Death knell for AGW

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Climate change: How do we know?


This graph, based on the comparison of atmospheric samples contained in ice cores and more recent direct measurements, provides evidence that atmospheric CO2 has increased since the Industrial Revolution. (Source: NOAA)


DB

(Right, what a bunch of slithering lying dung balls, where in fork did they get 650,000 years of ice core data)
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
That was kind of the point. Before suggesting a series on climate change, you should get a grasp of some more basic science first. After you manage that, I'd suggest the PHSC 13400 lectures from University of Chicago:
Lecture 1 - Scope of the Class - YouTube

You can audit the entire course, for free! And of course learn...

So did you like the pop ups?

Viewing that would be 11mins and 19 seconds of my time. Pfft.

Quick!!!

make some bank transfers!

Billions stat! That will stop the climate from changing!
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
Your spectrometer has the advantage here. It may surprise you that few of us poorer scientists have them. Why do you have this hate on for a harmless friendly gas?

I just f*ckin' hate 'em, OK? I want to destroy them. :lol:

Here you go--a spectrometer made from a CD and a cereal box.

Make Your Own Spectrometer



An economics school? What the hell do they know?

MIT also has many physics courses. I've taken a couple. And they're free!

MIT OpenCourseWare | Free Online Course Materials

Viewing that would be 11mins and 19 seconds of my time. Pfft.


More than that. Probably a few courses to understand the principles of meteorology, atmospheric physics, radiation physics, statistical processes, diff-EQs, chaos theory, yadda yadda yadda.

I think you're best off just being completely ignorant adn spouting off nonsense. It's workgin for ya.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I just f*ckin' hate 'em, OK? I want to destroy them. :lol:

Here you go--a spectrometer made from a CD and a cereal box.

Make Your Own Spectrometer





MIT also has many physics courses. I've taken a couple. And they're free!

MIT OpenCourseWare | Free Online Course Materials




More than that. Probably a few courses to understand the principles of meteorology, atmospheric physics, radiation physics, statistical processes, diff-EQs, chaos theory, yadda yadda yadda.

I think you're best off just being completely ignorant adn spouting off nonsense. It's workgin for ya.

Thanks for the plans, looks like fun.

I signed up for physics 11.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
46
48
66
Earth's continued habitability due to geologic cycles that act as climate control



Scientists have shown how geologic process regulates the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Researchers have documented evidence suggesting that part of the reason that Earth has become neither sweltering like Venus nor frigid like Mars lies with a built-in atmospheric carbon dioxide regulator -- the geologic cycles that churn up the planet's rocky surface.


Goldilocks principle: Earth's continued habitability due to geologic cycles that act as climate control -- ScienceDaily
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
46
48
66
Michael Den Tandt ‏@mdentandt

Pls consider this, then say with straight face that the science is entirely settled and to say otherwise is heresy http://econ.st/MOjh4x

BETWEEN 1998 and 2013, the Earth’s surface temperature rose at a rate of 0.04°C a decade, far slower than the 0.18°C increase in the 1990s. Meanwhile, emissions of carbon dioxide (which would be expected to push temperatures up) rose uninterruptedly. This pause in warming has raised doubts in the public mind about climate change. A few sceptics say flatly that global warming has stopped. Others argue that scientists’ understanding of the climate is so flawed that their judgments about it cannot be accepted with any confidence. A convincing explanation of the pause therefore matters both to a proper understanding of the climate and to the credibility of climate science—and papers published over the past few weeks do their best to provide one. Indeed, they do almost too good a job. If all were correct, the pause would now be explained twice over.

more

Global warming: Who pressed the pause button? | The Economist