Britain to send troops, ship and helicopters to Sierra Leone to combat Ebola

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
2,353 were British and just 574 were foreign. Just 11 were Yanks.


Wrong again and not according to the RAF Museum!


Eagle Squadrons

I blame the poor state of the British education system.

This notice began to appear in American newspapers during July and August. (This particular advertisement appeared in the New York Herald Tribune):
LONDON July 15: The Royal Air Force is in the market for American flyers as well as American airplanes. Experienced airmen, preferably those with at least 250 flying hours, would be welcomed by the RAF.






Absolutely.


As well as their poor education the inability to fight a war that the brits started had the briddish begging Canada and the US for experienced pilots and ground crew.


"The Clayton Knight Committee, working largely in secret, recruited nearly 7,000 American citizens for the RAF or Royal Canadian Air Force, and then arranged for their transportation to Canada. Nearly 250 went on to serve with the Eagle Squadrons. In December, 1941, the United States of America entered the war, and the Clayton Knight Committee ceased its operations"

7,000!
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
2,353 were British and just 574 were foreign. Just 11 were Yanks.
At 83, Julius Meimberg is typical. He can remember almost every detail of a war in which he flew more than 250 missions as a fighter pilot, including dozens over Britain.
'It's all exaggerated,' he said. 'Churchill succeeded in creating this myth that so few did so much for so many. When you look at how we fought against the Americans later, the Battle of Britain was very little in comparison.'
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
At 83, Julius Meimberg is typical. He can remember almost every detail of a war in which he flew more than 250 missions as a fighter pilot, including dozens over Britain.
'It's all exaggerated,' he said. 'Churchill succeeded in creating this myth that so few did so much for so many. When you look at how we fought against the Americans later, the Battle of Britain was very little in comparison.'


The Battle of Britain was a sideshow for the Germans.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The Battle of Britain was a sideshow for the Germans.
But of course, with the state of British dentistry (Which is only overshadowed by British education for being dismal) as a back drop, Britain could only be seen as the freak show.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
8O...........Well, whatever. I'm glad they're sending a medical ship, and personnel, albeit a tad latish.

Dunno how they can "treat" the disease except by quarantine.

Better wash the ship down good before returning home, eh wot.

Bangers and mash when they arrive.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
8O...........Well, whatever. I'm glad they're sending a medical ship, and personnel, albeit a tad latish.

Dunno how they can "treat" the disease except by quarantine.

Better wash the ship down good before returning home, eh wot.

Bangers and mash when they arrive.


The next Ghost Ship.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,956
1,910
113

It's there in the history, the Battle of Britain. Read about it.

At the time that Britain won that battle, she was the only power taking on Nazi Germany, whilst America sat on the sidelines making cushy business deals with the Nazis (Ford is a good example) and the cowardly American Ambassador to Britain, Joseph Kennedy (JFK's dad), became increasingly defeatist, calling the British "finished" and that they had no chance of beating Germany (before they went on to win the Battle of Britain) and retreated to the countryside during the bombings of London by German aircraft, at a time when the British Royal Family, Prime Minister, government ministers, and other ambassadors chose to stay in London. This prompted one wag in Britain's Foreign Office to say, "I thought my daffodils were yellow until I met Joe Kennedy." And don't forget that whilst we were taking on Nazi Germany alone and inflicting her first major defeat of the war (the Battle of Britain) and so staving off a German invasion, every major British city was being bombed and tens of thousands of civilians were being killed.

It's all there in the history books. I can only assume, whilst you disparage Britain's education system (for mysterious reasons I have yet been able to ascertain), that you never learnt about the Battle of Britain and her LONE struggle against Nazi Germany throughout 1940 at school.

This notice began to appear in American newspapers during July and August. (This particular advertisement appeared in the New York Herald Tribune):
LONDON July 15: The Royal Air Force is in the market for American flyers as well as American airplanes. Experienced airmen, preferably those with at least 250 flying hours, would be welcomed by the RAF.

How many Americans fought for the RAF in the Battle of Britain? A grand total of eleven. Just under half of one percent of the 2927 RAF pilots (2353 of whom were British) who took part in that battle were Yanks.

The Poles constituted the greatest number of non-Britons to fight in the RAF in the Battle of Britain - 145 - but even they made up just 5% of the total number of RAF pilots in the Battle of Britain.

Canadian pilots numbered just 112 - a mere 4% of all the RAF pilots who fought in the battle.

You fail....

Eagle Squadrons

utterly.

No. You fail.

The "Eagle Squadrons" were just 250 Yank pilots that Britain never asked for nor needed, in an RAF which numbered over 250,000 personnel (so the Eagle Squadrons were just a thousandth of total RAF personnel) and which lasted for only a year or so, after which the Eagle Squadrons became part of the United States Army Air Force (the US had no air force in WWII) after it joined the war.








8O...........Well, whatever. I'm glad they're sending a medical ship, and personnel, albeit a tad latish.

What's Canada sent there?


Dunno how they can "treat" the disease except by quarantine.

We're doing a lot more to help these people than Canada is. When Ebola is averted from Canada's shores you can thank these British military personnel.
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
When the UK goes out to 'help Nations' why does the whole 5M in the Nation have to learn English rather than the 10 men the UK have there learn the local language? One would seem to be a bit pushy and the other as being a sign of fitting in at the fastest rate, which do you prefer?