Oh Good Lord!!
No, they fired at Hamas. In fact, they warned civilians away whenever possible.
An analogy; If I am shooting at a deer, and I miss, and because I paid no attention to Rule Four I hit some other hunter, I did not fire at the other hunter, I fired at the deer.
If I fired at the other hunter, that is murder.
Leslie accused the IDF of firing at women and children.
That is murder.
This is all glaringly obvious.
(Rule Four: Be sure of your target and what lies beyond it)
You guys REALLY will go to any length to sideswipe a discussion of General Leslie and the Dummy Dauphin, won't you?
You are merely restating your earlier position here, which I think I've already sufficiently proven false. You haven't provided any evidence whatsoever that Leslie used the term "murder." You just keep restating your original claim, despite substantial evidence to the contrary. Saying something is "glaringly obvious" or saying I'm mentally deficient doesn't help your argument. It just brings into relief that you do not have one.
What you are attempting to do, I surmise, is present Leslie as some kind of anti-Semitic radical. In fact, it appears to be a fairly commonly-held belief among the political left that Israel does not do enough to prevent civilian casualties.
What does this mean for Trudeau?
No drama?