So let me get this straight. A fully developed "fetus" one second before birth, is not a person/human?
Jilted ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard that sparks free speech, privacy court
- Thread starter Praxius
- Start date
So let me get this straight. A fully developed "fetus" one second before birth, is not a person/human?
Sounds to me like he's more into being a control freak, based on what he has posted on Twitter under the handle of: "prdpgn"
"What do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Nothing. She's already been told twice."
"What does a battered woman do when she comes home from the hospital? The dishes, if she knows what's good for her."
"What do you do if you see your ex running around in your front yard covered in blood and screaming for help? Stay calm, reload, & try again."
"It's not that I regret meeting you, it's that I regret not running you over with my car before you walked out on me."
Hurt indeed.... I can picture him now in his wife beater shirt drinking moonshine in the trailer park..... the sad thing is most of those are so dated, they're not even funny
Abortion Billboard Man Greg Fultz's Violent Twitter History
Abortion Billboard Man Greg Fultz's Violent... | Gather
Also from other sources I have come across, she was 18 at the time of the pregnancy and she asked him to marry her..... he said no.
Sorry to say, but my sympathy for this clown is very limited.
*sigh* - Yes, that is correct..... go look it up, cuz I'm not going to explain it again for the 73'rd time in yet another thread about abortion. Once you are born and take your first breath, your classification changes to being a person.
Equate yourself to a chicken all you like. Based on your posts, one must come to the inevitable conclusion, that you are right, at least as far as brains concerned.
Meantime, go and support the killing of human babies. Figures!
And how convenient is that argument for someone who supports abortion?
Close my eyes and kill - because its not really a human after all...
From what I understand, the young man in question wouldn't marry the girl in question. In which case I'd say he abandoned his rights to have any moral high ground.
Oh, goodie, back to tossing personal insults because you don't have an argument.... yet again.
How typical of you.
I'd rather equate myself to a functioning, living chicken then how some in here want to equate themselves to a two-celled organism or a fetus with a brain that hasen't even fully developed, and thus they should have the same rights..... at least my equating was towards something that was actually born and has a functioning brain, which says a lot about you.
They're not babies..... you did at least go take sex-ed or biology while in school, didn't you?
You did go to school, right??
If you didn't then that would explain a lot. :roll:
Oh, I'm sorry that the world doesn't agree with you, nor do our human rights, biology, or our nation's laws...... I can't help that Facts actually support my side of the argument and are convenient for me and others who hold the same view.
Sore loser much?
Why would anybody have to close their eyes?
As mentioned a thousand times before, it's a Human Fetus or a Human Zygote..... it is not a Human Being.
A zygote has its own DNA which it gets from its mother's DNA and father's DNA at conception. (source)
It - is - a - being.
Opinions don't determine what is right and wrong, and laws can be unjust. Surely you can think of at least one law you find to be unfair and illogical!
You're ignoring the human right to life that an unborn person has. The argument that a unborn fetus isn't really a human and therefore has no right to life is the biggest injustice to human rights today.
Further, you foolishly drank from the cup of moral relativism. Therefore you must adhere to the argument that a woman only has the RELATIVE right to abort a pregnancy. Unless at this time you wish to contradict your beliefs and claim that a woman has an ABSOLUTE right to abort a pregnancy.
You're ignoring the biology. A fetus has its own DNA, sex, and blood type. And as I've already proved, the earliest stage of an embryo, has it's own DNA right from the beginning of conception.
You accuse others of not knowing science when you certainly haven't faced or have ignored the facts yourself!!!
What I meant to say was close their minds. Pro life doesn't conform to your moral relativism/left-wing philosophy/atheism so it must be ruled invalid. How can you possibly be an atheist and a pro-lifer at the same time?! Pro-lifers are silly evangelical Christians right?! Cognitive Dissonance.
Typical tactic. Resorting to personal attacks because you can't satisfactorily defend your nonsense.
Last edited:
This is the first abortion thread I've seen here, so I wouldn't know that you've previously enlightened the forum on this. Since you're so tired of doing so over and over again, I won't ask you to explain this to me, but since you're suggesting we look it up, maybe you could point me in the right direction. Thanks in advance.
When chickens with MD degree crack open half-hatched eggs to kill their young, your half-basked argument will carry some light weight.
Until then find a better analogy.
There's nothing wrong with abortion. The anti movement is slowly dying off and even Harper will not resurrect the issue.
What's wrong is when you can't have a respectful conversation as a couple to properly decide whether abortion is the right option for you.
What's wrong is when you can't have a respectful conversation as a couple to properly decide whether abortion is the right option for you.
So, according to you, there is nothing wrong killing babies who can't recite the aplhabet and can't count past ten. According to you and people like you, extinguishing a human life is just a matter of weeks, or days.
Question for you and your cohorts: Have you ever had the joy and pleasure of holding a brand new baby in your arms?
Never mind, you did not, could not have and never would. For the likes of you personal convenience and comfort trumps all. All in the name of freedom, of course.
All human sperm, human egg, human zygote, human fetus, human baby to human cadaver.
Killing humans ain't cool.
Coming to a vagina near me in November 2011.
We just had a conversation yesterday on possible abortion after next week's ultrasound. She was worried that if there was a serious deficiency, whether we should abort. I said, it would have to depend on the type of disability and the possible outcome for the child while also keeping in mind she'll be five months in and what harm an abortion this late could cause.
Otherwise, we could put the child up for adoption. She was worried that it would be 'irresponsible' to put it up for adoption. I said, that it would be more responsible to put the child in the hands of a better set of parents if we really think we can't handle one with a serious disability.
A nice set options were set on the table. Reason miraculously sprung from both of our respective conceptual frameworks and a consensus will be reached!
All this productive dialogue between thinking minds, while dip****s like you would force us to give up our liberties completely and live like prisoners to a primitive etiquette that will soon be extinguished.
Last edited: