Who Wrote The New Army Manual? NAMBLA?

Locutus

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
via BCF

Proposed Army manual tells G.I.s not to insult Taliban, speak up for women



A proposed new handbook for Americans serving in Afghanistan warns them not to speak ill about the Taliban, advocate women’s rights or criticize pedophilia, and the general in charge is not happy with it.

The draft of the newest Army handbook seems to suggest that ignorance of Afghan culture is to blame for deadly attacks by Afghan soldiers against the coalition forces, according to The Wall Street Journal, which got a peek at the 75-page document. But its message of walking on eggshells around the locals is not going over well with U.S. Marine Gen. John Allen, the top military commander in Afghanistan.


more


Army handbook instructs U.S. GIs not to speak up for women's rights or condemn pedophilia in Afghanistan | Mail Online


Proposed Army manual tells G.I.s not to insult Taliban, speak up for women | Fox News
 
H

Highball

Council Member
Jan 28, 2010
1,170
1
38
General Allen has some valid points. And NAMBLA is still active and has a large membership in the Bay Area of California. Rumor has it Jerry Brown may be a Honorary Life Member too along with Assemblyman Mark Leno.
 
damngrumpy

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Let me get this straight, we went to Afghanistan to bring democracy and put the Taliban
in their place, which is in hell by the way.
Democracy means people should stand up to equal rights period women's or other wise.
Isn't pedophilia a crime by any civilized standard? Who are the people that hide in the
darkened shadows writing books about making friends with the devil so we won't offend
them?
I say its time to enforce the laws and principals we went there to correct and if they don't
like it too bloody bad. Imagine spending all that money and preaching all that hot air and
then about why we're there and then fly in the face of everything we stand for.
 
T

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
tay said:
Geez......you would think if the Foxxy news story was true, they would post a link to their copy of this manual in their story..........

Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling | Media Reform | CeaseSPIN.org
Click to expand...

- tay ... You are quite a piece of work. Indeed, when the Pictionary refers to "the unatic left wing fringe" your picture appears beside the phrase.

- The story you dismiss as a Fox News lie was actually carried first as an article in The Wall Street Journal. Of course the WSJ can't compete for your affections beside Izvestia and Pravda (sorry they are now defunct and you must resort to CNBCNews and similar left wing propoganda peddlars for your, err, "insights") but for less ideologically bent readers, the WSJ is among the most credible newspapers in the English speaking world.

- And the Fox legal argument you cite is from NINE YEARS AGO AND HAS NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THIS DRAFT ARMY MANUAL.

- Let me try the mission impossible of explaining the context of the draft army manual to you. It was written by opportunistic careerist bureacrats in the Pentagon so as to be politicallly correct and to correspond to the Obama lies about Al Qaeda being decimated and powerless and on the run, the war on terrorism being essentially over having been won by Dear Leader Obama, the war in Afghanistan being waged with great success under BO's leadership, the Arab World being democratized rather than radicalized thanks to BO's apology tour and other appeasement approaches to the Islamists, and other patently absurd and obvious lies currently being peddled by your hero Obama. It is for the same pro-BO propoganda reasons that Dear Leader and his sycophants and fart catchers peddled the disgraceful lies entailed in the subsequent cover up of the Benghazi scandals before, during and after the attack on the consulate there until the facts made peddling this story too ridiculous even for the almost always pro-Obama and always pro-left lib MSM.
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,362
14,510
113
Low Earth Orbit
That A or R has rivets.

Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur [1998]
  • Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the National Security Adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
  • Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
  • Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
  • Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
  • Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
  • Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
  • Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [integrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
  • Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
  • Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
  • Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom