Canadian 9/11 Petition for Parliament
- Thread starter darkbeaver
- Start date
I think if people on this forum really want answers then the first step is to support the petition and vote for candidates that will do the same.
Canadians Vote for 911 Truth Candidates in the Federal Election | Facebook
Canadians Vote for 911 Truth Candidates in the Federal Election | Facebook
I really want answers. To questions that have been posed to the nutters, that they never answer.
Other than that, the only other questions I have for the authorities is, who knew what when.
Everything else is well explained.
This guy actually does what science is supposed to do. Try to replicate and repeat.
YouTube - 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
YouTube - 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
It is my planet dump denizen. Everyone here knows Israel did 9/11. You're the oddball religious nut bag in waiting Bear. Don't go down with the bad ship Israel. Get off the boat with the intelligent. Do it man, you can fake it.
The benefit of a Canadian investigation is that the public in general would get facts from more credible sources in a
formal process. It would help with ending a lot of the debate.
formal process. It would help with ending a lot of the debate.
Neat vid petros, lets examine some facts.
1, The thermite found in the dust, was a hoax, to foll nutters.
2, All the contraptions he made, would have left a trail even Mr. Magoo could have followed.
It was interesting though. Thanx.
Interesting name for you planet. Seems fitting for a rodent.
No it wouldn't.
A hoax to foil nutters? Come on man you can do better than that. I know you can and you know you can.
Who was looking for contraptions? Mr Magoo and a team of researchers from his alma mater Rutgers?
He proved it could be done where Nat Geo and the other "debunkers" failed epically.
Ah well, it's just YouTube science and nothing was proven.
YouTube - Defusing Nanothermite: Integrity
And I already posted the great big gotchya to Mhz, in one of the other threads on 9/11, from the scientists that perpetrated it.
If anyone truly wants to find a sample, they should suit up in neoprene and go for a dip in the East River. Do you have your PADI?
As for the experimentation. I'd love to see someone prove him wrong. Can you? Nat Geo, NIST and Myth Busters can't. He debunked the debunkers very nicely and without anything ludicris.
As for the experimentation. I'd love to see someone prove him wrong. Can you? Nat Geo, NIST and Myth Busters can't. He debunked the debunkers very nicely and without anything ludicris.
He is a person I can't remember seeing before. I can't recall any rebuttal to him on any other threads here or ant thread, anybody else see him (Swedish guy) before? A link would be nice.
YouTube - Nano-thermite took down the WTC?
Some welder might want t assemble a boxcolumn the proper size, with bracing, and set a wood fire blazing (with a wind if you like) and then try to bend it even using a press. No way, the crossbracing was H-Beams and if the top cavity was filled with the right sized particles it could be ignited so heat transfer was at a max for as long as possible before that cross-brace would fail, that will give you enough heat that the box would 'sag' combine that sag with a tug on the floorjoists that are cool and with the cement still in place they could bow the outer columns inward, on all 4 sides rather than just the impacted side as the crash was enough to sway the building so a slight bow on that side could be impact damage that didn't spring back.
As a kid we could get the chems from the pharmacy to build crude 'gun powder' 3 simple products and the mixture would melt glass from inside the bottle. No explosion but one hell of a lot of heat. "salt peter' was the main component. Several H-beams filled level with that would wick a lot of heat into the box-columns. In the pic below the very highest part together is the bracing web, make that red hot and there goes the support fore the strongest part of the building. Jet fuel either started the burn or it started the ignition. The stuff we made was ignited by pushing a wooden match in while it was still burning its start-up chems. We never did try to put it out.
YouTube - Nano-thermite took down the WTC?
Suddenly all diving permits "DENIED", good answer though.
Some welder might want t assemble a boxcolumn the proper size, with bracing, and set a wood fire blazing (with a wind if you like) and then try to bend it even using a press. No way, the crossbracing was H-Beams and if the top cavity was filled with the right sized particles it could be ignited so heat transfer was at a max for as long as possible before that cross-brace would fail, that will give you enough heat that the box would 'sag' combine that sag with a tug on the floorjoists that are cool and with the cement still in place they could bow the outer columns inward, on all 4 sides rather than just the impacted side as the crash was enough to sway the building so a slight bow on that side could be impact damage that didn't spring back.
As a kid we could get the chems from the pharmacy to build crude 'gun powder' 3 simple products and the mixture would melt glass from inside the bottle. No explosion but one hell of a lot of heat. "salt peter' was the main component. Several H-beams filled level with that would wick a lot of heat into the box-columns. In the pic below the very highest part together is the bracing web, make that red hot and there goes the support fore the strongest part of the building. Jet fuel either started the burn or it started the ignition. The stuff we made was ignited by pushing a wooden match in while it was still burning its start-up chems. We never did try to put it out.
Last edited:
Keep trying what? He managed to cut some beams in his back yard. I managed to bend an H beam with a few tons of pressure, in a press, with less then 2000 degrees of heat.
All the crap you'd need to do what he claims, would take years to install, and so many man hours, that you'd need a small army.
Yet we hear nothing from any of them, and since it would have had to be in the works for years, it wasn't commenced under Bush's watch.
That blows half the theory out of the water.
He did what so called professionals failed to do and he did it simplistically.
Did he or did he not do what all said was "impossible"?
Yes or no?
Why on earth would you be petitioning the government regarding 911? Do you have even an inkling how many lives have been saved by simply dialing those three digits?
No.
Have you ever watched a rail crew weld a rail line together with thermite? Clay crucible. It wasn't as if it was a big secret.
Commonsense and linear thinking isn't exactly something that can be shaken into someone. With the energy needed, you'd end up with something akin to shaken baby syndrome for adults.