, depending on the loan amount, and the interest rate this year was 1.38 per cent. In some instances loans are interest-free for one to three years.

source: Ottawa exempts Syrian refugees from loan repayment

.........................................

Eh! Not to worry, the budget will balance itself..

 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
OTTAWA — The federal Liberal government said Thursday that it will exempt Syrian refugees from a rule that can burden impoverished newcomers with loans of up to $10,000 upon arrival.
That $250M doesn't get sent back to ISIS and CO, it get pumped back into the local economies, most likely in real-estate sales as that would be a decent down payment in a slumping economy. 1-3 years interest free on a 25 year mortgage would be gained back during the term of the contract.

If that fence is part of her land the dumpy woman from cow-town should be applying for a whole village move to her place and a new ATCO trailer. That covers 3 threads and why didn't you see it as a good plan for whoever takes them in. A widow with 11teen kids, $120k, decent down payment on 12 sections of land under current homesteading laws.
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
The refugees would not have paid back their costs anyway so what does it matter?
Funny thing though, students are expected to pay back their student loans.

If refugees will be buying $250,000 dollar homes where will they be getting the money? And why couldn't they just as well contribute some payment toward the costs of their good fortune which is now being paid for by taxpayers?

The Government is going away too far with their generosity! Safety and the necessities of life are the needs of refugees NOT every damned luxury that so many of the hard working Canadian people cannot afford for themselves.

I know it's hard for a guy who's lived on a trust fund all his life to understand how the 'common people' have to struggle for a living. And to enjoy spending like a drunken sailor. But Jeez! Give us a break!
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Ottawa exempts Syrian refugees from loan repayment

OTTAWA — The federal Liberal government said Thursday that it will exempt Syrian refugees from a rule that can burden impoverished newcomers with loans of up to $10,000 upon arrival.

Critics say the government should expand that privilege to all asylum-seekers so they’re not forced to pay for the cost of their own flight to freedom.

source: Ottawa exempts Syrian refugees from loan repayment
Well, perhaps Parliament should pay any costs related to the refugees loans then instead of Canadians paying.
Freakin politicians anyways. They all think that gov't revenue flows from magic rivers.

Eh! Not to worry, the budget will balance itself..
Budget smudget.
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
Well, perhaps Parliament should pay any costs related to the refugees loans then instead of Canadians paying.
Freakin politicians anyways. They all think that gov't revenue flows from magic rivers.

Budget smudget.

But where does Parliament get it's money? From Canadians, of course!
The word 'budget' is a joke in politics. 'Budget' for ordinary Canadians means making ends meet on your income. For my family it means that when costs in one area go up we have to cut back in another area to keep the books balanced.
But we don't have the privilege of spending other people's money that the politicians have.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I'm confused. We've been told by the progressive extremists here that the refugees will be an economic benefit.

If so, why would there be any need for debt forgiveness, if they're going to be joining the work force and boosting the economy?
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
The $250M that will be donated gets put back into the same economy it comes out of when it is above board. You would have to sneak some in and pay them under the table (and a lot more than $10k) At least with Muslim women and kids and a few fathers it won't be going to the CIA controlled crack dealers or liquor store. We didn't do the Indians any favors by selling the rot-gut booze in the first place yet the trend continues. Want to be the 'schooling' isn't all that much different from the RCC Residential Schools but booze and drugs will be promoted as being what homeless people want to do with their lives.

I doubt AB will resurrect the oil patch so they have jobs. Perhaps the newcomers won't mind being potato farmers. (eating and homemade wodka for those people that do have a tolerance to booze)

Don't like potatoes bear?
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I'm confused. We've been told by the progressive extremists here that the refugees with be an economic benefit.

If so, why would there be any need for debt forgiveness, if they're going to be join the work force and boost the economy?
In AB after the war the Social Credit eliminated all personal loans. What it did was put them all into one account owned by the Govt and it was paid off with interest over time. That is what the Heritage Trust Fund was all about. Notice funds were still taken from the tax-payers even after the loan was repaid in full.

With these 'gifts' rather than 'interest free loans' will go the same route and it will be accepted by Muslims as being 'proper'. When they 'purchase something on credit' the interest is included in the 'sticker price' unlike the Christian method of selling it cheaper and then adding in the same amount of interest so the banks take the heat rather than the merchants.

You might as well get to know the enemy that you are controlled by. Example, the collective here isn't that hard (to figure out) as they are all followers rather than policy makers.

Oh yeah, that move by the SC make the the 'untouchables' with the voters for about 20 years so even if they had paid for the loans out of their own pockets it would have been well worth it.

Canada spent $1B in just security in Toronto for the last meeting of the 'elites' when they could have had it at Cold Lake for under $1M. The $25- going to the women and kids is actually chump change.

I've said before that they should forgive only the interest; as per sharia law;-) ...only on a one time basis......
Time the collective was paying you teacher fees.

If that is to be spent on a home that costs 400K over 30 years then the amount the former owner gets is about $300k and the other goes for interest. A Muslim will see the selling price as the 400 and then 0 interest paid. The world bank (rather than Govt of Canada) still gets their pound of flesh.



What's the matter bear, don't like be educated by DaSleeper?
 
Last edited:

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
< Bafflegab has been edited since it don't make sense...well most of it>

If that is to be spent on a home that costs 400K over 30 years then the amount the former owner gets is about $300k and the other goes for interest. A Muslim will see the selling price as the 400 and then 0 interest paid. The world bank (rather than Govt of Canada) still gets their pound of flesh.
People are talking about an original one time only $10,000. loan....
Learn to read..........
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I know how to read, that is how I could tell you were trying to teach the collective something.

(Unlike the red bear who can only play with the pictures)
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I wish that would have happened when I was paying off my student loan.
Gaddafi would have provided a university education in your chosen field and if you didn't find a job you would get 50% of the income, you were also given a house when you got married, Shall I go on on what Muslims (prefer) do with their money??

Hey hows bout forgiving the interest on my mortgage?
It would probable go up now that income taxes revenue is down to a trickle.

you're nuts!
That isn't the same as being wrong.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
where are those so-called "compassionate conservatives" in this thread?