Death knell for AGW

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Hmmmmm...... That's a real toughie.

How 'bout; the numerous periods of glaciation that covered continents and the consequent warming periods that saw the glaciers recede to a tiny fraction of their max coverage.

That's it, that's my answer... Natural Cycles.

PS - I highlighted an important word for y'all
yeesh! Another guy who attributes warming to "coming out of the LIA"!!!
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit


Hey look!!! Polar ice doesn't follow geomagnetic poles....



sir, that's borderline conspiracy. Can't you ramp it up a bit to bring it full circuit? Everybody keeping the poor denier man/scientist down!
CO2 is a conspiracy.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,267
9,612
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
...Climate does not just "change" on its own. Please state what causal tie(s) you interpret as the attribution behind today's relatively recent warming/climate change...

Huh. I honestly don't know. What causal tie(s) have propelled the
warming/cooling/changing climate on this planet for the last 4-6
billion years? I'm assuming the answer to the above question
might be found with this question.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Huh. I honestly don't know. What causal tie(s) have propelled the
warming/cooling/changing climate on this planet for the last 4-6
billion years? I'm assuming the answer to the above question
might be found with this question.

Apparently, the last 4-6 billion years of flux is a direct result of SUV operation.... Fossil fuels is the ticket

Hey look!!! Polar ice doesn't follow geomagnetic poles....


CO2 is a conspiracy.


Notice how buddy has offered absolutely nothing in terms of supporting his own position?

Many questions, followed-up (of course) with a healthy smattering of 'denier accusations'.

This would be a helluva lot funnier if it wasn't so pathetic
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Huh. I honestly don't know. What causal tie(s) have propelled the
warming/cooling/changing climate on this planet for the last 4-6
billion years? I'm assuming the answer to the above question
might be found with this question.

good on ya! Yes, per the geological record, greenhouse gases (principally CO2) have been shown to play a role in past climate changes.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
Blackleaf???
Exactly


As protons spiral around the magnetic field force lines, they reach the maximum spiral-radius and speed at mid region between the two magnetic poles where the magnetic field intensity is lowest. The protons reach the minimum spiral-radius and speed at each of the magnetic poles, where the magnetic field intensity is highest. Collisions between such spiralling protons and the Thermosphere air molecules at various speeds produce thermal energy and temperatures that are proportionate to the protons speed and radius of its spiral motion. Temperature is found to reach 500° Celsius above the magnetic poles and to gradually escalate to reach 2,000° Celsius above the magnetic equator. This makes the region of magnetic equator to always maintain the highest temperature on the surface of the planet and for the regions of the magnetic poles to maintain the lowest temperature. The trapped, oscillating Sun’s protons between the two magnetic poles, day and night, keeps the Thermosphere thermal radiation uninterrupted, though decaying over nights. Such a phenomenon keeps the Earth surface safe from sharp drop in temperature at nights. If it had not magnetic field to trap the protons, the Earth’s surface would have been bombarded during the day with continuous flow protons and the day temperature would have not been different from the moon which has no magnetic field and a day temperature of 123o Celsius. Equally at nights, if Earth had no magnetic field to trap the protons and keep them travelling between its two magnetic poles, colliding with air molecules and generating thermal radiation to keep a warm surface, the Earth temperature at nights would have not been different from the moon at nights where the temperature reaches -233o Celsius.
The collapse of Earth’s magnetic field in the western and southern hemispheres leads to an increase in the Protons speed and spiral-radius motion around the magnetic force lines. More chances are created for the Protons to collide with Thermosphere air molecules at a higher speed. The impact of stronger collisions results in higher thermal energy reaching Earth’s surface; Global Warming is thus observed. It is imminent, therefore, that a change in the temperature pattern and precipitation map of the planet will follow any change or repositioning of the magnetic poles and the associated magnetic field intensity; causing Climate Ex-change; as some countries experience warmer than before temperatures and others experience cooler than before temperatures as in the case of North America and Siberia respectively in the past couple of winters. The combined effect of the weakening and the tilting of Earth’s magnetic field lowers its intensity above the North Pole ice cap. The lower the intensity and number of the magnetic field force lines, the longer spiral-radius motion and the faster speed will protons pick up. A higher thermal energy is generated upon such protons’ collision with air molecules in the Thermosphere layer.
 

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
Notice how buddy has offered absolutely nothing in terms of supporting his own position?

other than the reeediculous geomagnetics guy, no other buddies have offered didly-squat. Lot's of bluster though; there's sure a lot of bluster coming from other buddies!