Romney Calls for a Century of American Dominance
Romney's belligerent foreign policy speech struggled to suggest a difference between Bush, Obama, and himself
by John Glaser, October 07, 2011
| Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum
Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney made his first major foreign policy speech Friday at The Citadel, a military college in the important primary state of South Carolina. Full of pomp and belligerence, he called for a century of American dominance.
“This century must be an American century. In an American century, America has the strongest economy and the strongest military in the world,” Romney said. “God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will.”
Romney Calls for a Century of American Dominance -- News from Antiwar.com
........How would that be different from what exists now??? That does NOT make him any different from any of the ones he wants to differentiate from. US dominance is not even a party issue. It is an american issue.that is executed by whatever party is in power.
Romney's belligerent foreign policy speech struggled to suggest a difference between Bush, Obama, and himself
by John Glaser, October 07, 2011
| Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum
Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney made his first major foreign policy speech Friday at The Citadel, a military college in the important primary state of South Carolina. Full of pomp and belligerence, he called for a century of American dominance.
“This century must be an American century. In an American century, America has the strongest economy and the strongest military in the world,” Romney said. “God did not create this country to be a nation of followers. America is not destined to be one of several equally balanced global powers. America must lead the world, or someone else will.”
Romney Calls for a Century of American Dominance -- News from Antiwar.com
........How would that be different from what exists now??? That does NOT make him any different from any of the ones he wants to differentiate from. US dominance is not even a party issue. It is an american issue.that is executed by whatever party is in power.