Jodi Arias speaks to jury, pleads for life

Do you think she will get LIFE or DEATH??

  • Life in Prison

    Votes: 8 61.5%
  • Death Sentence

    Votes: 5 38.5%

  • Total voters
    13

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
[/FONT]

If they're smart they'll keep the death penalty on the table so that life without parole is the palatable option, and life with a chance of parole never factors into the equation.


That would be the best outcome, IMO, Karrie with the proviso that she is never ever allowed in front of a reporter's camera again sparing the Alexander family from anymore of her self-serving interviews.

 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Yes, they do, at least in the USA.

O.J. Simpson was NOT guilty of murdering Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman as judged by criminal court jury. Yet a civil court jury held him legally responsible for their deaths.

A civil case has a lower burden of proof ..

The first O.J. Simpson trial was a joke. The jury ruled in direct opposition to the evidence. Judge Ito should have been thrown off the case.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
The first O.J. Simpson trial was a joke. The jury ruled in direct opposition to the evidence. Judge Ito should have been thrown off the case.

That's another HUGE part of why I oppose the death penalty.

Sentencing, and even conviction, have been proven to be subjective, and influenced by things like cultural background, affluence and looks much moreso than the actual crime committed. It makes the application of the death penalty an uneven, unfair system. Especially when known killers walk away due to fame and affluence.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,892
129
63
Do fingernails grow faster as you get older? It seems that way to me.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I agree 99% but it's good in cases where there is "smokin' gun" evidence or D.N.A.


Not when you consider that if you have a good looking rich person with a smoking gun, he's less likely to face the death penalty, than a poor ugly person with a smoking gun.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Naow, naow, 'the MAN' allegedly penetrated her, uhh, 'tushie' with one of his body parts.

That should win her full acquittal and a massive victim's settlement...

Tut tut, Gentlemen. we must not be cads when a maiden's honour is a stake...

such a deed ranks down there with pinning your Order of Lenin to your raincoat in order to mislead russian virgins...
Jodi Arias was empowered and wasn't going to let any man just use her and walk away. She decided to show him. Well, I guess she did show him.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca

Just the penalty phase is a mistrial..

 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Not when you consider that if you have a good looking rich person with a smoking gun, he's less likely to face the death penalty, than a poor ugly person with a smoking gun.

That is true, with all the high technology these days that irregularity can be abolished, you just feed all the facts into the computer and let the computer generate the sentence. You could get the bars icon, the rope icon or Ol' Smoky icon.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
That is true, with all the high technology these days that irregularity can be abolished, you just feed all the facts into the computer and let the computer generate the sentence. You could get the bars icon, the rope icon or Ol' Smoky icon.

The ethnicity would have to be added as African Americans are more likely to receive a harsher prison sentence than whites and at a substantially higher rate for the Death Penalty.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
That is true, with all the high technology these days that irregularity can be abolished, you just feed all the facts into the computer and let the computer generate the sentence. You could get the bars icon, the rope icon or Ol' Smoky icon.


Ah yes, wash our hands of the decision to kill someone. That would make it better.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
The ethnicity would have to be added as African Americans are more likely to receive a harsher prison sentence than whites and at a substantially higher rate for the Death Penalty.

For that very reason I would say ethnicity should be left out of it.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
For that very reason I would say ethnicity should be left out of it.
What purpose does the DP serve. I have listed 4 points
1 Does it prevent others from committing that same crime?
2 Is it enforced equally?
3 Is it cost effective?
4 Are innocent persons executed?

A yes or no is sufficient.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
What purpose does the DP serve. I have listed 4 points
1 Does it prevent others from committing that same crime?
2 Is it enforced equally?
3 Is it cost effective?
4 Are innocent persons executed?

A yes or no is sufficient.

  1. no
  2. no
  3. no
  4. yes
does it make us as a society more barbaric: yes
do victims feel a sense of closure: stats say no
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
  1. no
  2. no
  3. no
  4. yes
does it make us as a society more barbaric: yes
do victims feel a sense of closure: stats say no

Closure- My gawd do I despise that term. No such thing- To have complete closure would entail a memory dump.
Not gonna happen.
And I agree with your answers. Others may not, but they have much to learn yet.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
What purpose does the DP serve. I have listed 4 points
1 Does it prevent others from committing that same crime?
2 Is it enforced equally?
3 Is it cost effective?
4 Are innocent persons executed?

A yes or no is sufficient.

1. Yes, a few smart people would think twice.
2. It can be, within each jurisdiction.
3. Yes, if done properly
4. No if it's only used in cases where there is a smoking gun, D.N.A. and not for isolated offenses.
Actually it would be beneficial in some cases. In the David Milgaard case I doubt if he would have been convicted, knowing a conviction would result in a death sentence.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
1. Yes, a few smart people would think twice.
2. It can be, within each jurisdiction.
3. Yes, if done properly
4. No if it's only used in cases where there is a smoking gun, D.N.A. and not for isolated offenses.
Actually it would be beneficial in some cases. In the David Milgaard case I doubt if he would have been convicted, knowing a conviction would result in a death sentence.

Sorry, but 2, 3, and 4 are not reality. They're how you'd like to see it done, but not how it IS done.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,362
14,510
113
Low Earth Orbit
In a world were cops have to justify spending time and money on an investigation corners get cut, facts are created from fiction and convictions doled out all in the name of justifying the expense.

Who cares if it's only a minority being wrongfully convicted?

They are just a blight on society anyway and are better off in the pokey than collecting welfare or working illegally.. Right?