Please excuse me while I roll on the floor laughing.
Maybe not as funny as you think! Many Russians also live on huge expanses of prairie (steppes) and grow wheat.
Lucidity doesn't visit you very often does it?
It's like are in a different time-zone.Probably... and are nothing at all like Canadians.
Time for your pills
Would you rather it be Israel and the rulers of that place?
It's like are in a different time-zone.
What a load of bollocks. Soft-spoken? I guess, if you consider being punched in the face while being spoken to is "soft". Friendly? Maybe the average Russian citizen, but the idiots running the show? Not. Competent? Apprently building a nuclear reactor with major design flaws and installing technicians and supervisors with insufficient nuclear training is "competent". Trustworthy? Uh...no. Respectful of international law? Not really. But then they aren't the only ones. Your last sentence is amusing though. I guess Afghanistan was just a Soviet training exercise.I'll admit that I like Russia's style. Soft-spoken, friendly, competent, trustworthy, respectful of international law (or can at least overwhelmingly win a referendum when it doesn't), and doesn't fight a war it doesn't know with certainty beforehand that it can win efficiently.
What a load of bollocks. Soft-spoken? I guess, if you consider being punched in the face while being spoken to is "soft". Friendly? Maybe the average Russian citizen, but the idiots running the show? Not. Competent? Apprently building a nuclear reactor with major design flaws and installing technicians and supervisors with insufficient nuclear training is "competent". Trustworthy? Uh...no. Respectful of international law? Not really. But then they aren't the only ones. Your last sentence is amusing though. I guess Afghanistan was just a Soviet training exercise.
As for winning them efficiently, I guess using masses of troops as cannon fodder is a pretty efficient way to pare down your military.
I admit that I am still angry at Russia's illegal incursion into Syria, but how does that compare to the US and the UK providing ISIS with fleets of Toyotas and Canada spending all of that money pretending to be seriously fighting ISIS after all these months?
If we can befriend ISIS-enablers, then we can certainty befriend illegal invaders who were at least welcomed with open arms and an overwhelming referendum show of support to boot.
What a load of bollocks. Soft-spoken? I guess, if you consider being punched in the face while being spoken to is "soft". Friendly? Maybe the average Russian citizen, but the idiots running the show? Not. Competent? Apprently building a nuclear reactor with major design flaws and installing technicians and supervisors with insufficient nuclear training is "competent". Trustworthy? Uh...no. Respectful of international law? Not really. But then they aren't the only ones. Your last sentence is amusing though. I guess Afghanistan was just a Soviet training exercise.
As for winning them efficiently, I guess using masses of troops as cannon fodder is a pretty efficient way to pare down your military.
I admit that I am still angry at Russia's illegal incursion into Syria, but how does that compare to the US and the UK providing ISIS with fleets of Toyotas and Canada spending all of that money pretending to be seriously fighting ISIS after all these months?
If we can befriend ISIS-enablers, then we can certainty befriend illegal invaders who were at least welcomed with open arms and an overwhelming referendum show of support to boot.
Now you're being foolish. If the US and UK are providing ISIS with fleets of Toyotas then so is Canada. Your hands aren't clean brah.