Harper asked to drop "1967" by Israel at G8
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
We have a Transparent Government remember? When somebody asks a serious question they can just turn invisible.
We must ALLl stand for Isreal and against the pre-1967 border B.S. There was a reason why Isreal took over that portion of land - they were attacked!! It's bad enough that all their neighbours want them dead but for them to agree to the pre-67 border would be suicide as it would be undefensible. How could anyone possibly ask a country to stop defending themselves so that others can kill them all. LISTEN TO THE WORDS OF HAMAS AND HISBOLLA (sp) et al. They mean every word they say and the World needs to listen. If Isreal falls, so does the West, of that I am convinced.
Let me ask those of you who support the pre-1967 border issue. Do you REALLY think that if Isreal went back to those borders that anything would change? Yeah! It would but not for the better!
JMO
Let me ask those of you who support the pre-1967 border issue. Do you REALLY think that if Isreal went back to those borders that anything would change? Yeah! It would but not for the better!
JMO
I would qualify for one of those critters, the place I want them taken back are to the deals that were first made (by Britain) which would be independence for the ones living there if Britain won WW1. End of story. The next deal Britain made was with Lord Rothschild for the creation of a homeland for the Jews where they (what as this was before the events of WWII so it was a place to be safe from persecution and exile)
Lets define what a Jew is, is that a Political or Commercial or Religious group? If it is Political then you cannot use the Military agains Civilians and still keep what you 'capture', that covers the 600,000 Arabs that got exiled after Israel was recognized by the UN in May of 1948. The 70,000 before that would come under the protection of the UN 181.
Let's take it that far back to see if that would make a difference. For starters Gaza would have a longer border along the coast and that would also mean she own what is 'out there' as far as gas and oil and fish goes. All the land was to be purchased, using UN47 borders would cost less than Nov48 borders and Jan68 borders would cost the most just using area. There was no uninhabitated land in any of those years, when you 'buy a place' you get the whole square, a farmer might not want trees but if they are on the property they were part of the purchase. If a Village of 1,000 people were the only ones in an area of 1,000 sq mi the each person should have been paid the same price and 'the Jews' would now be the title holders of the 1,000 sq mi. Leaving the village standing with a bunch of new millionaires would not have hurt the economy. Getting paid would take some of the 'sting away' so that when it came to the Government taking sides they would be biting themselves. That is how it it should have been in 48, piles of money for the Arabs and the right to return means they would form a majority Government. Control of the Golan Heights would be counterproductive unless you plan on attacking your own friends. If security was a concern the people could always be paid money to 'be your friend', lots of money that made the lowest income jump from $2/day to $200/day (Rothschild Credits in keeping with the pure fantasy aspect) would have them doing other things than 'plotting terrorist activities'. Like some nicely terraced fields that pop food production up 23.5% annually.
The current path is towards the original map desired by the Rothschild Bankers before 1900, a Jewish homeland with no Gaza and no West Bank period. That route pretty much says the only rule that needs to be followed is there are no rules when it comes to getting what you want.
When did we ever publicly support that as the way for a Nation to do business? (other that at the UN, .... and NATO, .... and NAFTA etc.)
When only one party does the talking and the other only listens it is not 'technically' a 'discussion' as that would entail both sides having 'input'. Did Harper have any public statements about the border before the meeting? It's liartalk, Bill Clinton used it in the 'din not have sexual relations' 'confession'. How often do you get a reply to a post ready and then run it past a Lawyer before hitting the 'post' button?
Lets define what a Jew is, is that a Political or Commercial or Religious group? If it is Political then you cannot use the Military agains Civilians and still keep what you 'capture', that covers the 600,000 Arabs that got exiled after Israel was recognized by the UN in May of 1948. The 70,000 before that would come under the protection of the UN 181.
Let's take it that far back to see if that would make a difference. For starters Gaza would have a longer border along the coast and that would also mean she own what is 'out there' as far as gas and oil and fish goes. All the land was to be purchased, using UN47 borders would cost less than Nov48 borders and Jan68 borders would cost the most just using area. There was no uninhabitated land in any of those years, when you 'buy a place' you get the whole square, a farmer might not want trees but if they are on the property they were part of the purchase. If a Village of 1,000 people were the only ones in an area of 1,000 sq mi the each person should have been paid the same price and 'the Jews' would now be the title holders of the 1,000 sq mi. Leaving the village standing with a bunch of new millionaires would not have hurt the economy. Getting paid would take some of the 'sting away' so that when it came to the Government taking sides they would be biting themselves. That is how it it should have been in 48, piles of money for the Arabs and the right to return means they would form a majority Government. Control of the Golan Heights would be counterproductive unless you plan on attacking your own friends. If security was a concern the people could always be paid money to 'be your friend', lots of money that made the lowest income jump from $2/day to $200/day (Rothschild Credits in keeping with the pure fantasy aspect) would have them doing other things than 'plotting terrorist activities'. Like some nicely terraced fields that pop food production up 23.5% annually.
The current path is towards the original map desired by the Rothschild Bankers before 1900, a Jewish homeland with no Gaza and no West Bank period. That route pretty much says the only rule that needs to be followed is there are no rules when it comes to getting what you want.
When did we ever publicly support that as the way for a Nation to do business? (other that at the UN, .... and NATO, .... and NAFTA etc.)
Harper, Netanyahu did not discuss G8 statement, officials say
When only one party does the talking and the other only listens it is not 'technically' a 'discussion' as that would entail both sides having 'input'. Did Harper have any public statements about the border before the meeting? It's liartalk, Bill Clinton used it in the 'din not have sexual relations' 'confession'. How often do you get a reply to a post ready and then run it past a Lawyer before hitting the 'post' button?
So If Israel falls North America and Europe will be invaded and fall too??? :roll:
Ladies and gentlemen the real Prime Minister of Canada Benjamin Netanyahu zionist crime boss. Our man Harper is not our man at all, he's their man and my children and yours already die for the zionist pigs. Palestine one state solution, screw the Israeli pigs.
Who would have thought, Iceland alone will emerge the winner, OMG who saw that coming?
I hope we hang out out 'Epic FAIL' sign before we take out troops out of Afghanistan and put the on our new 'ward nation, Libya'. Ofter all $130 in bombs is just the down-payment. At least we know it won't be anytime before the next 90 days as we have 'free reign' until then. Gaddafi can also rest easy as his death would mean the $war$ would stop early, about day 85 he may want to start taking precautions.
I hope we hang out out 'Epic FAIL' sign before we take out troops out of Afghanistan and put the on our new 'ward nation, Libya'. Ofter all $130 in bombs is just the down-payment. At least we know it won't be anytime before the next 90 days as we have 'free reign' until then. Gaddafi can also rest easy as his death would mean the $war$ would stop early, about day 85 he may want to start taking precautions.
Last edited:
Lybia will be democratized to rubble following the sucessfull Iraq rescue of the down trodden. Democrazy on the wings of efficient hi tech carnage delivered by the gutless braindead western taxslave. all present and accounted for sir