Greenpeace calls for Elections Canada probe of Ethical Oil
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
There is absolutely NOTHING to investigate Ethical Oil for.....full stop. If you watched the vid, you would hear MSM reporters trying to get the GP spokesman to issue a single specific allegation......something he completely fails to do.
As for GP, who cares?? The point is NOT what GP is doing that is illegal, (much of which, btw, they are PROUD of), the point is GP trying to stifle those that disagree with innuendo and baseless smears.
Watch the vid.
You're right.
It wouldn't be good for ratings if they removed a villain.
LOL!!
Obviously, you have nothing of worth to say........
Yeah right, God Forbid there be a newscaster that actually does not buy into the idiot progressive mantra,
Ezra Levant, as I said before, is sometimes a loud-mouthed twit.
He is also a tireless support of out rights, was instrumental in getting section 13 dumped by the gov't and exposing the anti liberty agenda of Canada's HRCs, and was the only Canadian willing to publish the Mohammed cartoons instead of suppressing the news to appease Muslim fanatics.
For that, I will forgive him his irritating ways.
So, what have YOU done for us lately......
BTW, as for Fox News down south, it is the most popular news source in the USA, was judged as being the most even-handed news source over the 2012 election cycle, and has been simply demonized by idiots because they want only ONE view (their own) on the air.
Funny, I do not watch FOX. I did not listen to Fox, and believed to some extent the labeling done by idiots on Fox News in general, and Bill O'Reilly in particular. Then I happened to hear his show come on in our patrol truck (Sirius radio 114
) so I thought I would listen to see what the old fascist had to say:The first segment was on same-sex marriage. O'Reilly castigated the OPPOSITION to gay marriage, pointing out all they had to go on was Bible thumping...
WHAT????
The second segment was on pollution of the nation's rivers, in which O'Reilly bemoaned the fact that only fines could be leveled on the polluters, instead of the CEOs of polluting companies getting jail terms....
WHAT????
This is the fascist, the hard right wing lunatic, the throw-back, the threat to all that is good in the USA????
So I started listening....and he is abrasive, sometimes he has ridiculous attitudes (his anti-marijuana rants for one) but he is also bright and usually fair.
I was ashamed of being fooled by the brainless mantra-chanting of progressives about "faux" news.
Guys, Ethical Oil has been dodging questions about funding and political ties since it started and it's been well documented by all media.
Oh, except that hero of the freedom and accountability, lol
Oh, except that hero of the freedom and accountability, lol
This would explain Cobalt Kids spam about Harper gutting Elections Canada. It's all becoming very clear now.
Oh it has been well documented by ALL media, has it??
Care to offer a single instance of that "documentation"???
Canada's Real Problem with Intrusive Foreign Interests - TheTyee.ca - Mobile
The Transparent Hypocrisy of Ethical Oil – who is really laundering money | eaves.ca
EthicalOil.org and the Harper Government -The Common Sense CanadianThe Common Sense Canadian
Tory-linked "Ethical Oil" website slams Canadian enviros over "foreign funding" | Vancouver Observer
Kathryn Marshall is the shilling spokeshole that won't reveal their sources of funding.
Gee, I wonder why?
terrorists rarely if ever, 'threaten' anyone. they're much more proactive, not allergic to work. that sorta idea.
If you consider left wing rags as media I suppose this has been well documented. I'm more interested in knowing which US corporate interests are financing anti oilsands protests in Canada.
One would think that after a while Canadian protesters would figure out why their a$$holes hurt.
Please.
I guess Macleans is a left wing rag as well?
Canada's crude awakening - Macleans.ca
And this belays the point that Ethical Oil is hiding where they get their funding, but I guess transparency only counts when its on the greenbeans amirite?
What a sad little argument you make on this.
Got you knickers all in a twist on 'where' the cash is coming from rather than the actual message they represent.
Got you knickers all in a twist on 'where' the cash is coming from rather than the actual message they represent.