China's air pollution leading to more erratic climate for US, say scientists

[MHz]

Reality goes by the wayside when it comes to human CC nutbars.



And Korea but man isn't behind the interglacial Holocene optimum.

You are talking about yourself in the 3rd person, not a huge surprise.

I was referencing this sort of material.

Senior Scientist: Cancer increase expected on West Coast from Fukushima exposures; Radioactive particles can bio-accumulate and form hotspots while crossing Pacific — KCRW: Concern California wildlife to be impacted; Sea life can biomagnify nuc

 

[mentalfloss]

Remove 700-2000m ocean temps and it's a negative. Why remove? Only the first couple hundred meters can impact climate.

Yea, remove the warming and you don't have the warming.

 

[Twila]

so, is this going to lead to something?

 

[EagleSmack]

so, is this going to lead to something?

Outside of more whining from alarmist... not likely.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Outside of more whining from alarmist... not likely.

Well, that and bitchiness from deniers.

 

[MHz]

If the warming is coming from deep water in the oceans then we only have to cool down the magma and the core to get a stable surface temperature........ It is going to take more than a few pieces of chalk on a big blackboard to figure that one out.

Speaking of blackboards I wish they would not put Stephen Hawkins in fron of one that is full of advanced equations as nobody is going to think he wrote it.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Stephen. . . Hawkins??????

 

[EagleSmack]

Well, that and bitchiness from deniers.

Please do not mistake our mocking for bitchiness.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Please do not mistake our mocking for bitchiness.

 

[petros]

Yea, remove the warming and you don't have the warming.

Of course it should.

Are you up for some learning? It was only yesterday you found out we are in an ice age. Would like like to learn more about geology, geophysics and physics?

It's not warming anything out of the ordinary during an interglacial.

Have you read any of the IPCC material on our current interglacial period?

There are some really good things to discuss if you're up to it. It will probably give you a much wider scope on our planet and climate over time beyond the last 40 years.

Read up on the IPCC's way of explaining the rise and fall in temps, the retraction and regrowth of glaciers then read up the interaction of the magnetoshere and the magnetic fields generated by both ocean and atmospheric currents, changes to the dipole system, other sources of ocean acidity and then perhaps you'll see the big picture.


It would be refreshing to have a proper debate that is based on facts, geophysical systems and geological time the way long term climate needs to be discussed.

 

[mentalfloss]

Could you blow any harder?

Make your case already.

 

[petros]

Your done learning already? Pretty cool stuff huh Sherman? What do you think of IPCC's reasonings? Are they correct in stating the previous warming in our interglacial period should be looked at regionally and not a whole like they do today. Why?

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Could you blow any harder?

Make your case already.

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/i...-questions-oklahoma-about-global-warming.html

 

[taxslave]

The IPCC will deny an ice age is coming until they freeze inthir boots. and then it will still be the fault of AGW

 

[petros]

We are already in an ice age tax slave.

 

[taxslave]

We are already in an ice age tax slave.

I know that. But the deniers are still pushing their discredited GW scam hoping to make a billion or two for nothing.

 

[Dixie Cup]

But hey, there's too much money involved for the greenies to give up. I mean, look at Gore. He became a multi-millionaire almost over night because of all this crap. So too have others who stand to benefit and you and I are paying for it BIG TIME!!


My concern isn't climate change or global warming or whatever the heck you want to call it. My concern is pollution - of the air, water and ground. These are far more important to humanity than any climate/global changes. Fuki - whatever concerns me much more than any hurricane or tornado. If it poisons the ocean, then it kills everything in it and I LUV sea food!!


JMO

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

But hey, there's too much money involved for the greenies to give up. I mean, look at Gore. He became a multi-millionaire almost over night because of all this crap.

Gore was born a multi-millionaire. Whatever his reason is, money is probably not a big factor.

 

[Dixie Cup]

Gore was born a multi-millionaire. Whatever his reason is, money is probably not a big factor.

au contraire - it is the ONLY factor

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

au contraire - it is the ONLY factor

No, money is a surrogate for status. Politicians, by nature, are people driven to be at the top of the heap. Generally, that means lotsa bucks. But the equivalency is not perfect. Given adequate but not superlative money, people like Gore and Obama will go for power instead of more money. Meanwhile, people like Bill Gates will seek only as much power as they need to accomplish what they want to accomplish.