That was 23 years ago, and Iraq didn't have the ability to strike back. Iran has an arsenal of missiles capable of reaching Israel.Worked in 81
Trench also warfare worked in WWI, but the French Marginot Line was a fiasco in in WW II.
That was 23 years ago, and Iraq didn't have the ability to strike back. Iran has an arsenal of missiles capable of reaching Israel.Worked in 81
Everyone is going to have nuclear weapons sooner or later. The more nuclear weapons states that exist the less viable the doctrine of mutually assured destruction becomes.The NPT is a joke. The US is one of the worst offenders. More nukes than you can fit in a small state and will never dismantle any of them guaranteed. Israel is just as bad but at least they didn't sign onto the thing.
My belief is that either everyone can have all the nukes they want or nobody has any. This BS of the US having tons while telling anyone who isn't an ally they can't have them needs to stop. America is not the parent of the world nor the policeman.
We should just gather up all of them but one and send them on a 1 way trip to Pluto. The last one can be used to destroy any machines or equipment used to manufacture the stupid things.
Who are you talking to?That was 23 years ago, and Iraq didn't have the ability to strike back. Iran has an arsenal of missiles capable of reaching Israel.
Trench also warfare worked in WWI, but the French Marginot Line was a fiasco in in WW II.
"Iran isnt in compliance with its disclosure obligations under the NNPT. " How?Perception is all that matters. The world doesn't operate by narrow Western legalisms. Iran has successfully gamed the system in the opinion of others. So obviously the non-proliferation treaty can be gamed. Thus, there's no reason others can't successfully play the same game.
Btw, Iran isnt in compliance with its disclosure obligations under the NNPT. There are going to be many more nuclear weapons states. I bet that really hurts folks on the left who want a nuclear free world.
That was 23 years ago, and Iraq didn't have the ability to strike back. Iran has an arsenal of missiles capable of reaching Israel.
.
later Iraq fired some primitive scuds at Israel with limited effect.
... but Iran is a completely different ball game. They have solid fuel missiles which are mobile and can be fired quickly. I suspect that Iran will be able to inflict real pain on Israel.
later Iraq fired some primitive scuds at Israel with limited effect.
... but Iran is a completely different ball game. They have solid fuel missiles which are mobile and can be fired quickly. I suspect that Iran will be able to inflict real pain on Israel.
That was 23 years ago, and Iraq didn't have the ability to strike back. Iran has an arsenal of missiles capable of reaching Israel.
Trench also warfare worked in WWI, but the French Marginot Line was a fiasco in in WW II.
I doubt Iran would attack the US targets unless they were attacked by the US. I doubt Iran would attack the US if the US just allowed Israeli war planes to pass through US controlled airspace to drop "Made in the USA" bombs. Iran would likely target just Israel and try to avoid drawing the US into the conflict. I would expect Iran to fire many missiles towards Israel at once in response and then wait for Israel's reaction. If Israel fires back with conventional weapons, then I would expect a tit for tat exchange to go on. If Israel or anyone else uses a nuclear weapon of any type against Iran, I would expect Iran would clandestinely develop nuclear weapons and announce their possession of nukes with a test. Likely Iran has many empty caves, not all of which are known outside Iran and many warehouses of spare parts... Also I would expect every piece of heavy equipment in Iran to start digging...Like the blind firing into cities? Most likely.
They would be very foolish to target US bases in the area after Israel pummels them. Then their military will be set back quite a few years.
Link pleaseBut they're not threatening to bomb anyone, right?
So what does this mean: "In circumstances in which they (the Israelis) have prepared everything for an attack, it is possible that we will make a pre-emptive attack."
Isn't that a threat to bomb someone?
There are going to be many more nuclear weapons states.
I bet that really hurts folks on the left who want a nuclear free world.
Almost at the top....
![]()
Draghi, Papademos, Monti: All come from Goldman Sachs.
They are going to fix Europe!
I'm very confident!
I prefer the guys with the nukes not be in a position where they might fall to a bunch of religious zealots. Much as some might hate the US and Russia they managed to keep a cap on their silo's. And I guess I should end this post by saying that Japan could have avoided being bombed if they'd stuck their hands in the air like the Germans.
I can't see the top but I can game it up. Logically there has to be a top because(for this example anyway) there's a bottom. They only stay at the top if they remain hidden. Ten thousand years of gaming the planet has provided near unbeatable security and a ruthlessness commoners like us cannot even imagine. But these lids and suits don't always win so stay happy. I'm quite certain that they are absolutely necessary to the natural scheme of things as well. They fuel the half curve known as the good times. And we fuel the half known as the bad. Eternally at war, that is as clear as up and down. If everyone knows good that isn't good.
Hi how are you, fine I hope.
1. religious zealots already control the biggest stockpile ever.
2. they may have kept their silos capped but they distributed fissile material by hook and crook
3. Japan was nuked as a warning to any and all who had inclinations to do their own things, just plain large scale murder
4. many millions of Germans were butchered and starved in the camps after the war, the first two years were hell
You left out "But we do not see this at the moment.”
That's not a threat. Its a warning to Israel not to create a tense situation which could lead Iranian war planners to believe the war was about to begin.
Iraq was an unprovoked war crime.