What difference would that free expertise have made? None. It is what it is. Would Bush or any Rep have convinced BP (or shook them down) for 20 billion? Not a chance in a lifetime.
Bush would not have done that, he would heve done what Barton wanted done, he would have left BP to handle the leak as they saw best. BP would have done the minimum required legally (which is very little).
Bush if anything would have been even more sympathetic to BP than, Burton. Bush was an oil executive himself and as such his loyalties were with oil industry.
SJPEstimates from other experts were out within days disputing the size of the leak so blaming BP does not cut the mustard
Those experts were basing their conclusion upon what they saw on TV, BP did not make the actual video available until much later. BP estimates were based upon what was actually going on.
Now, as it turned out, BP was deliberately low balling the estimates and teh experts (who had to rely on TV picture) were closer to the truth. But Obama had no way fo knowing that at that time.
How ironic it is that he's criticized for not relying on the expertise of another country. Listening to others is generally considered an act of treason and communism in the US.
Quite so, if he had put foreigners in charge and if they had screwed things up, he would also have been blamed big time.
It really does not make any difference what he did or didn’t do. His actions must be judged by the final results, and the final results no doubt are tragic. Obama was clearly wrong in putting his faith in BP numbers (although to be fair, Bush would have done the same thing, he would have relied on BP even more than Obama did).
Obama certainly has been a lot more successful than Bush. But if he has one major fault, it's his inability to get Dems to publicly demand more cooperation from the GOP. In this regard it is Speaker Pelosi who needs to stand up but she just doesn't have the kind of political or personal strength to stand up and do so forcefully.
Pelosi does not need any cooperation from Republicans. Her job is to keep Democrats in line and she has been very successful in doing that. House has passed many bills with Democratic support, some of which are languishing in the Senate, going nowhere, because of Republican filibuster.
But Pelois does not need Republicans, Harry Reid does. But Pelosi is a much better politician than Reid, she has been very successful in the House (were a simple majority is needed to pass anything).
Perhaps if she had been the Senate leader, we may have seen better results.