Stephen Harper waging phony jihad on the niqab
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
lol
you will have your holocaust at any price eh
HATE the HATERS???
no, not even that
derisive laughter is all i have for you and your pathetic hate
and all i want is get your PATHETIC RELIGIOUS HATE out of CANADIAN and US POLITICS
Wear your reddie with pride along with the NAZIS your "brothers"
"“I don’t belong [to Svoboda], but I take orders from their team. They know I’m Israeli, Jewish and an ex-IDF soldier. They call me ‘brother,’” he said. “What they’re saying about Svoboda is exaggerated, I know this for a fact. I don’t like them because they’re inconsistent, not because of [any] anti-Semitism issue.”http://www.globalresearch.ca/ukrain...nazi-command-involved-in-maidan-riots/5371725
from the ORIGIAL article in HAARETZ and other ISRAELI papers
there is pictures too for the haters who can't even read
some nice pictures of Nazi salutes and rhetoric from the party the x-idf just helped CANADA and the US install in UKRAINE
The U.S. has Installed a Neo-Nazi Government in Ukraine | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
oh BROTHER
Last edited:
Nice to have a PM that stands up for not only what is right but what Canadians want. Pandering vote buying liberals would have sharia law apply to whoever demanded it in the name of being multi culti and accommodating.
Quite the tin hatter site you get what you think is information from. Does reality scare you?
As a Muslim, I Think Canada Should Ban the Niqab and Burka in Public
As a Muslim mother who never saw a niqab when I was growing up in Karachi, Pakistan, I am astonished to see Canada's judiciary caving in to Islamists who have nothing but contempt for Canada's values of gender equality.
I write this as a Muslim Canadian who does not have any specific political leanings.
But in the 25 years I have called Canada home, I have seen a steady rise of Muslim women being strangled in the pernicious black tent that is passed off to naïve and guilt-ridden white, mainstream Canadians as an essential Islamic practice.
The niqab and burka have nothing to do with Islam.
They're the political flags of the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, al-Qaida and Saudi Arabia.
Now I learn I have not only to fight the medieval, theocratic adherents of my faith for a safe space for myself, I have to battle the Federal Court of Canada as well, which has come out on the side of these face masks.
More: As a Muslim, I Think Canada Should Ban the Niqab and Burka in PublicÂ*|Â*Raheel Raza
As a Muslim mother who never saw a niqab when I was growing up in Karachi, Pakistan, I am astonished to see Canada's judiciary caving in to Islamists who have nothing but contempt for Canada's values of gender equality.
I write this as a Muslim Canadian who does not have any specific political leanings.
But in the 25 years I have called Canada home, I have seen a steady rise of Muslim women being strangled in the pernicious black tent that is passed off to naïve and guilt-ridden white, mainstream Canadians as an essential Islamic practice.
The niqab and burka have nothing to do with Islam.
They're the political flags of the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, al-Qaida and Saudi Arabia.
Now I learn I have not only to fight the medieval, theocratic adherents of my faith for a safe space for myself, I have to battle the Federal Court of Canada as well, which has come out on the side of these face masks.
More: As a Muslim, I Think Canada Should Ban the Niqab and Burka in PublicÂ*|Â*Raheel Raza
The rationale of the statement was clear. He expressed the rationale for prohibiting the wearing of a niqab at citizenship ceremonies. The rationale he seemed to communicate was that the reason we should prohibit the wearing of the niqab at citizenship ceremonies is that he does not force his daughter to wear a niqab. According to that rationale, we should prohibit the wearing of any clothing at citizenship ceremonies that Harper does not force his daughter to wear.
This might not be what he intended to express, but it is what his words seemed to express in the absence of any further explanation.
This might not be what he intended to express, but it is what his words seemed to express in the absence of any further explanation.
What if I was to wear a ski mask at a citizenship ceremony? Don't you think someone might be a bit concerned about who I am?
hamas hates Israel?
"How Israel helped create Hamas"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/07/30/how-israel-helped-create-hamas/
oh look the washington post
its called "controlled opposition"
ironic?
you are too much man
too much
in the future
please trying injecting some truth into your posts maybe
and your point is? It isn't the first time something like this has backfired on a country. It's happened to the U.S., it's happened to Russia(U.S.S.R) and it's happened to Britain. Living by the axiom "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" does not always work out once the "enemy" has been vanquished.
It is you that is "too much". Your narrow and simplistic outlook is symptomatic of others like yourself.
Our home and native downtown Toronto
By EBD on September 25, 2015 2:35 PM | 31 Comments
Poll finds that 82% of Canadians outside of Quebec support ban on niqabs.
National Post headline:
By EBD on September 25, 2015 2:35 PM | 31 Comments
Poll finds that 82% of Canadians outside of Quebec support ban on niqabs.
National Post headline:
As unbelievable as it seems outside Quebec, it looks like niqabs could become a ballot-box issue
I can see Canada from the CN tower.
In 2003, citing security concerns, new government regulations were brought in regarding photo identification.
The move changed an existing law that did not require everyone to have photo ID.
A small religious minority group asked for an exemption, they claimed having their picture taken and the ID card created would violate their strongly held religious beliefs and be a violation of their Charter right to freedom of religion.
The government denied the request, so the religious minority group challenged the new rule in court. They won, then they won on appeal.
That didn’t matter to the government. They had what they believed were valid security reasons to impose this new rule, so they appealed to the Supreme Court and won.
The court said the new regulations did violate the religious freedom guarantee of the Charter -- but that it was a minimal impairment of the right.
That ruling came down in 2009. Did you hear much about it?
From 2003 to 2009, did you hear progressive politicians tripping over themselves to stand up for this threatened religious minority?
Did you hear media commentators call those that wanted to impose this restriction on the religious minority "bigots"?
No, of course you didn’t. Because the small religious minority group were Christians, members of a sect called the Hutterite Brethren. The government in question was the Alberta government, concerned about the security of their driver’s licence system and identity theft in a post-9/11 world.
more edumacation for the kids:
Here's an easy way to spot a pro-niqab hypocrite: Mention the Hutterites - The Rebel
The move changed an existing law that did not require everyone to have photo ID.
A small religious minority group asked for an exemption, they claimed having their picture taken and the ID card created would violate their strongly held religious beliefs and be a violation of their Charter right to freedom of religion.
The government denied the request, so the religious minority group challenged the new rule in court. They won, then they won on appeal.
That didn’t matter to the government. They had what they believed were valid security reasons to impose this new rule, so they appealed to the Supreme Court and won.
The court said the new regulations did violate the religious freedom guarantee of the Charter -- but that it was a minimal impairment of the right.
That ruling came down in 2009. Did you hear much about it?
From 2003 to 2009, did you hear progressive politicians tripping over themselves to stand up for this threatened religious minority?
Did you hear media commentators call those that wanted to impose this restriction on the religious minority "bigots"?
No, of course you didn’t. Because the small religious minority group were Christians, members of a sect called the Hutterite Brethren. The government in question was the Alberta government, concerned about the security of their driver’s licence system and identity theft in a post-9/11 world.
more edumacation for the kids:
Here's an easy way to spot a pro-niqab hypocrite: Mention the Hutterites - The Rebel
Soooo exposing the hypocrisy of left-tards is conbot logic? The deeper subject is covering of the face where identification is a necessity.
I actually remember the story about the Hutterite Brethren and was amused by the sound of crickets chirping from the same group of hypocritical dinguses that are constantly wailing about the rights of muslims being infringed upon.
Darrell Bricker @darrellbricker On Niqab, 85% of Cdns agree on limits at citizenship ceremonies. Can't get 85% of Cdns to agree on just about anything. 1/3
Saying niqab irrelevant implies public doesn't know it's own mind and that what it thinks shouldn't be considered by political leaders.
Tolerance is the defining Cdn value of the 21st century. But, it has it's limits. Niqab a serious test. NOT trivial or irrelevant.