WTF are you talking about?
Please, try to get in touch with reality.
Geezus.
So.....it does not excuse the present day PM's attempts to exercise control over the sexual rights of more than half of the population of Canada. Arrogant b#astard. Any deflections are welcome. Smart women do not trust him!!
Well it seems you have missed the whole battle for women's rights. When I was young, I was refused birth-control pills by two pharmacies and had to go nearly 40 miles for a renewal. Since today, Harper has stated he is against providing birth control as part of relief packages (which has been supplied with Canada's aid for decades) does indicate, in my opinion, how things would go for women in Canada, if he thought for one minute he could get away with it.WTF are you talking about?
Please, try to get in touch with reality.
Geezus.
Well it seems you have missed the whole battle for women's rights. When I was young, I was refused birth-control pills by two pharmacies and had to go nearly 40 miles for a renewal. Since today, Harper has stated he is against providing birth control as part of relief packages (which has been supplied with Canada's aid for decades) does indicate, in my opinion, how things would go for women in Canada, if he thought for one minute he could get away with it.
"2008: Private Member's Bill C-484, the "Unborn Victims of Crime Act," passes Second Reading in Parliament. The bill would have endangered abortion rights by creating fetal personhood. After a national pro-choice campaign against it, the Conservative government withdrew its support for the bill, which died when a federal election was called in October. Bill C-484 was the first anti-abortion bill to ever make it past Second Reading."
"Today: Canadian women in most major centres have access to funded abortion. Medicare pays for abortion in hospitals, and New Brunswick is the only province that continues to refuse to pay for abortions in clinics, in violation of the Canada Health Act and the 1988 Morgentaler decision. Rural women everywhere in Canada still have difficulties with access."
Talk about trying to extend one's control over women everywhere. Never mind, I am sure you would have paid more attention to women's fight for liberty over their bodies, if it had included restrictions on condoms for men....right??
Well it seems you have missed the whole battle for women's rights. When I was young, I was refused birth-control pills by two pharmacies and had to go nearly 40 miles for a renewal. Since today, Harper has stated he is against providing birth control as part of relief packages (which has been supplied with Canada's aid for decades) does indicate, in my opinion, how things would go for women in Canada, if he thought for one minute he could get away with it.
JLM, You should do your homework for sure.
Well it seems you have missed the whole battle for women's rights.
I love how Liberal women want Canadian tax payers to pay for them to have risky sex.
You don't want to get pregnant, cross your bloody legs. Have some personal responsibility for your body as a women, isn't that what you been asking for..
Also, I don't believe women should be able to have an abortion as easy as going to the 7/11 for a slushy.
Should be more restrictive and only in case of rape and health reasons for the mother.
It's funny how Liberals don't want to kill a convicted killer in prison, but find it easy to kill an innocent child with abortion.
Former Liberal MP Carolyn Parrish tweeted the following In 2012:
'Hmm. Eve Adams is a cyborg, built with perfect posture, no feelings and an overwhelming desire to take over the universe.'
'Eve Adams a soul-less, unfeeling, treacherous, self-serving machine. Dimitri Soudas serves a purpose just as Peter Adams, briefly.'
'I will work hard to help anyone who can stop Eve Adams from getting re-elected. Gives politics and women a bad name.'
Something that is Harper's fault.Wonder what Liberal MP Carolyn Parrish will be tweeting now?? :lol:
OMG, it figures.......Well come back with that load of rubbish when science has made enough progress to implant a fetus in a male body to carry and raise. Even that evil book the BIBLE does not recognize fetal tissue as a living being until it takes it's first breath. In my opinion, a human's right to choose the purpose her body will be used, belongs only to them.They don't like it, then we don't need to send any aid. We could use the money here in Canada. Or do you feel that contraception in some 3rd world country is more important than food and shelter for our homeless. Or ensuring that our Children's hospitals have everything they need for the kids in their care?
Far from an anti abortion bill. I can understand though how the selfish and self centered would not want ANYTHING risking their ability to kill baby's willy nilly.
They have access.They may not be able to get a doc to vacuum it out within 10 mins of their front door, but they all do have access.
So, for you abortion is all about birth control. No surprise.
and abortion isn't about "rights", it's about women not willing to take responsibility for their actions. For the men that support the present lack of laws in Canada, it's about them also not willing to take responsibility for their actions.
As for that prejudicial remark about risky behavior, should women refuse marital sex and only indulge if and when she wants children? Maybe, the health care should consider funding vibrators instead. Easy enough to do away with risky behavior right!!
Oh and Boomer, Until a fetus draws it first breath it is not a child, merely a collection of tissue. It is neither innocent nor guilty, as it does not have a functioning brain in the period allowed for abortions.
So uhh, I don't want to dampen the mood of this thread or anything but I think I should mention the pressing issue that a leaked sex tape of Eve going solo would not offend me in the slightest.
Again, I know everyone in here is in good bipartisan spirits and embracing this news with open arms so I duly apologize for spoiling that mood.
No.
As in, imagine she is a double agent, infiltrating the Liberals on behalf of Harper.
where is you're sense of imagination!?!?!
Well it seems you have missed the whole battle for women's rights. When I was young, I was refused birth-control pills by two pharmacies and had to go nearly 40 miles for a renewal. Since today, Harper has stated he is against providing birth control as part of relief packages (which has been supplied with Canada's aid for decades) does indicate, in my opinion, how things would go for women in Canada, if he thought for one minute he could get away with it.
"2008: Private Member's Bill C-484, the "Unborn Victims of Crime Act," passes Second Reading in Parliament. The bill would have endangered abortion rights by creating fetal personhood. After a national pro-choice campaign against it, the Conservative government withdrew its support for the bill, which died when a federal election was called in October. Bill C-484 was the first anti-abortion bill to ever make it past Second Reading."
"Today: Canadian women in most major centres have access to funded abortion. Medicare pays for abortion in hospitals, and New Brunswick is the only province that continues to refuse to pay for abortions in clinics, in violation of the Canada Health Act and the 1988 Morgentaler decision. Rural women everywhere in Canada still have difficulties with access."
Talk about trying to extend one's control over women everywhere. Never mind, I am sure you would have paid more attention to women's fight for liberty over their bodies, if it had included restrictions on condoms for men....right??
So what reality have you existed in for the last 50 to 60 years?
JLM, You should do your homework for sure.