Who said anything about invading the country? NATO could easily reign massive destruction from the air without having to lay a boot into Iran.
I'm in no mood for another war but Iran seems intent on going that route.
Which would accomplish what? Create more images of dead children on TV? Make millions of Iranians angry? Solidify Iranian cleric control? Nothing short of an invasion/occupation can stop the Iranian from doing what they want. So far, they claim they don't want nuclear weapons. Until I see evidence which contradicts their statements, and they continue to allow IAEA inspections of their nuclear sites, we should accept their word that they have no intention of building nuclear weapons. A bombing campaign would probably change their minds about the deterrence value of nukes.
Iran could build nuclear weapons, but it would violate their NPT agreements. I am aware that Iran's adversaries don't respect the NPT, but Iran does respect all mandatory parts and the voluntary parts that it ratified.... so far.Just how do you guage their intentions? Is it because they are not bowing down to lick the boots of the oh-so-great USA and give up their sovereignty to comply with western demands and interference.
Iran is a sovereign nation and has every right under international law to govern itself how it sees fit and even produce nuclear weapons if it wants. No other country has the right to say different.
Iranians, like Canadians are proud of their nuclear program. They've had no serious accidents and they've mastered most nuclear technologies except nuclear weapons. If the US and Israel threatened Canada over our peaceful nuclear program, we'd probably react about the same way as the Iranians.