Hell? For?
Hell? For?
She's pretty hot (and correct) in the vid on Hillary and her sordid history. Where does she go when her eyes are darting all over the place or is that just so she doesn't look straight at the camera lens? If that is the case shooting more from a profile angle will save her from doing that at some party and people start backing up as the benign topic is going on.Ewww.
Nope, ewwww pretty much covers it.She's pretty hot (and correct) in the vid on Hillary and her sordid history. Where does she go when her eyes are darting all over the place or is that just so she doesn't look straight at the camera lens? If that is the case shooting more from a profile angle will save her from doing that at some party and people start backing up as the benign topic is going on.
Sorry, was there more you wanted to add to that?
What's that creaking noise, the taps closing for the Ukraine and a lot of Europe.No pay, no right of way. Sorry Bolsheviks, you're going to have to find another route.
Oddly enough that one word painted a picture that was even too vivid to finish, ..... not so odd considering the 'source'Nope, ewwww pretty much covers it.
Well , well the Putin lover is still at it.What's that creaking noise, the taps closing for the Ukraine and a lot of Europe.
Guess how far down the list the Ukraine is on getting the gas when the rest of Europe is on the hunt also, at above premium prices, deposits into BRIC accounts which is pretty much anything but American. (if that is even still there, the client list of nations is still there) Far end of the pipeline is also a factor that is not unimportant. Come spring unemployment would be at 0% and the new industry would be burying the dead that died during the record cold spring of 2014. That is a lot bigger than a, 'Whoops.' moment. War crime court would be a holiday compared to letting the hoards at the gates have them for a night of games.
How long before the names in the attempted coup is as detailed as this 9/11 film is? Leaky e-mails are so embarrassing.
"Ten Years Later": The Money Trail of the 9/11 Terror Attacks. - YouTube
Oddly enough that one word painted a picture that was even too vivid to finish, ..... not so odd considering the 'source'
Done, waiting for a reply, they came here instead, feel free to chirp in little birdie.Or better go to Ukraine and tell them what you think I am sure you would get all the attention you want so badly.
Your chirping enough and as par per usual making no sense but hey your still here in wonderful North America where you can do that .Done, waiting for a reply, they came here instead, feel free to chirp in little birdie.
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/international-politics/122554-ukraine.html
How can you criticize my view if it is something you don't understand? What would you do if my view became the more popular one?Your chirping enough and as par per usual making no sense but hey your still here in wonderful North America where you can do that .
FYI This is not a popularity contest , this is about freedom of a people who were under a criminal government which you avoid to mention and also they are tired of Russian intervention over many many years which you also fail to prove or mention except through lies and innuendo.What are the odds of that making it to the ICC for some war crimes charges? The old PM was caught trying to smuggle out a sniper rifle and that would have been the right sized bullet to frame the Govt.
I'm not suggesting that somebody should send that group the JFK tape but somebody should send that group the JFK tape.
How can you criticize my view if it is something you don't understand? What would you do if my view became the more popular one?
If I say all 4 of your banks are under water would you (rightly) Sherlock the sentence to mean your thinking was (greatly) flawed??
Now that is misinformation and misleading but nice try . Next time use facts I hear it is more reliable than telling tales.If there is so little freedom, how do you happen to get e-mails from within closed borders. I suggest there is much exaggeration and disinformation from BOTH perspectives.
I see... Agenda. Take your war HOMENow that is misinformation and misleading but nice try . Next time use facts I hear it is more reliable than telling tales.
Russia is only in Crimea and there are no demonstrations demanding any changes. They are Ukrainian so they would protest if they didn't like the current situation, right?FYI This is not a popularity contest , this is about freedom of a people who were under a criminal government which you avoid to mention and also they are tired of Russian intervention over many many years which you also fail to prove or mention except through lies and innuendo.
We are chatting (using a loose definition of the term) I'm learning a lot about you and if your view is typical I can see why Russian speaking people would want to separate based on that issue alone. Being sold out to the Central Banks is a much larger crime and some bankers and politicians should be headed for court.Read , learn , study , these are the basics of understanding then after you grasp those go there and see it first hand what is actually happening .
Johnny on the spot though. I admit the quality is not the best but a few photoshop macros would add stabilization of the picture so all the jerking around can be minimized. In theory a jerky 320 x 200 could end up being a full 640 x 480 and not lose any detail. Picture enhancement programs such as Perfect Picture use fractual algorithms to allow digital zooms that are quite accurate for artistic purposes. The vid of the getting shot in the back is one that could use a few of those enhancements and the cameras of today can be very small and the quality is a lot higher than 640, more like 1080 and that would be clear enough for any court. Video statements could also mean killing a witness after one is made only allows that in so there is no real gain. Bribing them with a lot of money is still legal. lol.Fact there have never been US troops in Ukraine and those cheap youtube video's you post are just that ...cheap.
In this day and age it is best to archive all the media releases you can but it will still be the citizens on patrol that will have the best footage. Judging by what is promoted by some media only means you are getting the view that somebody is pushing as being factual. The media is on the record as saying they are under no obligation to publish the truth. (they should allow access to all the footage they collect rather than what they decide to publish as the 'important headlines'. Now if the ICC was hearing the issue what is 'published' there is inspected a little more closely, actually a lot more closely. Youtube doesn't make your sign that what you are promoting is the truth, the ICC would demand that. Nobody is going to argue against video that is accurate, like where the shots came from and who released the vid. There should also be a sound difference such as when the bullet hits the tree and the sound is recorded and the two variables should tell you where the shots came from. Get enough oddball video and you might be able to determine who the shooters were. For instance there is a youtube vid of snipers that are said to be Government troops and looking at it closely you can tell it is not 'regular army' and if what was accidentally filmed out the window could be used to show a location that is a 'suspected location' and the sound of the shots could be matched to the timing of the shots the snipers were letting go.Fact Russian troops are in Ukraine with many videos and reports from news and people actually there watching this.
Actuall I did mention it and it should be in this thread. Putin is claiming that the troops are not taking orders from the Kremlin. Look at them as being 'hired gunmen who look and act like Russian Special Forces. As people in the Crimean Military deserted their posts they swore an oath to the new Crimean Government to protect the land and it would be people like the Captain that 'switched' could be the one talking to the ones who would rather serve the old government. A vote on independence would mean they would either have to support that move or quit the military and be escorted off Crimean soil.Fact Putin lies again and again about there being no Russian troops in Ukraine which you also fail to mention and how quaint to miss such a point .
It is true that it is not all that good, trade with others is the way he is trying to change that. His military goals are realized and they are defensive in nature rather than conquest orientated. The land already had all the riches they need, getting it to market is how you get a good living standard without being a nation that finds it's riches in lands other than their own.Fact The Russian economy is very bad , fact Putin lies about how well they are doing and not surprisingly lies about those facts to make himself look as a hero of Russia.
You can post what you said in the e-mail and delete all the 'sensitive' material that isn't relevant to what a gossip you are.Fact ..you do not read very well as I will not post emails from friends who said they cannot believe what ignorant people like you are writing here in North America so again they are emails not comments but had you read what I wrote you would have seen that but NO you chose to keep writing lies and innuendos about that as it would prove you are right about Russia which you are not.
I am a man, that is why I answered you questions some time ago. It was the post that has no, no, on two lines at the very top of my post. Perhaps that reading comprehension comment is more about yourself than it is about a quality of mine.Be a man and admit your wrong or stop writing and insulting those who are fighting for the freedom of their country who are actually there or have been there which by the way you have NEVER answered.
Nope is was about you.Russia is only in Crimea and there are no demonstrations demanding any changes. They are Ukrainian so they would protest if they didn't like the current situation, right?
So you are telling me that Russia and Crimea were like Israel and Gaza from 1967-1987? How much of the USSR troubles were from the cold war and the amount of money that was spent on a useless arms race. Russia lost that when they had to pull out of Afghanistan and the financial collapse that followed not long after. The natural resources were still there and, like Canada, it provides a tidy income from exports. Even when not flowing it rises in value as the price is always going to rise with the passage of time.
We are chatting (using a loose definition of the term) I'm learning a lot about you and if your view is typical I can see why Russian speaking people would want to separate based on that issue alone. Being sold out to the Central Banks is a much larger crime and some bankers and politicians should be headed for court.
Johnny on the spot though. I admit the quality is not the best but a few photoshop macros would add stabilization of the picture so all the jerking around can be minimized. In theory a jerky 320 x 200 could end up being a full 640 x 480 and not lose any detail. Picture enhancement programs such as Perfect Picture use fractual algorithms to allow digital zooms that are quite accurate for artistic purposes. The vid of the getting shot in the back is one that could use a few of those enhancements and the cameras of today can be very small and the quality is a lot higher than 640, more like 1080 and that would be clear enough for any court. Video statements could also mean killing a witness after one is made only allows that in so there is no real gain. Bribing them with a lot of money is still legal. lol.
In this day and age it is best to archive all the media releases you can but it will still be the citizens on patrol that will have the best footage. Judging by what is promoted by some media only means you are getting the view that somebody is pushing as being factual. The media is on the record as saying they are under no obligation to publish the truth. (they should allow access to all the footage they collect rather than what they decide to publish as the 'important headlines'. Now if the ICC was hearing the issue what is 'published' there is inspected a little more closely, actually a lot more closely. Youtube doesn't make your sign that what you are promoting is the truth, the ICC would demand that. Nobody is going to argue against video that is accurate, like where the shots came from and who released the vid. There should also be a sound difference such as when the bullet hits the tree and the sound is recorded and the two variables should tell you where the shots came from. Get enough oddball video and you might be able to determine who the shooters were. For instance there is a youtube vid of snipers that are said to be Government troops and looking at it closely you can tell it is not 'regular army' and if what was accidentally filmed out the window could be used to show a location that is a 'suspected location' and the sound of the shots could be matched to the timing of the shots the snipers were letting go.
Would that sort of stuff replace the need to be there and film it all myself?
Actuall I did mention it and it should be in this thread. Putin is claiming that the troops are not taking orders from the Kremlin. Look at them as being 'hired gunmen who look and act like Russian Special Forces. As people in the Crimean Military deserted their posts they swore an oath to the new Crimean Government to protect the land and it would be people like the Captain that 'switched' could be the one talking to the ones who would rather serve the old government. A vote on independence would mean they would either have to support that move or quit the military and be escorted off Crimean soil.
At this rate Putin will get lots of 'orders' to have Russians sent in some 'private security' when trouble between the bosses and the workers breaks out. Once the 'equipment' is in place the people living in the area sign up and are given a handbook (constitution) that follows UN Human Rights suggestions and that's about all that has happened so far in this living example. How is the north doing?
I'm surprised you haven't claimed Putin is Satan himself rather than just knowing what doesn't work in the long-run.
It is true that it is not all that good, trade with others is the way he is trying to change that. His military goals are realized and they are defensive in nature rather than conquest orientated. The land already had all the riches they need, getting it to market is how you get a good living standard without being a nation that finds it's riches in lands other than their own.
Are you suggesting he has broadcasts for the locals and another for foreigners?
It was just revealed that in the last 3 months 675,000 Russian speaking Ukrainians have moved to Russia because they feared for their safety?
How many times has the West broadcast that fact?
How would you like to comment on that aspect of actual events?
You can post what you said in the e-mail and delete all the 'sensitive' material that isn't relevant to what a gossip you are.
I am a man, that is why I answered you questions some time ago. It was the post that has no, no, on two lines at the very top of my post. Perhaps that reading comprehension comment is more about yourself than it is about a quality of mine.
#428Re: Russia Prepared To Fight War Over Ukraine, Senior Government Official Admits
1 day ago Quote: Originally Posted by tworivers
MHzNo.
We just came back from Kyiv can you say the same about being in either Russia or Ukraine.
Have you ever left Canada or have you ever actually talked to people that live there in Russia or Ukraine ?
Again please go to Russia then write us about how happy you are and how bad we have it here in Canada.
No.