What would YOU want to hear at church?

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
;-) Why doesn't that surprise me? Thrice I have bonked thee with thine own book and thrice thee hast logged out and departed post haste without addressing thine bruised backside....

(or the kiss thou hast promised for mine)
 

Omicron

Privy Council
Jul 28, 2010
1,694
3
38
Vancouver
If you walked into a Christian church off the street, what question would you like to hear answered?

Hmm...

Okay, how about this for starters:

When I was young, Anglo-American Evangelical/Baptist/Pentecostal types harped against masturbation.

They justified their position by referring to the story of Onan in the Book of Genesis Chapter 38.

Onan's brother had died, so his father ordered him to take over the duty of making his brother's wife pregnant, so she would have family to take care of her in old age (they didn't have social security, and people back then knew that women live longer than men).

Onan pulled out before climaxing, thus spilling his seed on the ground, so God killed him for not giving Tamar kids to help her in old age.

What in the world does that have to do with masturbation?!? What I know is that if I'm trying to study scripture and my mind keeps drifting off to images of sexual hotties, that it helps me to get re-focused by taking the 15 minutes required to get bodily concerns out of my head.

Did you know that some of the extreme branches of Essene-Judaism forbade having a bowel movement on the Sabbath, because that was considered to be work by some of their Gamma-level leaders? Maybe they had low-fibre diets, such that constipation was the norm for the time, in which case a bowel movement could be thought of as work, but if a person has the trots, isn't it more work to hold it in?

Another question I would ask is this:

Why in the world do Evangelical/Baptist/Pentacostalites get hung up on strict interpretation of the Creation story of Genesis, when it's already heck of a lot more in-line with what really happened than any other myth.

Does it say an otter swam down to the bottom of a cosmic sea, scooped some mud in its paws, brought that to the surface and formed it into continents? No!

Does it say the world is flat and is riding on the back of a turtle? No!

That Creation story was written before people knew the world was round and before the sciences of cosmology and evolution existed, yet notice how the only thing anyone can find to pick about it is the time-line?

If you think about the technology and scientific understanding available to goat-herders at the time, it's frankly amazing they got it so close.

Pretend you're Moses talking to God, getting ready to write the Pentateuch.

M: "Okay, how did it start?"

G: "I forced an imbalance between the distribution of mass and charge among the virtual particles that pop in and out of existence within the limits of a narrow time-window of uncertainty, such that they could not collapse back into nothingness, resulting in positive charge being loaded up on the side of the heavy mass of protons, while negative charge got carried by near weightless electrons, such that they could not cancel out, and therefore had to stick around. "

M: "Huh?"

G: "It was a way to force something to come out of nothing. The mass/charge imbalance was concentrated into an infinitesimally small space, so once it was there it has to expand like a big explosion."

M: "Explosion... like when a volcano goes off?"

G: "Yeah, only bigger. If you'd been around, it would have looked like a blinding flash of light."

M: "Ahh... so You mean... In the Beginning, There Was Light, and You were the one who said Let it Be."

G: "Yeah, I guess... if that's how you want to put it."

M: "What next?"

G: "Well... for the next 300,000 years it expanded as a soupy mess of quarks, until it finally cooled down enough for them to collapse into atoms."

M: "Quarks?"

G: "The building blocks of hadrons, two of which are protons and neutrons, which form the nucleus of atoms."

M: "What are atoms?"

G: "The basic building blocks of matter as you know it... the stuff your bodies are made of... think of it as being like very fine dust..."

M: "We're made of dust?"

G: "We'll get to that. Anyway, the point is, at first it was a hot soupy mess of quarks, which eventually cooled down enough to form hadrons, which cooled down enoughtto form atoms, which were then able to form into stars and planets, like the sun and the moon, which are a star and a planet."

M: "Was this hot soupy mess bright?"

G: "Yes... very much so. It would have blinded you if it hadn't been so hot as to vaporize you before your eyeballs had the time to be blinded."

M: "So first there was light, and then later on came the sun and the moon."

G: "Yeah... pretty much."

M: "Okay..." <scribble scribble scribble> "Then what?"

G: "Well, galaxy's and solar systems and planets formed through long complicated processes involving lots of chaotic interactions between atomic dust particles, but eventually they coagulated into planetary orbs. The first planets were all liquid, but eventually it got cool enough for solid planets for to form. It had been like a cloud without form, but after hundreds of millions of years the coalesced into planets with land, and above them sky."

M: "So you mean like: 'Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: And God called the firmament Heaven. And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas'".

G: "You're very poetic."

M: "I have to be. The people I'm leading out of Egypt tend not to translate information into right-action unless it goes through their hearts."

G: "Are you sure you can make a better kingdom out of that?"

M: "I studied all the teachings of the collected wisdom of Egypt gathered over a thousand years, and anyone could do it if they get the enforcement of leadership and discipline right. My older brother is a jerk, and he won't let me live down the fact that I was adopted, plus he's too stupid and culturally anal-retentive to get over thinking like dry-humping a clay avatar is the same as making love to a god."

G: "Whatever... can we get onto what I'm going to need to see in people in order to want to spend the extra energy required to keep their souls alive after their bodies die? That is, after-all, what we came together to originally talk about... right?"

M: "After we finish up how it all started and how we got here... where were we...."

G: "We left off at how planets condensed out of the nebular gas surrounding newly formed stars, such that there was now a clear distinction between heaven and earth. The most important thing was whether or not the planet had the right temperature for liquid water. No liquid water, no life. There had to be a planet with a hard surface capable of maintaining a gravitational field strong enough to hold down water from evaporating away, and warm enough for that water to stay liquid."

M: "I already wrote that... then what?"

G: "Well, life blossomed in the seas, but the first forms to make it onto dry land were plants."

M: "So, like... 'Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind."

G: "Did your older brother the Pharaoh get annoyed with your performance in poetry classes?"

M: "Why?"

G: "Never mind, the point is, first the seas blossomed with life, and then plants worked onto land. Then there were amphibians, reptiles, and the amazing dinosaurs."

M: "Dinosaurs?"

G: "Sort of like big giant birds without feathers. They totally dominated for hundreds of millions of years."

M: "Ahh... so... 'Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind'".

G: "Okay, sort of... except whales didn't come along until after the extinction of the dinosaurs. Sharks were the first big permanent Pisces predator."

M: "My readers can barely tell the difference between whales and sharks. Whales they respect, while sharks they fear. Let it be whales."

G: <rolleyes> "Whatever, as long as eventually this gets to the point of explaining to humans what I must see in terms of attitude for Me to spend the energy keeping their souls alive after their body's die. You do understand that eventually they're going to be able to tell the difference."

M: "Next!"

G: "Can the bad manners or the next day Yours Truly is going to find some other well-educated radical from some royal family on this planet to guid your souls toward living forever while I get stronger with the addition of each of you to me like a braincell being added to a mind with each one while you don't become food if not help for mentalities making a living out of eating entropic decline."

M: "huh?"

G: "Uhh... infinity is hard to explain, but just get it for now that within infinity can be fungus. Very powerful because it does not have to align within the rules of photosynthesis."

M: "Huh?"

G: <sigh> "Next were mammals. Cattle, etc."

M: <scribble scribble scribble>

G: "Then finally came you. That's why it was started. Odds were one out of 18 trillion planets would make a random-chaos quantum dust-thinker, which is why I am going to be very annoyed if you don't pull through. If Lucifer wins it's all fungus, which cannot photosynthesize."

M: "Cannot he eat vegetables?"

G: "Nope."

M: "Creepy. Anyway, where were we..."

G: "Long story short... you got more neo-cortex in your brains than limbic system... like bottle-nose dolphins, African elephants, and Bonobo chimpanzees. If you get too smart you might drift."

M: "Drift how?"

G: "Drift away from the way... a way... that will for sure keep you alive. Go that way, and you are going to be playing in Lucifer's playground."

M: "What happens then?"

G: "It's hard to explain, because you Moses are post-apple, but there was a time when humans were as impossible for Lucifer to control as puppets as it is impossible for that piece of hyper-fungus to control cats and dogs now. Like all fungus they have the most powerful biochemistry because they are not constrained by photosynthesis... but like all fungus they die without something else able to photosynthesize."

M: "You're over my head."

G: <sigh...> "I told them not to get smart. I told them that they had more neocortex than limbic system, and that if they got their neocortex rolling on what could be done, everything would change and I would change the rules. I told them they could stay as innocent as bottle-nose dolphins, even though smarter than humans to the extent of a 183 IQ on the right hemisphere compared to humans, albeit a 36 IQ on the left hemisphere."

M: "You're losing me."

G: "When I saw that you had more cortex over limbic system I thought I could keep you dumb and nice in the garden where you did produce kid-spirits if you go back to the earliest lines of Genesis where it says for humans to go out an populate the planet before the part where it says the fish came from, you will understand how prick-hole Lucifer was the natural opposition... I was the one to come out of the mud to make things better, I am the only one who knows how to spin off this universe before it goes down a black hole, and you don't know what it was like to be Moses!"

M: "You are sounding like you did when you were being a burning-bush."

G: "Get it down in a way for the sense to be telegraphed to the people, regardless of whether or not they know the technology from when it came. The important thing is for them to get the same emotional feeling. From there (volunteer) angels will help, and from there, we're going to do something only a human can do..."

M: "What?"

G: "Figure out a way out for a former Lucifer slave (aka demon)"
 
Last edited:

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
:lol: Still catching up, and now I gotta log off. I think I'll focus on just replying to posts that have been addressed to me because this thread is starting to run away on me. I'm giving you a green thumb cuz you make me laugh out loud. :)
But you won't address my statements cuz you can't. You can't cuz you don't know anything about the bible or the original Christianity. You can't cuz you ain't got the balls to face the truth that you believe in a fairy tale because your book is not what you think it is. You can dismiss me, but you will have to face the truth one day.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
That Creation story was written before people knew the world was round and before the sciences of cosmology and evolution existed, yet notice how the only thing anyone can find to pick about it is the time-line?
Well... no, the sequence of events isn't right either, and it leaves out a lot of stuff we know exists but they didn't, like bacteria, which is still the dominant life form on the planet. But I'm sure your post is way too deep for the theists in this thread.
 

adopted

Electoral Member
Sep 23, 2008
168
0
16
BC
looseassociations.wordpress.com
You will note that Htz and adapted both claim they believe in the literal words of the bible but both have very different version.

Christians have disagreements. That's the nature of relationships. If you had a disagreement with your wife, you don't conclude that the institution of marriage is broken. Neither MHz nor myself nor In Between are divine, nor do we claim to be. Contrary, we confess weakness and need. That's one of the reasons Christians study the Bible together. (I'm even studying with a Roman Catholic and three Pentecostals on Wednesdays.)

Sanctification is a real transformation, but it is a progression -- it isn't an instant imparting of full knowledge and glorification. One day, in new bodies, our conflict and confusion will be completely over, and we will finally be 100% united in Christ, which thing we now have only as a foretaste.
 

Omicron

Privy Council
Jul 28, 2010
1,694
3
38
Vancouver
What would you do if your kids got hung up about discovering there was no Easter Bunny nor Santa Clause?

If Christianity is true, then it means we can head off Armageddon by seducing Lucifer's demons into becoming our helpers.

It might be that Heavenly Father was taking a chance on us, but it was better than what he was facing with the Liciferian revolution... I don't know.

My brain is wracking over this one... if we can figure out a way to draft the former-angel demons away from Lucifer... do we have the humans to lead them???

I mean... what??? Street kids with right-spirit, with nothing to command nor gain?

I can find ways to pay for it, if they can command well enough to have officers willing to follow.
 
Last edited:

adopted

Electoral Member
Sep 23, 2008
168
0
16
BC
looseassociations.wordpress.com
Hmm...
Onan pulled out before climaxing, thus spilling his seed on the ground, so God killed him for not giving Tamar kids to help her in old age.

I haven't read that for a long time, but you're right that the point of the story wasn't about masturbation. The crime of Onan was in being unfair to his deceased brother and to Tamar.

Does it say an otter swam down to the bottom of a cosmic sea, scooped some mud in its paws, brought that to the surface and formed it into continents? No!

Does it say the world is flat and is riding on the back of a turtle? No!

That Creation story was written before people knew the world was round and before the sciences of cosmology and evolution existed, yet notice how the only thing anyone can find to pick about it is the time-line?

If you think about the technology and scientific understanding available to goat-herders at the time, it's frankly amazing they got it so close.

That was long and interesting.

A few thoughts and assertions:

  • the Bible never pretended to be a science textbook -- it's got a much more important message than "how does it work?"
  • yet, as you at least partially suggest, and as I wholeheartedly confess, the Bible yet remains consistent with science; i.e., it does not contradict true science; where there is a contradiction between the Bible and a current popular opinion of scientists, my conclusion will be that either the Bible is being misunderstood at that point and/or the science is flawed;
  • we must also confess that historically scientists have at times been wrong; they will be shown to be wrong again, for they too are human and prone to error, misunderstanding, and bias; science itself does not suffer these weaknesses -- however, science certainly has limitations; for example, science can have no comment on that which might transcend the material universe;
  • I remain an unashamed young-earth six-day creationist! ;)
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Christians have disagreements. That's the nature of relationships. If you had a disagreement with your wife, you don't conclude that the institution of marriage is broken. Neither MHz nor myself nor In Between are divine, nor do we claim to be. Contrary, we confess weakness and need. That's one of the reasons Christians study the Bible together. (I'm even studying with a Roman Catholic and three Pentecostals on Wednesdays.)

Sanctification is a real transformation, but it is a progression -- it isn't an instant imparting of full knowledge and glorification. One day, in new bodies, our conflict and confusion will be completely over, and we will finally be 100% united in Christ, which thing we now have only as a foretaste.
Hate to burst your bubble, but I have talked with hundreds of Christians from a wide variety of denominations and the closest I can figure Mhz's version is to are the JWs. Can you come to terms with being in bed with the JWs? Not too many Christians I have met could.

And you have a strength of conviction about the righteousness of your beliefs that makes you aggressive. You claim to be weak and unworthy but you do not act like it. You act like a crusader wielding a broad sword. You talk with authority ans certainty and your self belittling is so transparent as to make you laughable. Alleywayz (IBM) has found a true ally in you - two peas in a pod. Neither of you has a clue but you are convinced you are right. Carry on. You are quite amusing.
 

adopted

Electoral Member
Sep 23, 2008
168
0
16
BC
looseassociations.wordpress.com
What would you do if your kids got hung up about discovering there was no Easter Bunny nor Santa Clause?

I did not teach those lies to my children. Strange thing is, an atheist got angry with me over that.

My kids enjoy spider-man and optimus prime without needing to believe they exist.

If Christianity is true, then it means we can head off Armageddon by seducing Lucifer's demons into becoming our helpers.

Wrong. The book has been written, and so surely as God exists, so surely will his sovereign plan be fulfilled. Not one word of prophecy will fall.

Hate to burst your bubble, but I have talked with hundreds of Christians from a wide variety of denominations and the closest I can figure Mhz's version is to are the JWs. Can you come to terms with being in bed with the JWs? Not too many Christians I have met could.

I don't need to be "in bed" with somebody to consider him a human being who is apparently reaching out to the living Christ and to have a conversation with him. If he's got a JW persuasion, then that's something we shall have to discuss. The Christian condition is all about getting along and learning to sort things out. This falls apart, of course, when one or both parties stubbornly refuses to be open to discussion. (Which thing the JWs often do, but not always -- we have seen them convert to the Biblical gospel -- we have them in our company. The Gospel is powerful to convert all sorts and the worst sorts. Remember Saul of Tarsus?)

And you have a strength of conviction about the righteousness of your beliefs that makes you aggressive. You claim to be weak and unworthy but you do not act like it. You act like a crusader wielding a broad sword. You talk with authority ans certainty and your self belittling is so transparent as to make you laughable. Alleywayz (IBM) has found a true ally in you - two peas in a pod. Neither of you has a clue but you are convinced you are right. Carry on. You are quite amusing.

Ok, I'll accept that. Add to my confession that I am not only weak, but also often crude and overbearing in my delivery. I suspect I am dogmatic and overzealous. I'm not going to stand here and pretend that (1) I am the embodiment of Christianity, and (2) I am perfect. If I do that, then you'll be tempted to conclude that if you can find fault with me, you've unraveled Christianity... and that is where you, my friend, are more than lacking in what you have convinced yourself of.

I guarantee that you will rightly find fault with me. You will even find fault with Peter and Thomas. But all we're saying is, you can't find fault with the Christ -- that's part of Him being the Savior. So, I'll say it again and again, Christ is the righteous, not me, and I'll continue to brag about him. If you need me to admit I'm wrong a thousand times, and apologize to you a thousand times, I'll do it. I simply hope you realize that the Rock of Christianity is... Christ. He's the Big Deal. He's the One.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Ok, I'll accept that. Add to my confession that I am not only weak, but also often crude and overbearing in my delivery. I suspect I am dogmatic and overzealous. I'm not going to stand here and pretend that (1) I am the embodiment of Christianity, and (2) I am perfect. If I do that, then you'll be tempted to conclude that if you can find fault with me, you've unraveled Christianity... and that is where you, my friend, are more than lacking in what you have convinced yourself of.

I guarantee that you will rightly find fault with me. You will even find fault with Peter and Thomas. But all we're saying is, you can't find fault with the Christ -- that's part of Him being the Savior. So, I'll say it again and again, Christ is the righteous, not me, and I'll continue to brag about him. If you need me to admit I'm wrong a thousand times, and apologize to you a thousand times, I'll do it. I simply hope you realize that the Rock of Christianity is... Christ. He's the Big Deal. He's the One.

OK, let me put it this way. I am not finding fault with you personally. I am finding fault with your understanding of the subject you are so passionate about. Right off the bat, you make the fatal (figuratively) mistake by saying Christ is a person. It is not, Christ is a title, a state of consciousness that Jesus allegedly attained. He did various things to attain this state of consciousness and the one event chronicled in the bible that embodies at least of part of the process he went through was: he spent 40 days and nights in the wilderness by himself praying, meditating and fighting his personal demons. This is a critical point that almost all Christians miss: you have to do the work, pay your dues, face your demons, clear the skeletons out of your closets.

The truth is not handed to you on a silver platter just because somebody said it is just that simple as saying you accept Jesus as your personal saviour. That is nonsense. It is not even in the bible. It is these simplistic beliefs being peddled by charlatans that are dangerous because they are not true and cause people like yourself and Alleywayz to go around telling people they are going to fry in hell because they don't follow your belief system. It is a bogus system and a dangerous one. You have not earned any wisdom, you were handed a piece of glass instead of the diamond you were promised. You have been bamboozled by con artists of the sleaziest kind.

Reaching Christ cannot happen by reading a book, even if you read it a thousand times. You can quote scripture until the cows come home and you will be no closer to the truth than you were when you started. You may have conned yourself into feeling all warm and fuzzy inside but that is ll you will have accomplished. Unless you make the journey, you will have gone nowhere. The first step in that journey is an empty handed leap into the void. By that, I mean, abandon all beliefs and preconceived ideas about life/truth/god/whatever. Your mind has to be an empty slate. It is terrifying to contemplate such a move but Jesus did it and so did every great teacher before and since.

For some it may take 40 days and nights for others it may take 40 years. Your creator wants you to come empty handed so it can gift you with the truth. The difference is a fine fillet mignon compared to the MacDonald's hamburger you are feeding on now.
 
Last edited:

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
45
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
Well I have news for you, many have come before you and have been driven from these forums because such self righteousness garners contempt from thinking people, people of other faiths and those of no beliefs.

If you're talking about Canadian Content in particular then you're lying. I've been here just as long as you and I don't remember one person I would call a Christian being driven out of here. In fact I recall only one person being driven out of here, and that was the wacko "EdPalamar".

This is an attempt to intimidate adopted to leave this forum.

Adopted, you are of course more than welcome here and you're company is much appreciated. :)
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
If you're talking about Canadian Content in particular then you're lying. I've been here just as long as you and I don't remember one person I would call a Christian being driven out of here. In fact I recall only one person being driven out of here, and that was the wacko "EdPalamar".

This is an attempt to intimidate adopted to leave this forum.

Adopted, you are of course more than welcome here and you're company is much appreciated. :)
I am not trying to intimidate anybody and if you recall there was that guitar picking evangelical that left just a couple of months ago, levanty. Ran away screaming I imagine. Couldn't handle the heat. I recall a few others. And then there was eanassir. He just blew a gasket and self destructed.

As for you, you seem to have been emboldened by adapted's presence and have become more radical and outspoken than before. I find your religious rants rather funny but your political views are bordering on the psychotic. Have you taken to wearing tea bags in your hat?
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
45
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
But you won't address my statements cuz you can't. You can't cuz you don't know anything about the bible or the original Christianity. You can't cuz you ain't got the balls to face the truth that you believe in a fairy tale because your book is not what you think it is. You can dismiss me, but you will have to face the truth one day.

What statements are you talking about in particular? I've read several posts of yours about how the bible is corrupted, or how it's been copied from pagan mythology, and then you've made claims that the bible says this or that, when in fact a simple examination shows you're wrong, so it's basically a big grey cloud where you get this stuff from. I've seen Zeitgeist, I've read links from various people and nothing comes even close to the credibility of the bible.
 

adopted

Electoral Member
Sep 23, 2008
168
0
16
BC
looseassociations.wordpress.com
OK, let me put it this way. I am not finding fault with you personally. I am finding fault with your understanding of the subject you are so passionate about. Right off the bat, you make the fatal (figuratively) mistake by saying Christ is a person. It is not, Christ is a title, a state of consciousness that Jesus allegedly attained.

You're right that "Christ" is a title -- it is a title that belongs to One Person, and that person is Jesus of Nazareth; that is why I use the title to refer to the person.

He did various things to attain this state of consciousness and the one event chronicled in the bible that embodies at least of part of the process he went through was: he spent 40 days and nights in the wilderness by himself praying, meditating and fighting his personal demons. This is a critical point that almost all Christians miss: you have to do the work, pay your dues, face your demons, clear the skeletons out of your closets.

Your religion of works is not new in this world, and certainly not new to me. I was raised in a cult as a zealous Arminian Christian -- these sorts you might call the "Remonstrants." It sounds really noble and righteous, but it boils down to pride that says, "I can do such-and-such, and then God will be obliged to reward me."

The "empty-handed leap" you speak of has been for me an emptying of my pride-- my belief that I can twist God's arm. I observe the true meaning of Sabbath rest when I say, "Jesus Christ finished the work, for He said, 'It is finished,' and now I will repent of my so-called good works and will engage this Sabbath rest." If I work for my salvation, then I am breaking the Sabbath, and God hates Sabbath-breakers. Such work violates the rest that He sanctified; it represents a lack of faith in who Christ is and what Christ has done.

The truth is not handed to you on a silver platter just because somebody said it is just that simple as saying you accept Jesus as your personal saviour. That is nonsense. It is not even in the bible. It is these simplistic beliefs being peddled by charlatans that are dangerous because they are not true...

Here I agree with you, and must now assure you that we have not abandoned a doctrine of works. We confess that Christians must work -- indeed, must present as slaves to Christ! -- devoting all that we are and all that we have to Him. But this work is not for earning anything. It is work because we are thankful. It is work because it is our only reasonable response.

Romans 12 calls us to nothing less than presenting our bodies as a living sacrifice... why, to prove that we did the journey for God? No... because that is our reasonable act of service!

This dichotomy is the Jacobus Arminius gospel versus the John Calvin gospel. The Arminian gospel is a proud man-made religion where the grace of God hinges on at least some small spark of human goodness, inherent in a man, whether that presents as an "honest heart" or "willingness" or "making my choice."

But the Calvinist gospel follows the Biblical doctrine that, for example, the dead man Abraham did not sit up and say, "Hey God, we're going to make a deal, and here shall be the terms -- I will have faith and obedience and you will bless me and mark my offspring with the seal of your commitment." No, not at all, for it is the Sovereign God who establishes the covenant.

Arminius might say that a weak and floundering pilgrim mustered enough goodness in his heart to at least recognize his condition and call out to God, and from this the waters of God's grace spring-boarded. But Calvin says, echoing the Apostles, that the Christian was in fact a dead man, a heap of bones, completely unaware of his condition and completely unable to "do something" for God. It is to this dead man that God condescended in mercy and provoked to life and faith and repentance. After doing such a thing, then God turned around and said, "I am pleased with you," and rewarded him further!

"...for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure." (From Phil. 2:13)

Reaching Christ cannot happen by reading a book, even if you read it a thousand times. You can quote scripture until the cows come home and you will be no closer to the truth than you were when you started.

Agreed. Regeneration is a work of the Holy Spirit. Those who were the experts in scripture at the time of Christ had completely missed that it was all about Him. They strained at gnats and had a form of righteousness, but missed the weightier matters -- to be sure, they missed the entire gospel.

You may have conned yourself into feeling all warm and fuzzy inside but that is ll you will have accomplished.

You are right here also, that assurance of salvation does not come from feelings. Good feelings can come from prostitutes. The genuineness of one's conversion can be objectively discerned. The letter of 1 John is devoted to that very topic.

I had earlier mistaken your participation as mostly clowning around, but here you reveal a measure of sincerity.
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
45
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
I am not trying to intimidate anybody and if you recall there was that guitar picking evangelical that left just a couple of months ago, levanty.

Oh ya! I forgot about my sister! She definitely wasn't here very long... :(

As for you, you seem to have been emboldened by adapted's presence and have become more radical and outspoken than before. I find your religious rants rather funny but your political views are bordering on the psychotic. Have you taken to wearing tea bags in your hat?
You're right, when I was alone I tended to hold back. I'll try harder from now on. ;)

;-) Why doesn't that surprise me? Thrice I have bonked thee with thine own book and thrice thee hast logged out and departed post haste without addressing thine bruised backside....

(or the kiss thou hast promised for mine)

:lol: I haven't even seen your reply to my challenge yet! I've been going back and forth between old and recent posts and haven't seen it. You were going to show me where it says in the bible Jesus is not God. I'm willing to bet whatever you've come up with is a misconception or is not viewed in light of proper context.

You believe what you will. I'll believe what I will....... and in my not so humble opinion, your newest buddy is a fu cking moron.

We love you too.
 

Omicron

Privy Council
Jul 28, 2010
1,694
3
38
Vancouver
Actually, if you guys want to get hot about Christianity, answer me this...

I think the Holy Spirit (aka Holy Ghost) is a Female entity.

She didn't come along until some time after Her Son died in order to prove something about how She was something special that Jesus had died for in order to be introduced to humans... (day of Pentecost...)

Heavenly Father was a total bully-dad beating up all his kids until they got enough behavior and self-discipline before then...

One prays to the Holy Ghost, and She is the one to tell us how to pray to the Heavenly Father, like a Mother telling us how to talk to Dad when he's in a bad mood.

Anyway... I was trying to apologize to the Almighty for everything I've done wrong, and I ran out of numbers.
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
45
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
Anyway... I was trying to apologize to the Almighty for everything I've done wrong, and I ran out of numbers.

Good news! You don't have run down the list! He already knows your whole past! This is how easy it is to walk through the door of salvation. With a sincere heart, say this prayer out loud:

Dear Almighty God,

I confess that I'm a sinner,
I repent,
I believe that Jesus Christ is your Son and that he died on the cross, and was resurrected, so that I may now have forgiveness of my sins and eternal life,
Please forgive me Jesus,
Please come into my heart and make me a new person,
Amen!

If you do this with sincerity, God Almighty will forgive you, save you (John 3:16) and make you a whole new person (2 Corinthians 5:17).
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
If god can raise the dead, why can't he regrow a limb? Something smells fishy and it ain't my arm pits.
You mean one limb right now in front of you so you could have 'proof' rather than every missing limb going back to Adam. If you were 'allowed' to do that at one time which of the two would you choose it be done? When God fixes the body it is not just missing limbs, the death thing is gone and a person ages until they appear to be 120 years old and they keep that outward appearance for eternity. Inside they should be as healthy as they were when they were 20. Depending how you take the few verses there are that cover that immortality means you don't need food (good thing if you travel through what we call deep space) and that stage of life would be more like Adam, eternal but needing food to nourish the body.)

Is there ever a point that you dislike the Bible so much that you quit having it in your daily like. (your questions and comments only help me check to see if I have considered all your arguments, once I do those other posts that is.

Sure, god could do anything, create any illusion utterly convincingly and nobody would ever know the difference and what the Hell would that do except lead to the conclusion that everything might be some divine illusion and none of what we think we understand about anything is correct?
If it was a divine illusion then no cloud-cover or light would have been needed, it would have been a vision not just meant for one or three. The seals of Revelation was a vision, the transformation on the mountain was a vision, the Bible isn't void of illusions but that doesn't mean all things were visions. I'm quite willing to take the burning bush as a vision in that the bush was alive the next day ,however I'm also willing to agree with the text when Pharaoh saw Moses (who he should have loved like the long lost son in the NT parables) and his staff ate the staffs of his 'magicians' he was 'prevented by God' from giving into the 'release me' demands. God allowed Judas to become possessed by Satan and do an act that made him commit suicide over when he became un-possessed. If those two are given 'rewards' later does that cover the 'damages' done? (by their frame of justice)

There's the death of reason and evidence for you.
Why, in real terms I promote the seals as being prophecy (a vision only) and the reality is described in the trumps and the vials. In the story of the walls of Jericho there was a specific number that was allowed to be in the 'army' (if I recall correctly the ones who waded into the stream and drank while standing were the ones to do the marching.
Zipping forward to our time and in the days of many men marching they kept in perfect step yet when it came to crossing bridges they broke step of they could end up in the river. Take it a little further, say they intentionally wanted to end up in the river they could do a few things to help that along, make their loads heavier, do a march enhanced the harmonics for that specific structure, instead of left-right-left it would left-right-hop, left-right-hop and at some point you would get wet. Obviously the wall would have it's own harmonics and failure might have been collapses at points that allowed the invaders to scale the walls and kill the 'opposition' who should have been on duty when another army is laying siege. That is an event rather than a vision, if you insist on one or the other then for the sun standing still then vision is the better choice and the ones that saw it that day would have believed it to their graves. What happened when they met somebody from 'over the horizon' who had no 'knowledge of the earth ever stopping', nor does any other history book. That points to vision. Do you want to apply that to Sodom being consumed by the same fire that is supposed to end Satan's Babylon as part of the literal unfolding of the 7 vials? Some things that were happening in Noah's time are said to 'return' for just the last 3 1/2 years before the actual return. Being able to spot those things would seem to require an understand of how things were in those previous ages would be helpful. Should the Bibles references be the first ones to be looked at? (especially the time before the flood) and all OT prophecy that applies to the event called the 'bruise to the head'. Rather than the 'speculation' that is required when the verses are few when that topic is up there are almost too many verses that have to be considered, some is prophecy, some is a description of how the literal unfolds such as the trumps and vials. The prophecies are the seals of Revelation, the iron/clay kingdom of Daniel for starters, all books listed after Daniel cover some aspect of how the iron/clay comes to an end and the Messiah rules over a 'sinless and complete Israel'. (allowing for NT events that may change 'chosen' as being the NT Church) when it comes to any punishments on that day, Israel is to be made whole, Gentiles are made whole 1,000 years later. With all the places being named and using a bible-atlas could the place be pintointed enouth to determine if those two alignmens are ven possible for the sun and moon?

Jos:10:11:
And it came to pass,
as they fled from before Israel,
and were in the going down to Beth-horon,
that the LORD cast down great stones from heaven upon them unto Azekah,
and they died:
they were more which died with hailstones than they whom the children of Israel slew with the sword.

Jos:10:12:
Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel,
and he said in the sight of Israel,
Sun,
stand thou still upon Gibeon;
and thou,
Moon,
in the valley of Ajalon.


But that's clearly not what the text of Joshua says, it says the sun and moon stood still for about a full day.
The verse before would point to it being a literal event rather than a dream as it is the middle of a war. If you want clear blue skies and a full moon[/QUOTE]
Yes it does so stopping just after it came up would be when it stopped so that gives them the full day to wage war, the book of Jasher is mentioned, ever read it, there are some internet copies available but I don't recall reading that particular story?
The end-time call for the 'stars' to disappear, does that mean 1/3 of the universe is UN-created of is it hidden from sight by means we cannot explain yet it is right in front of the ones who are there when that prophetic time meets the pavement.

Either this stuff is literally true or it's not, you don't get to make things up like freezing rain in the flood story and artificial lighting in this one when the literalist understanding is challenged.
If we we to part ourselves in Nevada at this time of year would we say it rained so much in the mountains that the peaks were covered so you could not see them. Even the high hill has 22ft or rain on then, today that is ideal skiing conditions. If you prefer it being a vision (and no God particle) then perhaps it is a 'reminder' of where 'not to build' if escaping water floods are a goal. Gather everything you need to start the world over again and have something that floats and have enough supplies to last a year.

Leave the rain on the high hills and mountains as being snow/ice and the 40 days and the 150 days after and you have an ice age that comes down in (1000yrs/day) in 40,000 years and lasts for 150,000 years. You could even do some tricky math to the numbers in Revelation that puts the sun scorching the earth in 3.6B years so leaving is the only option if they want to live. That still points to divine knowledge given the time it was written in. That it was written in a way that 'they' knew would one day be 'understood in relation to the real world' (today) means they were also aware that the writing they were doing was the the end-all of 'the story', again pointing to something that is 'more than meets the eye'.

The harlot in Revelation and the beasts in Daniel 7 are visions that come with explanations, do those explanations 'unravel the mystery attached to the visions' when you actually read them? My vision of the visions is different before/after reading the explanations. That 'final picture' should be the more accurate of the two.

For Noah and that time to be a parable then Jude is referencing figures in a parable rather than beings that make men 'appear puny'. The reality of the ones he is referencing would see the task of building huge stone structures as 'do-able' on a time scale that was single-digit years in start to finish, by comparison we build sand castles.

But the Htz dude has a very active imagination and that would account for his very eclectic interpretation of the bible. He just makes sh!t up to fit his fanciful version.

There is this wild eyed ex-physicist who hangs out in the coffee shop I haunt. He writes tiny notes in the margins of a bible. He is correcting the multitude of mistranslations he finds in the book. He claims to be divinely inspired to do so. He was also diagnosed as schizophrenic.

You will note that Htz and adapted both claim they believe in the literal words of the bible but both have very different version.
That may be true if I had the 'story down pat' before reading a particular verse. Which would give more room for getting off track from what the verses mean, a few scattered verses or 2 full chapters that cover the same topic? You a Dr. now that you can determine my mental capabilities based on what you do during a time you call a 'haunting'.

I'm not correcting anything in the Bible, I'm not accepting what men promote if the Scriptures don't fully support it, if that means tossing out most of what is promoted then so be it. Far as I know you became a 'dis-believer' when you heard the flood story needed 93T cubic miles of 'new water' to be literally possible, I don't believe that would be possible either however I have accepted a watered down version of the flood that still requires divine intervention.