Krauthammer Tells Inconvenient Truth About Egypt

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB

:smile::smile:
This thread needs to lighten up..
Haven't you heard, it needs IDF green to be kosher?

 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Ok so there you go.... I figured it would only be a matter of time before a few Democrats would be dragged out for supporting the Nazis...... regardless, they're all a part of the US government which supported Nazi Germany while the rest of the allies were doing all the dirty work. Sure the US helped the allies by supplies and manufacturing, but they were doing the same things for Germany too..... like a gun runner supplying both sides of a war to double their profit.

Did he really forget he wrote this?

Indeed, but ever since they were forced into WWII and had to lose a bunch of troops like the rest of the allied nations, they feel they have the right to continually shove it in our faces and are continually justified in invading and/or attack any nation they damn well please..... all the while justifying their actions by pointing out what happened when they sat on their ass and did nothing while the rest of us did something about it...... while making a bit of profit from the enemy I might add.


.

Now then. Refer back to the webpage provided and explain to me what exactly you were doing about it that we weren't.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
67
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
there are tons of online pics about hot IDF girls!

Of course, it was the US Gov who invented radical Islam.


Actually, it wasn't me who made that statement you quoted. But history does show that it was the CIA that financed OBL and helped radicalize parts of the Islamic world through its imperialism in that region. After all, did Iraq threaten the USA in any way? Of course not.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Funny how everybody else in this thread also didn't understand wtf you were going on about with that link in relation to what was being discussed...... but I suppose it all makes sense to you and Colpy.... maybe if I smoked what you guys were smoking, it'd make sense to me as well.


Everyone... meaning you and Gopher? lol

*Puffs on Eagle's Crack Pipe*

I get it now! The crack makes the maple leafs and battles morph into american flags and american forces, and that's why it looks like they actually did something useful prior to entering the war!


I wouldn't even go there. I do not use drugs at all.

YOU however are an ADMITTED user and have admitted that so MANY times here. Whenever the topic is drug use you are there supporting legalization and talking about your drug use INCLUDING ecstasy.

Then you say "I haven't smoked in a month" in this thread.

Having trouble setting up a connection down there druggie? lol



Yes it would be foolish to say that..... it's too damn bad for you that I never once said that. Show me where I said the US WASN'T supporting Britain with supplies...... oh that's right, you can't, because I never did say that and you're just being a troll like you always are in here.

Didn't you say we were "sitting on our butts while the rest of us were doing something about it."?

PWNED

Now how about you act like the troll you are and go crawl back under that bridge you came from and keep on smoking that crack of yours.

Wow... I struck a nerve didn't I druggie. You addict. You can't handle reality so you constantly numb your brain with weed and ecstasy. You admitted it.


That Candians' fought in a lot of battles and you like to try and drag a debate so off track that you hope it will confuse the original conversation so nobody see's just how much you screwed up and how much you ended up looking like a dolt for opening your mouth about things you obviously know nothing about.

Yes they did... starting after Pearl Harbor according to Canadian historians. HIGH FIVE! WE STARTED TOGETHER!

See what I mean by myths Prax?



Ha ha...... yup..... keep on chasing that rainbow sunshine....... If anything has been shown in all my posts in this forum over the years, is that I suck up and kiss people's asses because I worry about what they might think about me or what they might do to me...... and I most certainly worry about saying the wrong thing that might offend someone.......


Too funny and so true. You always did kiss everyones butts in here because you worried about your image.

Easy on the weed.


Thanks, but the category is "US Ships that Hunted Subs for the Allies Prior to Entering the War" which Colpy claimed and I'm still waiting for an example..... not US ships that were sunk by German subs while escorting supplies to the Allies, which has already been acknowledged that the US supplied allies during WWII....... they also traded and supplied Nazi Germany in a number of ways as well, both politically and economically, especially with private businesses.

Thanks for playing though. :roll:

So I suppose the German U-Boats let the ships carrying supplies to Germany slip by while attacking the ones going to England.

Nice one Prax.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Okay, Porter.... You can be right if it means soooo much to you. :roll:

It doesn't mean much to me at all.... I just am.

WTF do you think ESCORT DUTY and ICELAND means?

Funny, I thought I already explained this to you:

Escort Duty means to take a valued target from Point A to Point B generally in a designated path and defend with force if attacked....... it is not to deliberately seek out, attack and destroy the enemy such as sub hunting.

BTW.... Tell Wikipedia to place ALL brackets within the quote - that way you don't have to say it wasn't properly done.

Small potatoes, like I said, I got to the link.... the clicky thing just didn't work.

You have no clue. In 1940, putting yourself between the "wolf pack" and the merchant ships WAS sub hunting........

No it's not..... putting yourself between a valuable target and someone with a weapon to kill that target, thus taking the bullet and dying is called being a human sheild..... in order to "Hunt" something, you kind of need to have a weapon to take out/kill what you're hunting. Since this US ship wasn't even armed, they were just a human sheild, that's it.

Submarines, unlike in the movies, usually attacked while on the surface, so placing yourself between them and the convoy is the exact tactic you use to engage them.

It's still not hunting.

There go those goal posts again......your original accusation was that the USA was aiding the German war effort early in the war........

Which they were by still allowing trade and commerce between the US private sector & Germany and support from those in the political spectrum/office.... while all other allied nations didn't.

You still never disproved this and my "Goal Posts" still never changed spots..... fix your glasses.

now you are trying to argue the effectiveness of American efforts AGAINST German military operations.

No, I was arguing towards your claims of the US actually "Sub Hunting" German U-Boats prior to officially joining into the war..... that too has not change.

You've already lost the argument.

Give it up.

I haven't lost anything and my original points still stand.

'' US government is much more detrimental to world peace than even radical islam''

did you know that Bush was inspired by God (the prince of peace) to attack Iraq?

Indeed, he called it a Crusade against Evil Doers......

Crusade:
1. often Crusade Any of the military expeditions undertaken by European Christians in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries to recover the Holy Land from the Muslims.
2. A holy war undertaken with papal sanction.

Did he really forget he wrote this?

Compared to what everybody else was doing, yeah, nothing..... except what was already aknowledged, which was supplying and manufacturing for both sides..... which means yes, the US supplied and manufactured for the allies....... while also trading, dealing, supplying and commercing with Nazi Germany, which pretty well cancels everything out, thus.... nothing.

Now then. Refer back to the webpage provided and explain to me what exactly you were doing about it that we weren't.

Canada joined into the war seven days after Britain and France and Canada was active in every theatre of war during WWII, so you tell me what we were doing that you guys weren't.

Here, this should explain things in a more simple fashion for you:
Military history of Canada during World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
She can occupy me anytime! :smile:
I was trying to figure out how to work 'fox-hole duty' but ...... nuthin that would pass the sensors. At least she's dressed for dancin. Just sayin .... if being overrun is in the wind might as well try and settle in for a long hard ride and apparently you can hang em up wet and they work just fine the next day. I have to admit I feel like a bit of a **** as she was one of the very first that turned up on my search engine. g00gle
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I wouldn't even go there. I do not use drugs at all.

I doubt that.

YOU however are an ADMITTED user and have admitted that so MANY times here. Whenever the topic is drug use you are there supporting legalization and talking about your drug use INCLUDING ecstasy.

Your point being?

I have admitted it, big deal..... but you seem to be the one with the real problem by constantly dragging it back up in every other debate where it has no relation to what's being talked about to somehow try and use it against me like a typical troll...... as if it somehow bothers me.

Seems to bother you though..... would you care to talk about it? It might make you feel better. lol

Then you say "I haven't smoked in a month" in this thread.

Yup.... I haven't..... once again, your point? I only mentioned that because, once again, you brought it back up like a troll.

Having trouble setting up a connection down there druggie? lol

Nope, I can get it anytime I wish.... you having anger issues from your drug use, Stim head?

Didn't you say we were "sitting on our butts while the rest of us were doing something about it."?

Yup...... supplying isn't something I'd equate to what the rest of the allies were doing, especially when the US was also supplying and trading with Nazi Germany, which you still haven't discredited that claim.


Really?

Wow... I struck a nerve didn't I druggie. You addict. You can't handle reality so you constantly numb your brain with weed and ecstasy. You admitted it.

Use your brain for once dip sh*t..... if I was an addict I wouldn't have gone for over a month and more without weed would I?

And considering I haven't even touched X for about 5 years and have no interest in ever doing it again, that's a non issue......

It's nice to see that you finally stooped to direct personal insults and flat out trolling now..... that not only shows your level of maturity, but also your lack of ability to accept the truth in a debate and have nothing worthwhile to contribute to the debate.

Yes they did... starting after Pearl Harbor according to Canadian historians. HIGH FIVE! WE STARTED TOGETHER!

Guess again numb nuts...... refer back to the above link I just provided that shows we joined into the war a week after Britain and France..... Having problems reading dates and timelines are we? No wonder you're no longer on active duty.

See what I mean by myths Prax?

Nope.

Too funny and so true. You always did kiss everyones butts in here because you worried about your image.

Easy on the weed.

:roll: And people claim those who smoke pot have a short attention span.

So I suppose the German U-Boats let the ships carrying supplies to Germany slip by while attacking the ones going to England.

Nice one Prax.

Yup...... here's a little snippet of some of the US trading with Germany while every other nation fought against them:

UE News Feature: Nasty Nazi Business - Corporate Deals with Nazi Germany

"The year following the end of World War II, GE stood accused of criminal conspiracy with Krupp, a major German munitions firm. Their partnership artificially raised the cost of U.S. defense preparations while helping to subsidize Hitler’s rearmament of Germany. The arrangement continued even after Nazi tanks smashed into Poland.

GE was not alone among U.S. big business in having cordial, profitable arrangements with the corporations of Nazi Germany. Kodak, DuPont and Shell Oil are also known to have had business dealing with Germany. Due to a recent reparations case, the activities of General Motors and Ford are the most well known. And the cases are instructive:

GM and Ford, through their subsidiaries, controlled 70 percent of the German automobile market when war broke out in 1939. Those companies "rapidly retooled themselves to become suppliers of war materiel to the Germany army," writes Michael Dobbs in the Washington Post.

"When American GIs invaded Europe in June 1944, they did so in jeeps, trucks and tanks manufactured by the Big Three motor companies in one of the largest crash militarization programs ever undertaken," observes Dobbs. "It came as an unpleasant surprise to discover that the enemy was also driving trucks manufactured by Ford and Opel — a 100 percent GM-owned subsidiary — and flying Opel-built warplanes.""

Reality hitting you yet?

Probably not.

As I previously stated and has not changed..... The US played Gun Runner for both sides of the war to gain a profit, and since they supplied both the allies and axis, that contribution to the war effort was and is Moot.​
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
'' US government is much more detrimental to world peace than even radical islam''


did you know that Bush was inspired by God (the prince of peace) to attack Iraq?

President Bush just wanted Saddam out, but what this has to do with Egypt who knows
.
Beginning in late December 2001, President Bush met repeatedly with Army Gen. Tommy R. Franks and his war cabinet to plan the U.S. attack on Iraq even as he and administration spokesmen insisted they were pursuing a diplomatic solution, according to a new book on the origins of the war.
The intensive war planning throughout 2002 created its own momentum, according to "Plan of Attack" by Bob Woodward, fueled in part by the CIA's conclusion that Saddam Hussein could not be removed from power except through a war and CIA Director George J. Tenet's assurance to the president that it was a "slam dunk" case that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
Bush Began to Plan War Three Months After 9/11 (washingtonpost.com)