According to you (and your country) that should be (and is) your worldly duty if you want to be 'welcomed' in other lands without the warships in the background.
Which is a lie right there! lol Well at least you have been misinformed...
Iraq Body Count
Sorry charlie.
You are choosing figures that only count those who died from violence, like a bomb or live fire. I can count the civilians who died because the hospital was bombed so they could not obtain first aid for a 'minor ailment'. I can and will count all the civilians who died needlessly from the beginning of Gulf I as Gulf II was the 2nd phase of a 'plan' that had included phase I as a softening up part for the real invasion. Obviously giving you a link to the slant-drilling accusations are not going to change your view so look it up yourself if you care to.
"Documented civilian deaths from violence"
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/database/
I gave myself permission to mourn more than the ones who died from 'violence'. (read the list)
Those are the same ones (age, stature, method of death not restricted to being 'collateral damage') a 'violent death'. I am supposed to mourn for all the Jews and their similar persecution and deaths in Europe in WWII and I do as part of the sorrow that includes even the victims of Dresden. Stopping one form while still promoting heavy bombing in civilian sections would seem to be related, as far as civilians being killed.
So the Nazi's offered to send the Jooo trains west...but the west turned it down?
LMAO
While I try to find statements again that show that to be truthful (combined with something to show immigration to the 'West' (for Jews specifically) was tightened rather than being 'relaxed' even after the persecution was known to be happening).
From
The Journal of Historical Review, Fall 1985 (Vol. 6, No. 3), pages 369-373.
(in part)
Wyman makes no secret of his basic outlook. In the preface he describes himself as "strongly pro-Zionist" and a "resolute supporter of the state of Israel." He is a member of the Academic Advisory Board of the Simon Wiesenthal Center of Los Angeles. The bias that pervades this book is reflected, for example, in Wyman's reference to "the alleged Russian massacre of Polish officers at the Katyn forest." (p. 334. Emphasis added.) While eager to accept at face value the unsubstantiated Holocaust story, Wyman is unwilling to acknowledge the indisputably established Soviet slaughter of thousands of leading Poles in the Katyn forest near Smolensk.
Wyman devotes just three pages of "evidence" for the Holocaust itself, including a lengthy excerpt from the widely-quoted affidavit of Hermann Graebe (Nuremberg document 2992-PS) describing a mass shooting of Soviet Jews in 1942. Wyman does not mention (and probably does not know) that in 1964 and 1965 Graebe was proven to have been a professional liar who perjured himself in 145 Allied "war crimes" trials, and that his famous "eyewitness" affidavit is now thoroughly discredited. (See: Der Spiegel, 29 December 1965, pp. 25-28) Also cited is Göring's well-known letter of 31 July 1941 to Heydrich which Wyman describes as the "directive" for "the systematic extermination of all Jews in the Nazi grip." But as the letter's text (not given by Wyman) makes rather clear, and as Martin Broszat and some other anti-Hitler historians have conceded, Göring's reference to "the final solution of the Jewish question" in this key document meant peaceful emigration and deportation, not extermination.
Wyman's main charge is that the British and American political leaders, including President Roosevelt, turned down numerous proposals that they knew would have saved hundreds of thousands of European Jews from certain death at German hands. In doing so, Wyman argues, the Allied leaders showed inexcusable indifference, betrayed their own highly-touted moral principles, and therefore share some historical responsibility for the slaughter of European Jewry.
But there is another explanation for this apparently heinous negligence: Along with others in a position to know, the Allied leaders did not believe their own propaganda that Germany was systematically destroying Europe's Jews. (This point has already been dealt with at some length in The Journal by A. Butz, Winter 1982, and K.C. Gleason, Winter 1984.) Wyman assembles compelling evidence for this alternative explanation, but like other Holocaust historians, he ignores the obvious and tries instead to make the evidence fit his preconceived thesis. To the unbiased reader, the facts he presents actually cast severe doubt on the Holocaust story.
As Wyman repeatedly emphasizes, the U.S. and British governments turned down numerous proposals to accept European Jews out of fear that Hitler would eagerly turn over masses of Jews to the Allies. This issue was brought up, for example, at a White House conference on 27 March 1943 of top American and British wartime leaders, including President Roosevelt, U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull, British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, presidential advisor Harry Hopkins and the British Ambassador to Washington, Lord Halifax. Hull raised the question of having the Allies offer to accept 60,000 to 70,000 Jews from Bulgaria, a German ally. Eden replied
that the whole problem of the Jews in Europe is very difficult and that we should move cautiously about offering to take all Jews out of a country like Bulgaria. If we do that, then the Jews of the world will be wanting us to make similar offers in Poland and Germany. Hitler might well take us up on any such offer and there simply are not enough ships and means of tranportation in the world to handle them.
The conference record shows that no one present objected to or even questioned Eden's statement. Apparently no one really believed the Allied story that the Jews of Poland and Germany were being exterminated.
Oooooo... the American Military Secret Police.... ooooooooo.
Wtf are you talking about? lol
LiveLeak.com - CIA and Nazis 1946
Watch Video Bill Moyer 1947 American Nazi Takeover The Secret at blinkx
CLOSE [X]
Bill Moyer 1947 American Nazi Takeover The Secret Government a documentary outlining the creation of the CIA by the NAZI remnants from WW2 that Prescott Bush and others were working with. MI5 CIA Vatican the unholy trinity.
This is how they operate even today. I was under the impression that it is because they are an arm of the Military and that is why they are 'forbidden' from operating within the borders of the US. Shin Bet would be the Israeli equal to the CIA with Mossad and the FBI being also equal counterparts.
Secrets of CIA.avi
Secrets of CIA.avi
2:02:15 - 3 years ago
This documentary explains how CIA pioneered, developed,manipulated prisoner abuse, sold drugs, changed regimes and killed millions of people world wide.
They would be the ones reaping the financial rewards from any increase in drug profits in Afghanistan, same as their operations during Viet Nam.
YouTube - CIA Drug Trafficking And Money Making
Short Clip Cia has had their fingers wrapped around most of the problems in the world, when they cause it.