Oh yeah, First you tell the guy "wait a minute" while you check where the glass is, then if he's still there you hit him with the bat:roll:
The Myth of the Good Guy With a Gun
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
Colpy, I'll see your breitbart article :mrgreen: and raise you one from slate: The NRA’s Latest Bald-Faced Lie --- An NRA ad claims 80 percent of police in a poll said background checks will have no effect. That’s a lie.
but hey now, Colpy... what I find most interesting in your linked article are the 2 bills being discussed during that Texas Senate Committee review... related to "campus carry" and "open carry". Does the idea of bringing those gun-carry options back to Canada give you a chubbie? Is that the kind of expanding gun use you really want here in Canada?
now Colpy, I won't resort to your rhetoric level and blowhardiness... you know, I won't say something like you just did, something like, "gun nutters are liars by definition, as the truth does not support their goals". I wouldn't say something like that, as you just did, would I Colpy? Equally, I wouldn't follow your butt-hurtin' lead and state that, as you just did, that the most fanatic anti-control people, on here at least, are really not too bright? But then again, all one has to be around here on this subject... since you're daGunMan, is brighter than you... and that's easy-peasy! :mrgreen:
I'm always on your mind... isn't that right, taxi? :mrgreen: You just can't quit me, can you?
More waldo Bullshyte....
Here is where the NRA got their Data
3.) About 85 percent of officers say the passage of the White House’s currently proposed legislation would have a zero or negative effect on their safety, with just over 10 percent saying it would have a moderate or significantly positive effect.
PoliceOne's Gun Control Survey: 11 key lessons from officers' perspectives
Can't seem to find that pdf file on the web site. It doesn't exist!
Someone better repost what I wrote cause I'm on his ignore list
Last edited:
More waldo Bullshyte....
Here is where the NRA got their Data
3.) About 85 percent of officers say the passage of the White House’s currently proposed legislation would have a zero or negative effect on their safety, with just over 10 percent saying it would have a moderate or significantly positive effect.
PoliceOne's Gun Control Survey: 11 key lessons from officers' perspectives
Can't seem to find that pdf file on the web site. It doesn't exist!
Someone better repost what I wrote cause I'm on his ignore list
(From DaSleeper)
Why bother? Waldo is completely incapable of recognizing the truth, or dealing with any fact that does not fit into his psychotic little mantra..
Here is where the NRA got their Data
3.) About 85 percent of officers say the passage of the White House’s currently proposed legislation would have a zero or negative effect on their safety, with just over 10 percent saying it would have a moderate or significantly positive effect.
PoliceOne's Gun Control Survey: 11 key lessons from officers' perspectives
Can't seem to find that pdf file on the web site. It doesn't exist!
Someone better repost what I wrote cause I'm on his ignore list
(From DaSleeper)
Why bother? Waldo is completely incapable of recognizing the truth, or dealing with any fact that does not fit into his psychotic little mantra..
Last edited:
:mrgreen: talk about a couple of dumb f-cks! The described NRA lie was with respect to background checks! My linked article goes into the details of how the NRA lied about background checks... Colpy, you should have reviewed it yourself instead of just relying on that lil' lapdog DuhSleeper! Geezaz, that lapper is an idiot! (thanks for quoting him as I would have missed yet another example of his stooopidity!... cause I have him ON IGNORE :mrgreen
. But ya, Colpy... is this you, as you say, "recognizing the truth"!!!here's the thing Colpy, there are 2 questions that include a reference to background checks... neither of the totals come anywhere near the 80% figure mentioned in the NRA lie... notwithstanding the problems used in the methodology of that "poll" (as my linked article details). Talk about your, as you say, "psychotic little mantra"!
If I was arguing the other side, I would have a credible response to the ambiguous NRA wording on that TV advertisement, but then for Waldo and the other "Warmists" It would screw up their claim that 97% of all climate scientists agree that man is responsible for the climate on earth...
but then, not all police subscribe to Police one.
This is why, no matter what he or Flossy claim Waldo is not a good debater and neither is Flossy because they will never admit when the other as a point....Waldo deflects and flossy flips out a meme..
Another reason I don't bother with debating on the forum...I would be honor bound to follow the rules while others don't.
Edit: I just noticed he fell for the bait...his linked pdf article doesn't exist on Police One, Try clicking on Police One where it refers to the poll...it doesn't exist.
Last edited:
:mrgreen: talk about a couple of dumb f-cks! The described NRA lie was with respect to background checks! My linked article goes into the details of how the NRA lied about background checks... Colpy, you should have reviewed it yourself instead of just relying on that lil' lapdog DuhSleeper! Geezaz, that lapper is an idiot! (thanks for quoting him as I would have missed yet another example of his stooopidity!... cause I have him ON IGNORE :mrgreen
here's the thing Colpy, there are 2 questions that include a reference to background checks... neither of the totals come anywhere near the 80% figure mentioned in the NRA lie... notwithstanding the problems used in the methodology of that "poll" (as my linked article details). Talk about your, as you say, "psychotic little mantra"!
didn't get in before the allowed edit time... Colpy, here are the 2 questions (#10, #21) in that "poll" that reference background checks. Again, neither of the percentage totals come anywhere near the NRA 80% lie:
Get him to try and link or find his quoted survey on Police One web site. I'll bet he can't"
The actual link source is when you check the properties is
http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/p1_gunsurveysummary_2013.pdf
A "cloud storage hosted by amazon.com
http://whois.domaintools.com/cloudfront.net
Research is a b itch but I didn't want to leave you holding the bag...but Waldo will not admitanything anyway....
Despite the header on the document it begs the question whether that document was ever on Police One.
The actual link source is when you check the properties is
http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/p1_gunsurveysummary_2013.pdf
A "cloud storage hosted by amazon.com
http://whois.domaintools.com/cloudfront.net
Research is a b itch but I didn't want to leave you holding the bag...but Waldo will not admitanything anyway....
Despite the header on the document it begs the question whether that document was ever on Police One.
Last edited:
Get him to try and link or find his quoted survey on Police One web site. I'll bet he can't"
The actual link source is when you check the properties is
http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/...mmary_2013.pdf
A "cloud storage hosted by amazon.com
CloudFront.net WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info - DomainTools
Research is a b itch but I didn't want to leave you holding the bag...but Waldo will not admitanything anyway....
Despite the header on the document it begs the question whether that document was ever on Police One.
From DaSleeper
I'm still not bothering to read Waldo's garbage.
Is he not providing links yet again??
The actual link source is when you check the properties is
http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/...mmary_2013.pdf
A "cloud storage hosted by amazon.com
CloudFront.net WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info - DomainTools
Research is a b itch but I didn't want to leave you holding the bag...but Waldo will not admitanything anyway....
Despite the header on the document it begs the question whether that document was ever on Police One.
From DaSleeper
I'm still not bothering to read Waldo's garbage.
Is he not providing links yet again??
So, given that the two most popular measures for preventing mass shootings are aggressive institutionalisation and more permissive concealed carry for civilians, will you be advocating for these in the future?
my lil' stalker! Again, thank you for your moderation... for your very, very special kind of moderation; the Locutus Brand™!
oh my... are you the lapper DuhSleeper's lil' Toby? :mrgreen: In any case, you dimwits having trouble finding that survey... so... so what? You're claiming it doesn't exist... you're claiming "Police One" never undertook and presented the survey (in all it's big-time methodology failures)? I mean, c'mon guys... this is the NRA lying about background checks within that survey... you gotta rally round the NRA; you just gots ta!
oh wait, what's this? You mean the waldo found that survey on the "Police One" website like in 10 secs! And you fackers couldn't? Guys, guys... check the following screen-shot and compare the .pdf file referenced, this file, to the original one from the linked (slate.com) article I put forward. Let me know if they're not the same!!!
Tecumsehsbones;2070484[B said:
sorry, I'm not American... we don't do concealed carry like your U.S. Gun Culture does! We also have very, very, very limited gun related mass shootings... unlike as is a regular occurrence within your U.S. Gun Culture! Please direct your question to the U.S. wannabe, Colpy!
(notwithstanding the methodology failures of the survey... as outlined in the slate article I previously linked to. Notwithstanding a very limited participation rate, itself from a most selective data group)
.
.
.
more... yes, MORE... NRA lies!
This Is How the NRA Lies to Gun Owners About Obama's Agenda
The National Rifle Association, which thwarted new background check legislation in Congress, recently mailed a "survey" to gun owners with 12 questions related to gun rights, gun laws, and politics. I use scare quotes above because this NRA document (read it here) is a deeply misleading push poll, not an actual survey—and it lies about President Barack Obama's positions on gun control.
The National Rifle Association, which thwarted new background check legislation in Congress, recently mailed a "survey" to gun owners with 12 questions related to gun rights, gun laws, and politics. I use scare quotes above because this NRA document (read it here) is a deeply misleading push poll, not an actual survey—and it lies about President Barack Obama's positions on gun control.
you're visibly upset again chum. here, stare deeply into your guy's eyes and try to come down. :lol:
the most glaring reflection of the drive-by troll is to continually cast "visibly upset / butt hurtin" on another member - well done stalker, well done! :mrgreen:
you're visibly upset again chum. here, stare deeply into your guy's eyes and try to come down. :lol:
Waldo's a Liberal?
LOL!!!
The stupid led by the stupid.
No surprise there..................
you're visibly upset again chum. here, stare deeply into your guy's eyes and try to calm down
The difference here is that waldo sparingly does that, whereas Cons use that strategy frequently.
It's glaringly obvious.
It's glaringly obvious.
Former Toronto Mayor Rob Ford likes cats too.you're visibly upset again chum. here, stare deeply into your guy's eyes and try to calm down