Ford tries to clarify his comments on gun criminals and immigration

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,892
129
63
All this confusion could have been avoided by enacting one prerequisite for being mayor of cities over 30 people- an I.Q. of 4 or greater!
You talking about Miller?

Geez, with all the negative comments on Ford, I've just down graded his I.Q. to 3! :lol:
He's much richer than you.
 

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
I think FOrd is on the right tract even though he has dumpy's wonderful way with words. As Canadians we should be able to deport any immigrant convicted of a gun crime from our country.
As a landlord you are permitted, in fact almost required to evict a tenant for illegal activities in a rental property so why not evict convicted criminals from your city and country?
The safety of law abiding citizens trumps any perceived rights of a criminal. Especially murderers.

That is a quite strange analogy but it does not obscure the fault with your case. You are adding to the misinformation that says gun criminals are (necessarily?) immigrants. And also the implication made by some that they are Black immigrants.

This whole affair is something that some warned would happen. Years ago there were studies of the problems of disadvantaged youth and recommendations for action. Nothing has been done and. indeed, the causal conditions have worsened with the Right Wing ideology that has gripped society.

It will get worse yet if we, as a society, do not wake up. The easy accessibility of guns from our barbaric neighbour makes that inevitable. When the laissez faire attitude to social organisation of this federal government is added, then the explosion will follow. Cancelling the Gun Registry was just a facilitating step.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
That is a quite strange analogy but it does not obscure the fault with your case. You are adding to the misinformation that says gun criminals are (necessarily?) immigrants. And also the implication made by some that they are Black immigrants.

This whole affair is something that some warned would happen. Years ago there were studies of the problems of disadvantaged youth and recommendations for action. Nothing has been done and. indeed, the causal conditions have worsened with the Right Wing ideology that has gripped society.

It will get worse yet if we, as a society, do not wake up. The easy accessibility of guns from our barbaric neighbour makes that inevitable. When the laissez faire attitude to social organisation of this federal government is added, then the explosion will follow. Cancelling the Gun Registry was just a facilitating step.

You have really poor comprehension skills. I said nothing about immigrants being criminals any more than the rest of the population. Only that we have a better way of protecting ourselves from the criminal element that come here than from the home grown variety.

We are still fixing the ills caused by a generation of socialist ideology that has caused so many problems in our society.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Ford tries to clarify his comments on gun criminals and immigration

After telling a talk radio interviewer on Wednesday night that he wanted to ask the Prime Minister how Canada’s immigration laws might help him evict convicted gun criminals from Toronto, Mayor Rob Ford called in to another local talk radio station Thursday night to clarify his remarks. He spoke to the hosts of Newstalk 1010’s Friendly Fire on Thursday night. Here is a transcript of the interview.

Mr. Ford: I have called the Prime Minister to find out if there’s any laws with respect to the immigration and citizenship status in the city.

So if people are caught, I don’t care if you’re white, pink or purple, I don’t care what country you’re from, I don’t care if you’re a Canadian citizen or not, all I’m saying is if you’re caught with a gun and convicted of a gun crime, I want you out of this city. And the portfolio for the cabinet minister is immigration and citizenship. I don’t think the other half of my statement came out quite clearly. It has nothing to do particularly with immigration or where you come from, which I think John was trying to say, all I want to do is get information, which I’m not an expert on and I’m sure nobody is until we talk to the minister and I can only get that information though the Prime Minister’s office.

So I put a call into the PMO to get that information. Maybe, you know, maybe we don’t have a leg to stand on. But I’m going to do everything in my power to find out, you know, if we can get rid of these people when they get out of jail. I don’t want to live in this city. I just want to clarify the same portfolio is called immigration and citizenship, it’s not just immigration.

Host: So what do you mean? Could you clarify in terms of the citizenship angle here. Are you suggesting that you want to revoke citizenship? Or what is it…

Mr. Ford: No, maybe you can clarify things John, with me. When you have a status in a country, what portfolio does that fall under? Your address. Your date of birth. Your country of origin. I’m pretty sure it falls under citizenship.

Host: If, if you’re Canadian born?

Mr. Ford: Well, obviously your status is obviously under Canadian.

Host: When would a Canadian citizen, like yourself, for example – you were born in this country ...

Mr. Ford: Right.

Host: …When did you ever deal with immigration and citizenship?

Mr. Ford: Aw, anytime. If you get in problems in another country, they try to look at your status, I’m saying ...

Host: That’s Foreign Affairs.

Mr. Ford: OK, whoever it may be, that’s what I’m saying. Maybe I’m not an expert on, you know, the ministries, but I’m saying that if it’s foreign affairs or immigration and citizenship, I want to talk to the PMO to find out if we can – and maybe we can’t. But I’m just trying to clarify that if you’re caught with a gun and convicted of a gun crime, I do not want you living in this city any more. To find out that information you have to go through the PMO, and that’s what I’m doing. So, I’m not an expert in this but I’m trying to resolve the issue that’s at hand.

Host: Mayor Ford, just to be clear here, we’re not talking about you having any inside information as to knowing the immigration status of the suspected shooter, or anything to that effect.

Mr. Ford: No, it has nothing to do with that. All I’m saying is I think people have had enough. When I walk through I call that war zone on Monday morning, I was mad. I was upset at the beginning, but I was mad because I said this is not the city we live in. I said I’ll do anything in my power to deal with this issue.

A lot of people just said, “Rob, why are they living in this city?” No matter who they are, I don’t care if you’re Canadian born, a Canadian citizen. I don’t care if you’re an immigrant, I don’t care if you’re refugee; it doesn’t matter to me. If you’re convicted of a gun crime, I do not want you living in this city. And the only way I can find out whether that’s legal or not or whether we can enforce that is through the PMO, and that’s what I’m doing.

So, I’m meeting with the Premier on Monday to deal with funding for TAVIS and hopefully next week I’ll be meeting with the Prime Minister. So I just want to clarify that because what I heard driving home is not, is not what I said.

Toronto Mayor Ford tries to clarify his comments on gun criminals and immigration - The Globe and Mail

So if I understand clearly, he's proposing we introduce local-exilation laws, whereby if convicted of a crime, once time is served you can never go back to the city in which the crime was committed? Or is he proposing that the exilaiton laws replace imprisionment? A kind of NIMBY policy? If it has nothing to do with foreigners but rather with criminals in general, am I getting this right? And would this not conflict with the constitutional right of a Canadian to traveland find work in any part of Canada he wants if not in prison?

Could get complicated here.

And if that's the case, it's probably the Minister of Justice he's talking about.

Sounds like he is looking for any legal path or "loophole" that would alow Toronto or Canada to deport these murderers. If they came from the UK, Sweeded, Bulgaria or Jamaica.. Im in agreement,,, If there is a way to get them out of Canada, perfecto..

Caught with a gun? Your not a Citizen? Ok, out you go! We ALL know that the sentencing for these crimes is minimal. I agree, I would rather turf them out than clog the legal system or fill the jails.

Actually, he was talking about kicking them out of the city, not the country. Plus he said it had nothing to do with whether the criminal were a citizen or not. For citizens, that has nothing to do with immigration. Again, from what I was reading, it sounds like ford is proposing local-exilation laws.

It sure sounds to me like hes hinting at deporting them. His "Out of the City" and talk about imigration policies kind of lends it to deportation does it not? Would you support the deportation of anyone illegally carrying a gun while not a Citizen of Canada?

he made it clear he was not referring to citizenship, so clearly he was referring to Canadian-born criminals too, which has nothing to do with immigration. Why he'd think Immigration and citizenship would be responsible for exiling Canadian-born criminals is beyond me. That's clearly the responsibility of the Minister of Justice.
 

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
You have really poor comprehension skills. I said nothing about immigrants being criminals any more than the rest of the population. Only that we have a better way of protecting ourselves from the criminal element that come here than from the home grown variety.

We are still fixing the ills caused by a generation of socialist ideology that has caused so many problems in our society.

You may not be grasping the implication of your own words. You talk of deporting immigrants convicted of gun crimes without considering the complexity of just that question alone (which need not be gone into since it distracts from the purpose of the discussion.)

This is not about criminality among some immigrants. It is about gun crime in Canada; the bulk of which is perpetrated by native born citizens. That needs to be the focus.

To add the gratuitous "caused by a generation of socialist ideology" hardly merits response. It is a singularly foolish assertion when the problem stems from the refusal to do what socialism demands.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Socialism doesn't demand it at gunpoint....

You mention the bulk of gun crime in Canada is perpetuated by native born Canadians. Toronto, though it IS in Canada, is NOT Canada. Previously, the hoods of Rexdale, Jane-Finch and Weston-Mount Dennis were brought up. Have you ever noticed the high percentage of Dominican Republican, Jamaican and Haitian folk?
 

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
Socialism doesn't demand it at gunpoint....

You mention the bulk of gun crime in Canada is perpetuated by native born Canadians. Toronto, though it IS in Canada, is NOT Canada. Previously, the hoods of Rexdale, Jane-Finch and Weston-Mount Dennis were brought up. Have you ever noticed the high percentage of Dominican Republican, Jamaican and Haitian folk?
This has been noticeable. What also is noticeable is that they are usually native born Canadians. Those denied the promise of Canada and forced into that underclass or subculture of the deprived and hopeless.

What is alos noticeable is that Ontario, where most of thes live, is below the national average in violent crime.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
This has been noticeable. What also is noticeable is that they are usually native born Canadians. Those denied the promise of Canada and forced into that underclass or subculture of the deprived and hopeless.

What is alos noticeable is that Ontario, where most of thes live, is below the national average in violent crime.
Who cares about averages? You only die once....
 

Redmonton_Rebel

Electoral Member
May 13, 2012
442
0
16
Ford is well out of his depth in the shallow end.

I do not see that as over the top. This man, Ford, is an imbecile. He does not even understand the implications of the growing gun incidents. He has no conception of why youth becomes antisocial. These things have been studied to death and there has been no shortage of recommendations for dealing with it. Few have been implemented. With each "Conservative" administration at every level there are further steps backward.

Ford thinks we should deport the perpetrators without knowing who the perpetrators are or what their citizenship. He thinks that and a few jobs that he has no idea how to create will make Toronto a Happy-go-lucky, fun place to be. (Lack of transit apart; and unaffordable housing apart) He even thinks that Stephen Harper will care!

As for the last mayor, he was a brilliant man and the city was heading in the Right direction with him. Since I don't live there. I do not know all the details of what each has achieved and there have been some bozos. But none like this one.

I think "tough love" is just conservative code for "we couldn't care less about anybody who isn't us".

It didn't used to be like that, I remember Robert Stanfield as being one of the classiest, honorable politicians of his day...or any day.
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
I think "tough love" is just conservative code for "we couldn't care less about anybody who isn't us".

It didn't used to be like that, I remember Robert Stanfield as being one of the classiest, honorable politicians of his day...or any day.

How many conservatives were shot at that BBQ? Is that what's got Ford upset? That conservatives were shot at the BBQ?
 

Redmonton_Rebel

Electoral Member
May 13, 2012
442
0
16
How many conservatives were shot at that BBQ? Is that what's got Ford upset? That conservatives were shot at the BBQ?

That's not the issue here.

The issue is there's highly complex factors that have brought us to this point as a society, and Ford's simplistic and highly biased response goes against not just our laws but the traditions of this country. One of the reasons that there is so much violence is the exclusion of groups that already were marginalized. Pushing people to the side and expecting them to go away is a hopeless approach to social issues.

The mayor of a city isn't a sovereign, something Ford seems to have a tough time understanding.
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
I don't think it's complex at all. You shoot people we don't want you around. Period. Cry all the rivers you want about being marginalized. Canada bends over backwards to be inclusive. If you consider yourself marginalized here, you're likely doing something wrong.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I don't think it's complex at all. You shoot people we don't want you around. Period. Cry all the rivers you want about being marginalized. Canada bends over backwards to be inclusive. If you consider yourself marginalized here, you're likely doing something wrong.

Honestly I'm not necessarily opposed to exiling a criminal from the city where the crime was perpetrated. Just be aware this is what ford is proposing though.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Honestly I'm not necessarily opposed to exiling a criminal from the city where the crime was perpetrated. Just be aware this is what ford is proposing though.

Yep, much better to make him/her someone else's problem!
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
So if I understand clearly, he's proposing we introduce local-exilation laws, whereby if convicted of a crime, once time is served you can never go back to the city in which the crime was committed?
Nope, he wants to know if there is a law or legal way to do it.

You may not be grasping the implication of your own words. You talk of deporting immigrants convicted of gun crimes without considering the complexity of just that question alone (which need not be gone into since it distracts from the purpose of the discussion.)
There's nothing complex about it. In fact, there's already legislation enforcing it.

This is not about criminality among some immigrants. It is about gun crime in Canada; the bulk of which is perpetrated by native born citizens. That needs to be the focus.
No, the focus is, as \\fuzzy wanted, a hate fest for Ford.

It is a singularly foolish assertion when the problem stems from the refusal to do what socialism demands.
I agree. And that started with poor policies enacted by PET, that allowed poor, uneducated people flood the inner city, without the necessary services and support to assist them.

Blaming everyone after the fact is a cop out.

This has been noticeable. What also is noticeable is that they are usually native born Canadians. Those denied the promise of Canada and forced into that underclass or subculture of the deprived and hopeless.
What a load of shyte.

I'm from an 'underclass', I know scores of people from an 'underclass', that simply know right from wrong, or that if they work hard enough they will succeed.

That's not the issue here.

The issue is there's highly complex factors that have brought us to this point as a society, and Ford's simplistic and highly biased response goes against not just our laws but the traditions of this country.
What laws does Ford's request for information go against?

One of the reasons that there is so much violence is the exclusion of groups that already were marginalized.
What a load of shyte.
Pushing people to the side and expecting them to go away is a hopeless approach to social issues.
Pushing inner city groups to the side?

Try being Native on land that has resources.

Then come back and talk to me about being pushed aside.

The mayor of a city isn't a sovereign, something Ford seems to have a tough time understanding.
Another delusional accusation.

Yep, much better to make him/her someone else's problem!
So you agree with Ford's erroneous position.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Honestly I'm not necessarily opposed to exiling a criminal from the city where the crime was perpetrated. Just be aware this is what ford is proposing though.

Yep, much better to make him/her someone else's problem!
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
We heard you the first time.

I find it odd that you agreed with Ford though. Especially given the fact that you rate his IQ so low.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67

Quite a 'blasting' :lol: :

Liberal MP John McKay, whose Scarborough riding was rocked by the shooting, said Kenney should have known better than to echo anything said by Ford, whom he accused of fanning "the flames of ignorance and prejudice."



Honorable Johnny looks like a pretty cool dude though eh.