You mean 4 years of failure, economic collapse and ineffectiveness.
Not as I see it, did you miss some of the news or is it a little selective amnesia? :lol:
You mean 4 years of failure, economic collapse and ineffectiveness.
Not as I see it, did you miss some of the news or is it a little selective amnesia?
Let's see... A falling GDP, trillions in new debt over the last 4 years, 8+% unemployment, a marginal (if non-existant) recovery in the housing market and major corps looking to relocate offshore.
:lol:That sound like a strong economy to you?:lol::lol::lol:
Let's see...............where in the world is the economy on the upswing? A health coverage plan, Bin Laden hors d' combat, Auto industry back on their feet, unemployment at lowest point in years.
You just described the past 40 yearsLet's see... A falling GDP, trillions in new debt over the last 4 years, 8+% unemployment, a marginal (if non-existant) recovery in the housing market and major corps looking to relocate offshore.
:lol:That sound like a strong economy to you?:lol::lol::lol:
You mean 4 years of failure, economic collapse and ineffectiveness.
Lemme ask you, would you seek to have a brain surgeon with a 4 year track record of killing his patients do the delicate work on your surgery?![]()
![]()
![]()
- Anyone who even occasionally reads this board or other boards on political developments and issues will certainly not be surprised to learn that the liberals are generally much more lightweight than are the conservatives when it
You just described the past 40 years
No one has assumed as much debt per capita as the USA... Like Romney mentioned, they are on the road to becoming the next Greece.
Bin Laden is dead, right along with the 4 US diplomats in Libya.
Auto industry is alive (barely) but mfgrs and corps are withering on the vine in the States.
Unemployment 'highest in years'?.... Funny, that's like saying the herpes I got a few years back isn't so bad because I'm getting used to the lesions now.....
Get a grip man
My bad... You did say that.
Regardless, my comment still applies
I think you and I are going to have to agree to disagree (I don't believe in making enemies over politics) Just watch Mass. on election night, when the victor is declared there, that's the end of the "ballgame"!
What does Massachusetts have to do with anything?.. Just because it Romney's home state?
In the end, you had mentioned the other day that Romney would lose key states and referred to Florida as one of them. As of yesterday's polls, it looks like he'll be taking Florida.
That said, and I say this respectfully, your predictions thus far have been 'less than accurate'
A lot, Romney must have it to ensure a victory.
How can my predictions be less than accurate before Nov. 6? :lol:
Obama chides Romney on foreign policy in debate - World - CBC News
Add up the "safes" and "likelies" and I think you'll get the picture! :icon_smile:
I don't trust Google for that, or much else, I don't even use its search engine anymore. The latest Kaspersky Internet Security Suite tells me the site is not safe, I'm not going there.
Is there an unwritten rule that the President MUST win Massachusetts in order to win the election?
Kinda makes you wonder why they involve the rest of the nation at all.
You just watch, the winner of Mass. will win the election.
I see, so this election is also, exclusively about Foreign Policy... Gotcha
Here's an extra smilie just for you!
![]()
captain morgan;1662705 Ummm said:http://forums.canadiancontent.net/images/icons/icon12.gif[/IMG]![]()
![]()
So, we're to just take your word for it, eh?
lol From what I've seen so far, neither candidate's party has been devoid of morons.