Ockers Live Down to Their Awful Reputation-Shark Slaughter

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
6,034
579
113
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
I've said it before I'll say it again-in a country established for and by criminals what more can one expect?These are people Happy to sell the dirt under their feet expecting that tomorrow there'll be more & more dirt-they have NFC.

Anger as first shark killed in WA’s controversial cull program
Ecologists slam shark cull as 'shameful' and 'archaic' after fisherman seen shooting large shark caught in drumlines


The animal shot and towed out to sea in Western Australian waters is believed to have been a tiger shark.

Opponents of the Western Australian government's shark-killing program have responded angrily to the first slaughter in the state's waters.

The WA government has contracted a fisherman to set and monitor baited drumlines one kilometre off beaches in the south-west region.

The fisherman was reportedly seen off Old Dunsborough on Sunday morning shooting a large shark that had been caught in the lines and towing it further out to sea.

The lines were set up on Saturday afternoon.

American wildlife ecologist David Steen decried the policy, which was brought in after a seventh fatal shark attack in WA waters in three years, as a "shameful, archaic attempt to pre-emptively reduce conflict with people".

"So sad" and "shame", others wrote on social media.

Sea Shepherd's Jeff Hansen said the shark was "believed to be a beautiful tiger shark" more than three metres long.

"Can we expect [WA premier] Colin Barnett to be sporting one of those Mick Dundee hats but with shark's instead of croc teeth soon?" the WA opposition's Paul Papalia tweeted.

The controversial program went ahead after federal environment minister Greg Hunt granted Western Australia an exemption under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, allowing the protected great white shark to be killed.

In a notice to mariners warning of navigational hazards, the WA government said drumlines would soon be deployed in metropolitan waters, extending from Quinns Rock Beach to Warnbro beach.

It has been forced to rope in its own department of fisheries officers to do the work after commercial operators pulled out following threats from activists.

The lines, which are attached to floating buoys, bear the warning: "No vessel is to approach, moor to or interfere with the above equipment at any time – modified penalties will apply."

Activists have pledged to interfere with the program.

A rally against the cull is scheduled for Cottesloe beach – the electorate and home suburb of Barnett – on 1 February.

Thousands of people attended the previous protest.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
Swim in the ocean and the shark'll get ya
Swim in the lakes or rivers and the crocs'll get ya
Then there's the nice spiders and snakes
Cane toads..........."bletch" !!
No wonder it was used as a penal colony.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,933
1,910
113
The Canadians bludgeon seals to death, so how are you any different?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,933
1,910
113
Tough to explain to someone who-

1-has never seen a Seal-or any marine mammal of any type.

2-has never caught a fish let alone a Shark-or ventured out on any type of ocean.

Honestly why would I bother with one such as you?


And yet you're the one who set up a whole thread criticising Australians for catching sharks.

And don't worry. I know what seals look like. Half of the world's entire population of grey seals live around the British coast.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
And yet you're the one who set up a whole thread criticising Australians for catching sharks.

And don't worry. I know what seals look like. Half of the world's entire population of grey seals live around the British coast.
You don't seem to understand the difference between catching and a cull.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
The Canadians bludgeon seals to death, so how are you any different?

For starters, Canadian sealers don't require an exception to the Species at Risk Act. Second, if you want to debate humane killing methods, I'd put brain ablation up against a slow prolonged death/morbidity in a net any day. Third, Canadian sealers are selective, while a drift nets are indiscriminate, and kill not only endangered sharks but marine mammals and a host of other species. Less than 5% of the animals caught in those nets are large sharks involved in the attacks in the first place. And lastly, shark nets aren't effective at meeting their intended purpose, beaches with shark nets still have fatal shark attacks.

All of which makes it a bad idea, and a poor analogy as well to compare Canadian sealers to these shark net programs.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,933
1,910
113
For starters, Canadian sealers don't require an exception to the Species at Risk Act.


It still doesn't take away from the fact that, in the 21st century, Canada is responsible for one of the most barbaric acts of cruelty against animals on the planet.


All of which makes it a bad idea, and a poor analogy as well to compare Canadian sealers to these shark net programs.
Some people would say, not unreasonably, that BOTH the bludgeoning to death of seals and the killing of these sharks are barbaric in this day and age.


If the Canadians are so concerned about animal cruelty they need to get their own house in order before pointing fingers elsewhere.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,253
11,045
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
It still doesn't take away from the fact that, in the 21st century, Canada is responsible for one of the most barbaric acts of cruelty against animals on the planet.


Some people would say, not unreasonably, that BOTH the bludgeoning to death of seals and the killing of these sharks are barbaric in this day and age.


If the Canadians are so concerned about animal cruelty they need to get their own house in order before pointing fingers elsewhere.

Canadians also harvest cattle & horses (meat for sale to the
Asian & European markets) & chickens and so on and so
forth. The meat is eaten or sold to be eaten, and the hides
are used for leather, and so on and so forth.

What are the sharks being harvested & used for? What
about the other 95% of the critters in the nets? Kind'a
seems wasteful.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
It still doesn't take away from the fact that, in the 21st century, Canada is responsible for one of the most barbaric acts of cruelty against animals on the planet.


Some people would say, not unreasonably, that BOTH the bludgeoning to death of seals and the killing of these sharks are barbaric in this day and age.


If the Canadians are so concerned about animal cruelty they need to get their own house in order before pointing fingers elsewhere.

Do you eat wild caught fish? Most English probably do. Before you go spouting off about what is barbaric, consider how they fish ends up on your plate.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,253
11,045
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Canadians also harvest cattle & horses (meat for sale to the
Asian & European markets) & chickens and so on and so
forth. The meat is eaten or sold to be eaten, and the hides
are used for leather, and so on and so forth.

What are the sharks being harvested & used for? What
about the other 95% of the critters in the nets? Kind'a
seems wasteful.

So do the Australians.

So lets take this back to the Shark - Seal thing....





....and what's happening to the sharks according to the Opening Post?
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
It still doesn't take away from the fact that, in the 21st century, Canada is responsible for one of the most barbaric acts of cruelty against animals on the planet.

Only the most blatant of hypocrites would criticize the hunt of an animal while stating the "Nazi's didn't do enough" in their genocide of specific groups of human beings.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,358
9,531
113
Washington DC
Beefeaters? Seriously?

I always thought it was Beefeathers. Never understood that. Bees don't have feathers.

Learn something new every day.
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
So lets take this back to the Shark - Seal thing....





....and what's happening to the sharks according to the Opening Post?

Most of the meat is left to rot. It;s the fur we're after, not the meat. There's no market for teh meat. There's some money in the blubber, but not enough to make it worthwhile to harvest. The *****es are collected though--Chineses aphrodesiac.