Better for who?
The white people drinking the tea and playing polo. Not so much for thenatives that serve the tea and muck out the stalls.
Better for who?
Hello darkbeaver.Nice to meet you. I am agreed with you. Holy Roman Empire was broken by titillating nationism because kings or queens want owe the nation alone. The nationism also caused WW1 WW2. How regrettable it is.Hello chineseroman, nice to meet you, interesting discussion. The people who own and operate the planet are cosmopolitans and because they have no allegiance to any culture except their own they win every engagement. The culture of the west long ago lost it's organic roots and for the last century has been nurtured in a completely synthetic medium. So today to argue the merits of one synthetic system over the others is simply dancing to the masters tune. They love to watch us dance. Slavery is more prevalent today than at any time in history.![]()
How regretful the western culture has been nurtured by synthetic medium. How greatful Aristotele was. He is the root of the whole western civilization. He is fortuitous in the planet. I mean the civilization of western is not common in the world. It is a gift by God.Hello chineseroman, nice to meet you, interesting discussion. The people who own and operate the planet are cosmopolitans and because they have no allegiance to any culture except their own they win every engagement. The culture of the west long ago lost it's organic roots and for the last century has been nurtured in a completely synthetic medium. So today to argue the merits of one synthetic system over the others is simply dancing to the masters tune. They love to watch us dance. Slavery is more prevalent today than at any time in history.![]()
Better for who?
The white people drinking the tea and playing polo. Not so much for thenatives that serve the tea and muck out the stalls.
The USSR didn't constitute half of the world's land area. It constituted a sixth of the world's land area and was around the same size as the whole of North America, which consists of Greenland, Canada, USA, Mexico, Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, the Caribbean nations and some European countries' overseas territories, including the British Overseas Territories of Bermuda, Anguilla, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Montserrat and Turks and Caicos Islands. Even today, Russia is twice the size of Canada.
But even the Soviet Union was puny in size, and in population, compared to the British Empire. Whereas the USSR constituted a sixth of the world's landmass and had a peak population of 293 million, the British Empire, at its height in the 1920s, constituted a QUARTER of the world's landmass. At a peak size of 13,012,000 sq mi, the British Empire was 1.5 times bigger than the USSR and had a peak population of 460 million, which was a fifth of the world's population at the time.
Compared to the British Empire, the USSR was small fry.
Yeah, but with your taxes having to support imprisoned Indian salt-marchers on that landmass made it more of an economic burden, no?
Not really. We made plenty of money from the salt tax.
You won't here me brag about how we managed to rip off indigenous land.
On the backs of the Indians. You must be proud.
I hope I don't. You should be deeply ashamed.
Who else would it be on the backs of? It was in India. Indians deserve to be taxed just like the yanks did and just like everyone else does.
It's amazing some of the silly things that people, who obviously haven't done their research, believe. I still find it amazing, and I always will.
Indeed you do amaze us with your silliness.
Indeed you do amaze us with your silliness.
Silliness? I'm not going round making the astonishing claim that the British invented concentration camps.
Silliness? I'm not going round making the astonishing claim that the British invented concentration camps.
Well they did have them.
Well they did have them.
So did other countries, and before us. To say the British "invented concentration camps" is a myth perpetrated only by idiots who haven't done proper research beforehand.
So did other countries, and before us. To say the British "invented concentration camps" is a myth perpetrated only by idiots who haven't done proper research beforehand.
So you admit that the Brits murdered 10s of thousands in these camps.
So you admit that the Brits murdered 10s of thousands in these camps.
And what camps would they be?
Blackleaf;1847343[/QUOTE said:QUOTE=Goober;1847254]
And what camps would they be?
Boer War. Problem with knowing your own history I see, well we all see that. Well we can help you out.
And learn to stop screwing up the quotes.
Is that the war in which the British supposedly invented concentration camps?
Did I say that? Did I ask that?
Care to answer what I asked?