Well, I'd give Mulcair about 2% and Harper about 4% and Trudeau about 5% and that adds up to 11%. -
Quit picking on Obama……
- Thread starter DaSleeper
- Start date
Well, I'd give Mulcair about 2% and Harper about 4% and Trudeau about 5% and that adds up to 11%. -
The National Post is a Blog????? c'mon, TORRYGLORY, YOU CAN DO BETTER THAN THAT:lol:
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_approval_rating B Obama has the most consistent ratings pattern since Ronald Reagan. He avoids the 'high low swing .'
Last edited:
The only National Post article you linked was from December 2012.
The shiny pony story is from a July blog in the Ottawa Business Journal.
Your barry approval via Gallup was from June, while the 'world' stuff was back in March.
Protip #1: If one were sloppy or in a rush to just do a lazy google search on a topic, unless you specify, the results aren't always newest first. Best you use the 'search tools' button to narrow your results and freshen your stories see. Just sayin' hoss.
Protip #2: When you do find a story that suits your needs or bias, it is prudent to check the date of the article. Ya know, ya know what I mean?
Example:
Latest barry bs:
Obama Job Approval (Weekly)
p.s. We all know that voter approval (whether it's his shinyness, chinless steve or neckbeard thomas) is not the same as voter intention.
Have a happy day. :smile:
The polls have been ever so accurate on the Alberta and BC elections... Yep, those scienticians are a real credit to their industry
I would wager that the EKOS poll is more of a death warrant for baby-T than anything else.
I couldn't say it any better than Locutus.
:lol:... But thanks for the input all the same True Believer.:lol:
Ok I stand corrected, Sarge...:smile:
The common denominator , for the States, is the signs of a 'housekeeping second term'- Obama of course can't be re - elected. . His approval pattern looks like Fords, or Reagans, at aslightly lower level.
Which means that a strong Republican contender , like Cruz, can probably pull the party together for a new term.
A 'Mondale Republican' doesn't get in.
You are welcome. a good rule of Thumb is to take the EKOS poll and add 4-5 per cent for the incumbent.
But that is a matter for a 'Canadian Thread'. Starting one? Your turn...
You most certainly do stand corrected:smile:
Funny... All the pollsters got it wrong in the last 2 provincial elections, yet you still stick to your program.
Good luck on that and I guess that you stand a very strong chance of 'standing corrected' yet again
I s that your rather roundabout way of saying that you will not stoop to start a thread in the Canadian Politics sector?
No.
It' my way of telling you how wrong you were, and most likely, will be.
Hope that clears things up for ya
Ask that question of the pollsters.. Hunbolt has a lock on an excellent group that is never wrong
Mug wumping is not a pleasant sight, except to the mugwumper...
The jocular word mugwump, noted as early as 1832, is from Algonquian (Natick) mugquomp, "important person, kingpin" (from mugumquomp, "war leader")[1] implying that they were "sanctimonious" or "holier-than-thou,"[2] in holding themselves aloof from party politics. ( wiki)
Are we playing too rough for you?
hahaha.... Wasn't the Liberal party bankrupt (or damn close) not so long ago?
Hell, a few of their reps (present and/or former) still haven't paid their campaign debts. On top of that, they're playing second fiddle to the Dippers today.
Too funny - I'll bet that you have a make-shift shrine to the defunct Libs and baby-T somewhere in your place
Hell, a few of their reps (present and/or former) still haven't paid their campaign debts. On top of that, they're playing second fiddle to the Dippers today.
Too funny - I'll bet that you have a make-shift shrine to the defunct Libs and baby-T somewhere in your place
Yep. looks like this, right at the back of my Kwik- e - Mart.
some facial features transposed...