Are scores from the inner city factored in?
You mean the urban heat island effect? ha ha ha
Well that was dumb.
Aren't you guys always complaining about them liberal sceintists over on the AGW pages?
Are scores from the inner city factored in?
Well that was dumb.
You mean the urban heat island effect? ha ha ha
Aren't you guys always complaining about them liberal sceintists over on the AGW pages?
Could you link me up to the studies to which you refer please? Thanks.
Is a scientist who depends on grant funding independent of the person/organization who or which makes the grants?
Other studies shows NPR listeners as the most well informed on world events, and viewers of FOX News the lowest.
Fox News Viewers Uninformed, NPR Listeners Not, Poll Suggests - Forbes
There's a few of them.
In theory perhaps. In practice, not so much.
I'm not impressed.
I don't agree about scientists who depend on grants issued by others because the appearance of bias is just as bad as the existence of bias. No one can trust someone who is dependent on one's enemy. His/her/its representations aren't credible.
Liberals like to think they have a higher consciousness than conservatives and libertarians. Imo that view of superiority is arrogant. I ask you, how can one have a higher level of consciousness and be arrogant at the same time?
There may be others out there. I find that the lines between what constitutes a liberal vs conservatvie to be so blurred to be all that useful. Although I have anecdotally noted a correlation between liberalism and level of education (though that is not necessarily relatd to intelligence). Engineers, though, tend to be more conservative, in my experience.
It's like those studeis of intelligence and race. There are studies indicating blacks score lower than whites score lower than orinetals on IQ tests, but then there is so much controversey around the findings, any measure of objectivity is essentially removed.
I suspect it's true though I don't really care. I just say it now and then for no other reason than to be a troll. There are liberal conservatvies out there (people who are predisposed to liberalism, but brought up in conservatvioe families). And vice versa. That's gonna mess everything up.
I have many friends with phenomenonally high IQs and I wouldn't trust them to run a peanut stand.
I disagree with this, just because you can always find an "appearance of bias." The best way to argue someone's point in to find fault in the science. It's a cop-out to say "Oh well the tobacco company paid for that study so clearly it's wrong."
According to my personality profiles that I've taken through work over the years I'm both liberal and arrogant, so I suppose I'd be a case in point. I'm trying to work on the arrogance though. I'm not what you'd call very liberal though, so I occassionally get irritated by liberal smug as well.
I really think people are born the way they are more than anything, and I think there is a correlation between certain frames of mind.
Which one he's been married two or three times as I recall.and your opinion is worth...what exactly?
![]()
I wouldn't be surprised if Limbaugh announced soon that he is going to hang it up and retire his microphone. A great advance for human civilization, if you ask me. He'll try to make it seem like it did it voluntarily, but it's because people aren't listening to him as much as they used to.
New Ratings: Conservative Talk Ratings Fall | The Moderate Voice
You all most likely know who he is, but on the chance you don't, he's a legendary conservative/right-wing radio pundit who's been railing against liberals and Democrats for years. He began his popularity back when Bill Clinton became President. He had a little bit of a lull in popularity during the George W. Bush years because he didn't have a Democratic President to attack. With the election of Obama, he's supposed to have come back and be popular again, but it's not exactly working out.
Limbaugh has a rap sheet of controversial comments that goes, like, 170 pages on the website of liberal media watchdog Media Matters. Some of his recent things: mocking Japan in the aftermath of the earthquake there and mockingly speaking in fake Chinese during the state visit of the Chinese President.
Well it was several years ago a fellow I was doing work for shared with me that Rash was raking in about forty million a year for running his mouth. Good to know where our priorities are.
I wouldn't be surprised if Limbaugh announced soon that he is going to hang it up and retire his microphone. A great advance for human civilization, if you ask me. He'll try to make it seem like it did it voluntarily, but it's because people aren't listening to him as much as they used to.
Yeah it's a crazy world fo sho.No worse than Dennis Rodman the basketball player!![]()
![]()
![]()
I doubt that, he's pulling in at least 60M a year.Probably behind on his alimony