I can prove my family raised sheep in Colonsay...Should Britain compensate me for the sheep which are no longer there?
Did your family have an agreement with the British to pay for those sheep? If not, then there is no comparison.
I can prove my family raised sheep in Colonsay...Should Britain compensate me for the sheep which are no longer there?
Ok...are we talking individual towns or actual statistics.....?
Statistics (and logic) show that the more people you have in one place, the more crime you have. But! ( and here's the upside!) The more people you have, the more creation you have. The more debate you have, the more strength, defence and overall advancement you have.
So, are we talking cities? Or small towns that are mostly dying and used and the modern day "posts" for drugs?
In the Americas....ok, so that's both continents then? South America was much more populated than north, keep that in mind. So America has 300 million plus today, Canada has almost 40 million and South America including mexico ( and Mexico city with the largest city in the world) has probably anywhere from 500 million to 700 million............yes...........very close.You really don't know your history. May I suggest 1491, America before Columbus. It is based on the latest archaeological findings. In 1491 there were between 90 and 110 million people in the Americas. 90% died within the first 100 years of contact.
So because the British wouldn't negotiate with me I get nothing? So it's ok to be racist against a Gaelic person because he has no treaties? Holy **** reverse racism in its extreme right there!Did your family have an agreement with the British to pay for those sheep? If not, then there is no comparison.
****ing whitie is always wrong and always to blame.So because the British wouldn't negotiate with me I get nothing? So it's ok to be racist against a Gaelic person because he has no treaties? Holy **** reverse racism in its extreme right there!
What did YOU actually lose?So because the British wouldn't negotiate with me I get nothing? So it's ok to be racist against a Gaelic person because he has no treaties? Holy **** reverse racism in its extreme right there!
Ok, the first half could apply to every European nation. As for slavery....the natives had slaves....If you want to talk about a downtrodden people, talk about African Americans. Even Aboriginals had black slaves....so why do the slave owners deserve more because they have "treaties"?
The samething some 60 year old Native lost. NOTHING! You can't lose what is aleady gone.What did YOU actually lose?
Give the man a Cupie doll!The samething some 60 year old Native lost. NOTHING! You can't lose what is aleady gone.
What did current Aboriginals ACTUALLY lose?What did YOU actually lose?
My god...so blind.What did current Aboriginals ACTUALLY lose?
Don't tell the Spastics fans but I'm already boinking a CUPE doll.Give the man a Cupie doll!
So because the British wouldn't negotiate with me I get nothing? So it's ok to be racist against a Gaelic person because he has no treaties? Holy **** reverse racism in its extreme right there!
You sort of sidestepped the point. If you were the actual loser, in a perfect world, you would be compensated.What did current Aboriginals ACTUALLY lose?
And when they have the capacity to manage those lands, they can be the caretakers again. Until then, that just isn't going to happen and ****ing Whitie will continue to be the caretakers.Another idiot that has a problem understanding the law. The First Nations in Canada have both written and verbal agreements. It's not my fault or their fault that the brits screwed your ancestors. The British Crown did not "conquer" the First Nations. They made agreements for the land. Those agreements have been recognized by not only the SCOC but also internationally as well.
Which of course are the reasons for the Idol No More movement.But that does not detract from a number of facts
Poor to contaminated water.
Drug and alcohol abuse
Highest rates for certain diseases- Diabetes is one
Gangs that are operating on reserves that the band is powerless to confront or refuses to confront
Lands that cross borders at one time were used to smuggle cigarettes. They are now used for drugs, guns and other things. this has to be addressed..
Locations of reserves-
Corruption
Housing that is not even close to 3rd world
The US against them Culture
Treaties could be renegotiated - each region and band has differing needs and grievances.
Just a few points.
Good to hear you're seeing things in the light of day.
It's funny though on who ALL explorers relied on for information.Cliffy that is ridiculous. North America was found with almost no people. A few hundred thousand natives couldn't possibly govern or even understand the size of the continent. Resources? even the Europeans couldn't know what resources there were, other than trapping, timber, and the more obvious mining opportunities that weren't exploited for decades. Living with Europeans was a mean, cultural shock for the indiginous aboriginals to face.