Paris attacks
- Thread starter Mowich
- Start date
Seems they were warned about this..
Islamic state in July 2015: ‘We will fill the streets of Paris with dead bodies’
Islamic state in July 2015: ‘We will fill the streets of Paris with dead bodies’
42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks
Governments from Around the World Admit They Do It
There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.
In the following 42 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admits to it, either orally or in writing:
(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.
(30) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
(31) Similarly, the U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction (despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers).
42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks Washington's Blog
Governments from Around the World Admit They Do It
There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.
In the following 42 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admits to it, either orally or in writing:
(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.
(30) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
(31) Similarly, the U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction (despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers).
42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks Washington's Blog
Yeah, like average Canadians are struggling to make ends meet and we are worried about affordable housing for refugees. No worries, let's just tax the middle class.
If Justin persists with bringing 25,000 refugees in, in one fell swoop, the problems that will evolve here will make Paris seem like a kid's spat in the sandbox! For one thing, there's a huge shortage of doctors and nurses here right now, so how are they to handle another 25 thousand? The entire charade is insanity! How many terrorists will we be welcoming?
My guess would be Assad and ISIS. My opinions are based mainly on the Math, cliffy. There's a little more to it than just "putting another potato in the pot". If caring for them is such a simple task, why can't we help our own people? What's the rationale in bringing in 25,000? Why not 500 to start with and see how that works? I'll be totally amazed if we get 25,000 who are all exactly as they seem.
Like Gaddafi and many others vilified by the western media and governments, Assad is not the bad guy he is made out to be. These refugees are running from the destruction of their country by the US and their allies, including Canada. They are probably not even aware that they are running to the enemy, they have been told so many lies, just like us. It doesn't take very much research to figure out the real reason the US wants to get rid of Assad.
Pretty much.
And there's that whole full coverage healthcare thing. While many in the middle class can't find a family doctor or afford their meds.
But JT's is all about the middle class.
No one really considers you and Flossy part of the general population.
I did and couldn't find anything like what he said attributed to stephen king.
Maybe since you know everything and you stuck your nose in the convo, and he never answered me, you can answer for him?
Assad is a bad guy, but the problem with Syria is that there are a few different groups of 'bad guys' and it becomes increasingly difficult for the good guys to get a firm read on the situation.