No they are only subsidies when it goes to something he doesn't like. For pure waste of money it is an initiative.
Except for Australia, Canada and Saudi Arabia G20 calls for phasing out 'fossil fuel
- Thread starter tay
- Start date
No they are only subsidies when it goes to something he doesn't like. For pure waste of money it is an initiative.
You expect sanity from a system based on the notion that a dirty piece of paper (or a millisecond of code) is worth the same as a steak dinner and a couple of beers, and run by politicians and bankers?
That's so cute!
A bit touchy are we?
Of course there are subsidies.
I was actually using an umbrella term that encompasses something more than just subsidies.
Who do you work for? I want to look up the tax credits and subsidies that your employer gets.
I thought I already did. Just in case it wasn't plain enough You are a shill for the global warming crowd and your sources are admitted liars. Therefore you have zero credibility. Happy now?
there's the thing! You keep blathering on about "my sources"... after repeatedly prodding you to identify the sources you claim have been "caught lyin/cheatin", you finally trot out "NOAA". Of course, you continue to refuse to provide examples of said "lyin/cheatin"; instead you keep up your squawk-fest by posting more of your evasive clap-trap! Talk about (your) zero credibility in refusing to substantiate your pissant claims!
The primary 'authority' that has been promoting AGW (opps, change that to Climate Change now that we have cooled for over a decade) were caught with their hand in the ole cookie jar.
They are washed-up and have no cred whatsoever.
Cling to your fantasy that it was not proven, or a mistake, or some conspiracy theory, but the facts are the facts.
Hal Lewis had recognized it, perhaps you should to
They are washed-up and have no cred whatsoever.
Cling to your fantasy that it was not proven, or a mistake, or some conspiracy theory, but the facts are the facts.
Hal Lewis had recognized it, perhaps you should to
what's heelarious is that the loudest barker steadfast in his claim of there being "NO SUBSIDIES", in the face of my posting that report from the Auditor General's Office, decides to post extensively from that report over multiple posts... but never can quite bring himself to actually say he was wwwwrong!
what twaddle you write! Please provide your evidence that "it's cooling"... a reduced surface temperature warming rate... is not cooling! And, of course, why are you ignoring ocean warming? Cause you can? :lol:. Nice of you to showcase your propensity to propogate memes. There was no "shift" from AGW/GW to CC; both terms always existed, both terms still exist and are used as appropriate, by those that know what they're talking about. Here's a thought for you: what does the "CC" in IPCC stand for... and when did the IPCC form - try 1988! Presto-chango, hey! :lol: You say "caught/hand in cookie jar"... yet another denier who talks in vague accusations but just can't find it in his makeup to actually provide examples.
you calling your denier fantasy facts... doesn't make the so. You assigning "credibility" is a hoot!
and the thousands of other scientists across the world, many with cred significantly beyond your latest fixation with a now dead Hal Lewis?
when do "Fed agencies" do, for example... oil exploration?
gee... doesn't take much to send you over the edge! Did you forget your meds this morning? You lookin' for some more of that drama you so cherish, hey drama queen!
Getting your @ss handed to you again, eh Avro?.. You are butthurt so bad on this... It's so obvious
The Psychologists and Med Dr.s that comprise the 'consensus'?.. Or maybe you mean Mike Mann, you know, the guy that is scarred silly about the Court Order to produce his raw data on the hockey-stick curve?... That 'scientist'?
What a laugh
PS - Maybe you didn't get the memo: NorAm is in the grip of a Polar Vortex (scary sounding, ain't it?) and the Eastern seaboard of the US and Canada are getting pounded by snow.
Though you might want to know
You should direct that request to Avro's handler... Someone will have to read to him as CC isn't formatted like a pop-up book
queenie, wass wrong?
no - I readily accept you are a full-fledged denier that talks shyte and can't back up a single thing you say... evah!
huh! I thought your lil' clubhouse routine had me as "Fagro"... make up your juvenile minds!
that "hockey stick raw data" you parrot about is in the public domain. You do realize there have been a brazillion other reconstructions since those early days, right... you do know that, right? Please tell me your denial extends to include the "hockey stick"... please say it! :lol: Please say you deny the hockey stick... it is a shame that stick can't be broken, hey? Must be titanium, hey!
showcase you can't distinguish weather from climate!
