keep on with your shuck & jive routine. You're nuthin but a C&P wizard, at best! You beak-off making unsubstantiated statements/claims and when pressed to support your BS, you runaway, runaway!
Except for Australia, Canada and Saudi Arabia G20 calls for phasing out 'fossil fuel
- Thread starter tay
- Start date
keep on with your shuck & jive routine. You're nuthin but a C&P wizard, at best! You beak-off making unsubstantiated statements/claims and when pressed to support your BS, you runaway, runaway!
You prefer Fagro?
Either one is fine by me... Let me know your preference
Hmmm... That being the case, it makes you wonder why Mann has defied the Court Order to produce that data.
Interesting, non?
Yep. The one I like best is where buddy plots red noise and comes up with identical results
aw shucks! Your lil clubhouse gets shaken up a bit and you go all goofy. It's a shame you take such exception to someone challenging your denier nonsense, hey!
citation request... make sure you trot out your favourite "I ain't your google bitch" routine to provide you cover.
yet another canard you trot out... but you didn't answer my questions. Again, do you deny the hockey stick; do you claim there are no valid reconstructions?
queenie!!! You likin the drama? :lol:
By meds, do you mean this?
... Oh, and don't forget to wear your hockey helmet Avro.
Will it fit over his tinfoil hat?
Nope You just choose to ignore the facts. Sill projecting your faults.
Tin foil isn't strong enough for Avro/Fagro... I'm thinking some 2" steel plate is what he needs
of course... puuurfect! I wouldn't expect anything different from you! Yet another example of a blustering, blathering denier who can't manage to back-up his statements/claims. Go figure.
right. It's bloody amazing you're just so, so, so, so, so shy in bringing forward any of your so-called facts! I'd think you'd be all "loud and proud" and wanting to share/showcase your "facts". :lol:
hey cappy... do you keep posting that lil' image cause your butt hurts?
World Trade Organization - Definition of a subsidy: AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES
queenie! You likin' the drama you so covet, you Drama Queen, you!
Definition of a Subsidy
1.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, a subsidy shall be deemed to exist if:
1.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, a subsidy shall be deemed to exist if:
(a)(1) there is a financial contribution by a government or any public body within the territory of a Member (referred to in this Agreement as "government"), i.e. where:
(i) a government practice involves a direct transfer of funds (e.g. grants, loans,
and equity infusion), potential direct transfers of funds or liabilities (e.g. loan
guarantees);
(ii) government revenue that is otherwise due is foregone or not collected (e.g.
fiscal incentives such as tax credits);
(iii) a government provides goods or services other than general infrastructure, or
purchases goods;
(iv) a government makes payments to a funding mechanism, or entrusts or directs
a private body to carry out one or more of the type of functions illustrated in
(i) to (iii) above which would normally be vested in the government and the
practice, in no real sense, differs from practices normally followed by
governments;
and equity infusion), potential direct transfers of funds or liabilities (e.g. loan
guarantees);
(ii) government revenue that is otherwise due is foregone or not collected (e.g.
fiscal incentives such as tax credits);
(iii) a government provides goods or services other than general infrastructure, or
purchases goods;
(iv) a government makes payments to a funding mechanism, or entrusts or directs
a private body to carry out one or more of the type of functions illustrated in
(i) to (iii) above which would normally be vested in the government and the
practice, in no real sense, differs from practices normally followed by
governments;
queenie! You likin' the drama you so covet, you Drama Queen, you!
Michael Mann defamation case.
Michael Mann DC Appeals Court brief lays out defamation case and seeks to move toward trial | Climate Science Watch
Michael Mann DC Appeals Court brief lays out defamation case and seeks to move toward trial | Climate Science Watch
the more interesting side of that involves the split between National Review and Mark Steyn... Steyn was initially a co-defendent but decided he, as a non-lawyer, would be better served by representing himself rather than NR lawyers. Given the media-***** Steyn is, his move has resulted in no end of blog material, with an occasional foray that makes it up into the mainstream.
cappy, please... get help for your hurtin' butt!
Wow, just wow.
well, I guess that pretty much confirms and sums up what most have been saying about you.