To me dogma is taking a metaphor as literal truth...What I realized was that once you remove the dogma of those beliefs, they were all talking basically about the same things. It is the dogma that separates them and creates misunderstanding and animosity. What I have been trying, all this tome, is to get you to see that we actually have similar beliefs but you are letting dogma get in the way of seeing that.
I rely heavily on etymology when it comes to understanding words based upon their origins, Cliffy.
dogma (n.)
c.1600 (in plural dogmata), from Latin dogma "philosophical tenet," from Greek dogma (genitive dogmatos) "opinion, tenet," literally "that which one thinks is true," from dokein "to seem good, think" (see
decent). Treated in 17c.-18c. as a Greek word in English.
Online Etymology Dictionary
decent (adj.)
1530s, "proper to one's station or rank," also "tasteful," from Middle French décent, or directly from Latin decentem (nominative decens) "becoming, seemly, fitting, proper," present participle of decere "to be fitting or suitable," from PIE *deke-, from root *dek- "to take, accept, to receive, greet, be suitable" (cf. Greek dokein "to appear, seem, think," dekhesthai "to accept;" Sanskrit daśasyati "shows honor, is gracious," dacati "makes offerings, bestows;" Latin docere "to teach," decus "grace, ornament"). Meaning "kind, pleasant" is from 1902. Are you decent? (1949) was originally backstage theater jargon for "are you dressed."
Online Etymology Dictionary
Thanks, Cliffy. I didn't realize until just now how dogma and grace are related.
I don't know why you haven't figured this out yet, but no, I'm not going to do that. That's not what this thread is about, it was not my intention to start a discussion to dissect any or all of them, and I'm not particularly interested in doing so, I think their cruelty and illogic speak for themselves. If you have a point to make about one of them, or all of them, or a subset of them, go ahead and make it, start your own thread about it if you wish, but stop trying to make me follow your agenda.
"First, the law as laid out in the Old Testament is pretty nasty. It includes prescriptions that are criminal offenses in any civilized society, like stoning a stubborn and rebellious son to death, stoning adulterers to death, killing people who work on the Sabbath, wear clothes made of two different kinds of fibres, plant two different crops in the same field and, as Sam Harris pointed out, mandate savage penalties for imaginary crimes. There are 613 such rules according to the rabbinical tradition, mostly laid out in Leviticus and Deuteronomy, and they describe an extraordinarily brutal totalitarian society." (Your words, Dex.)
"I'll contend with your second point as time is limited, but my brain even more so. I'll let Motar handle your first point." (cj's words.)
Just following the discussion as it unfolds, Dex.