The restaurant hired them. Must not have been very smart business people eh?
Is it really that simple? Can't we confuse the issue with just a little anti-immigration rhetoric?
Toronto restaurant violated Muslim men's human rights
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
The restaurant hired them. Must not have been very smart business people eh?
Is it really that simple? Can't we confuse the issue with just a little anti-immigration rhetoric?
Do you really believe they are legally not allowed to hire them? If they were not hired, they no doubt would be able to sue for discriminatory hiring practices.
Human rights tribunals generally are not picked for their knowledge of law but their dedication to the cause.
We never did find out the outcome of the muslim barber refusing to cut a lesbian woman's hair....
Lucky for the CHRC the two parties resolved the problem themselves huh?
Muslim barbers and woman whose hair they wouldn’t cut resolve dispute with ‘a good talk’ | Toronto Star
Wouldn't surprise me if the CHRC paid them both to keep it under wraps.....
That's right! Minorities have you coming and going. The reason Human Rights Commissions were set up is because the courts couldn't handle the numbers of 'racial discrimination' cases coming before them. Those cases included discriminatory hiring practices, wrongful dismissals, racial slurs, etc.
Common sense in hiring the right person for the job no longer applies. It's pretty much 'first come, first served" now with regard to race, religion, culture and in some cases even ability!
I don't know what the magic number is, but I know that companies that hire large numbers of people have to fill a quota of 'minorities' even if none are qualifies, they have to be taken on.
Right, he had to pay $100,000 to inept ****heads who knew damn well what a chef's job entails. Naturally the courts sided with the scam artists instead of holding them accountable for taking jobs they knew they wouldn't be able to perform fully. All you're doing is defending them with typical lefty nonsense, "No one is responsible for their actions or choices. It's always someone else's fault". Unless you're a conservative of course.
It's the exact same left-tard logic that states a criminal can become a victim while in the process of committing a crime, so I can truly understand your confusion.
Clearly the inept one was the one that hire somebody unable to do the job required (if that is, in fact, the case)
No, what I'm doing is making fun of you because you don't want to hold the business manager accountable for his actions. That's just typical lefty nonsense. You probably voted NDP, didn't you?
I think the only one confused here is you. On one hand you want people held accountable for their decisions and on the other, you don't.
Why would you hire someone who is inept if you were using common sense?
The only 'inept' ones are the ones making the ridiculous laws.
I have common sense so I wouldn't hire somebody unwilling or incapable of doing the job required. An inept manager may