Last night's news reported the cost revealed at 6 billion +.
Transportation to be by chartered jet.
Those were the latest Liberal declarations. But I suppose they could change.
Last night's news reported the cost revealed at 6 billion +.
Transportation to be by chartered jet.
Those were the latest Liberal declarations. But I suppose they could change.
anyone who thinks that shiny pony has the circuits to lead is a retard. it's mccallum, butts and wynne.
have a sunny day though.
Last night's news reported the cost revealed at 6 billion +.
Transportation to be by chartered jet.
Those were the latest Liberal declarations. But I suppose they could change.
There is no fun in that. And besides,it gives you the chance to pretend that you aren't childish at times and are better than everyone else.no no, you see... pointing out that most of the drivel posted around here is simply an insult fest... that's an attempt to instill self-moderation. Again, try it... you might like it. Try posting for a few days where you don't actually include some infantile cutesy insult derivative of a member's name... think you can?
Debatable.damnit... I am not a turnip!!! :lol:
This is a lucky break. I still believe we look after our own homeless first. Lots of families do not earn a living wage so they live on the streets.Just one broken campaign promise after another. Reality bites.
Yes, but gov't estimates seem to be overbalanced on the conservative side as a rule.
Can you explain why without using a lot of ifs?That's peanuts when you consider the value gained by bringing in these immigrants.
Yes, but gov't estimates seem to be overbalanced on the conservative side as a rule.
I think it was Galbraith that said that the main job of economists was in explaining why their previous predictions were not correct.
Can you explain why without using a lot of ifs?
Can you explain why without using a lot of ifs?
Can you explain why without using a lot of ifs?
Bringing in immigrants makes immigration good. Oh yeah, good explanation. :roll:Um...immigration good
Easily.can you explain why you're so anti-immigration... without using a lot of ifs?
I can accept that, sure.Can you accept that without the existing migratory impact/increase, natural increases are not enough... will not be enough to sustain population growth and support for the social network/fabric current Canadians so rely upon?
Bringing in immigrants makes immigration good. Oh yeah, good explanation. :roll:.
I have tried and cannot find anything that comes close to accounting for all the known, let alone the known plus the possible variables. The best I have been able to do is view relatively short-term fiscal benefits vs detriments.Oops, I knew I didn't dumb it done enough for you. Bringing immigrants in makes more than it costs. You should try google sometime. It's all there.
Good thing immigrants are a net benefit for the economy. Without that there wouldn't be any reason whatsoever to help fellow human beings.
Canada cannot seem to help a lot of Canadians.Good thing immigrants are a net benefit for the economy. Without that there wouldn't be any reason whatsoever to help fellow human beings.
Do we need population growth ?can you explain why you're so anti-immigration... without using a lot of ifs? Can you accept that without the existing migratory impact/increase, natural increases are not enough... will not be enough to sustain population growth and support for the social network/fabric current Canadians so rely upon?
Canada cannot seem to help a lot of Canadians.
You can help 'em best by kicking their butts out of the government benefit office and telling 'em to get jobs, gol-dang it!Do you think Canada should help Canadians? Which Canadians? How?
Again, I have tried and cannot find anything that comes close to accounting for all the known, let alone the known plus the possible variables. Did you not understand?Read post number 71 and then try Google