Indiana Republican NOT gay

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Ok then, maybe you're bi-curious; who cares...you're still a creepy lying Fail Poster Boy.


State Rep. Phil Hinkle admitted Tuesday that he paid a young man $80 to have a good time. But Hinkle insisted he isn't gay and doesn't know why he did it.


He said that he understood why he's being stripped of his committee chairmanships and that he won't seek re-election. But he said he will not resign, despite House Speaker Brian Bosma's call Tuesday to do so.


And he said he did nothing illegal with -- or to -- the young man and that he himself was the victim of a crime. But he said he would not file a police report. (Thank god for that)



Hinkle offered his first public comments Tuesday since The Indianapolis Star revealed that the lawmaker used Craigslist to arrange to pay a young man to spend time with him Aug. 6 at a Downtown hotel.


But if Hinkle's comments seemed at times short of full disclosure or even contradictory, that's far from where the contradiction ends.
Hinkle's version of what happened that night in Room 2610 at the JW Marriott hotel differs greatly from the version provided by the young man and his sister.


Kameryn Gibson, the 18-year-old who said he was looking for a "sugga daddy" in the Craigslist posting, told The Star that he tried to leave the room that night and called his sister Megan after Hinkle identified himself as a lawmaker. He also said Hinkle tried to keep him from leaving, exposed himself and then -- after his sister arrived -- offered them $100 cash, an iPad and a Blackberry to keep quiet.




more...


http://www.indystar.com/article/20110824/LOCAL1804/108240311/Rep-Hinkle-paid-young-man-80-encounter-hotel?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|IndyStar.com
 

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,390
1,065
113
lol Gotta love Locutus - always rummaging around in the bottom of the barrel.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
lol Gotta love Locutus - always rummaging around in the bottom of the barrel.

This is harmless flotsam. Gritty bits that most never see. Consider yourselves blessed.


Most are IV-fed the disinfected soup presented by MSM and their ilk.

But if you think this is the 'bottom' you ain't never been on /b/.

 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Tickle fights do not constitute being gay. At least that's what I heard.

Don't condone tickle fights much myself.


Anyone remember a 'sword fight' with glow-in-the-dark condoms in some movie (Nightshift or Nightmoves or night-something?) with John Ritter and the Fonz. Quite amusing it was.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I can believe that he's possibly not gay.

Lust



When it comes to politicians it does. Every aspect of their lives matter, and it should be scrutinized.

That would only apply if you CARE about a politician's sexuality.

I don't.

I care about their integrity and honesty, but not orientation. It's not part of the job description.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Anyone remember a 'sword fight' with glow-in-the-dark condoms in some movie (Nightshift or Nightmoves or night-something?) with John Ritter and the Fonz. Quite amusing it was.
I remember the scene but not the name of the movie. I think it was the only scene in the movie worth remembering.

So you don't scrutinize all the candidates before you decide who you support? Of course you do.
I bet you wouldn't vote for a gay, Muslim abortionist.
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
45
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
That would only apply if you CARE about a politician's sexuality.

I don't.

I care about their integrity and honesty, but not orientation. It's not part of the job description.

Well, I do. I care about every single aspect of their lives. Their sexuality is only a small part.

I bet you wouldn't vote for a gay, Muslim abortionist.

Never. Just like you wouldn't vote for a pro-life, evangelical Christian.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Well, I do. I care about every single aspect of their lives. Their sexuality is only a small part.



Never. Just like you wouldn't vote for a pro-life, evangelical Christian.
Well, I might. I voted for the NDP because of Jack, and he was supposedly Catholic, and everybody knows there is no love lost between me and the RC church. I evaluate the integrity of the person, not their religious affiliations or sexual orientation. I am actually anti-abortion because I believe all life is sacred but I also believe it is none of my business what other people do with their bodies. That is between them and their god.
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
45
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
Well, I might. I voted for the NDP because of Jack, and he was supposedly Catholic, and everybody knows there is no love lost between me and the RC church.

According to Wikipedia he was part of the United Church, which is protestant.

I evaluate the integrity of the person, not their religious affiliations or sexual orientation.

I prefer to evaluate everything.

I am actually anti-abortion because I believe all life is sacred

Good for you. :thumbup:

but I also believe it is none of my business what other people do with their bodies. That is between them and their god.

Well, when it comes to abortion the baby is NOT the woman's body, it belongs to the child. When it comes to sexual orientation, you're right, it's between them and God. But that doesn't mean one can't evaluate it when deciding who you want to lead the nation.