... or that more jobs that Canadians value should be made available.Even before the recession, our high immigration levels were high.
Fact: We have jobs. But jobs Canadians do not want. This is a sign immigration needs to be reduced.
... or that more jobs that Canadians value should be made available.Even before the recession, our high immigration levels were high.
Fact: We have jobs. But jobs Canadians do not want. This is a sign immigration needs to be reduced.
... or that more jobs that Canadians value should be made available.
If you have a car or two and a home, will going to a minimum wage job cover your expenses? Would 2 jobs? I don't think so. This recession was a controlled demolition. It was manufactured to get people to accept less wages. The rich get richer even in an economic down turn. That is because they control the market. They just let you think you count but you can bet that all those who lost money were intentionally fleeced.
Why the hell would they need a bail out when they lend money to the Govt of Canada that is created out of thin air?
They have you bent over AND have YOU giving not getting the reach around.
Why the **** would they want or even need anything else from us?
Some stimulus, but I think it was too much because we have jobs in Canada going begging. So how much stimulus is needed? Not just markets run on blind fear. How much debt can we accumulate?
How much debt can we accumulate? You may be leaning to the right (I think), but here you are talking like a liberal. Conservatives as a rule are not bothered by the deficit and the debt.
But you are right, something will have to be done about the debt and the deficit. Unfortunately, I don't see Harper doing anything to curb deficit spending. The finance minister, Flaherty, ran up huge debt and huge deficit when he was Finance Minister in Ontario, in Harris cabinet. I don't see why he would do anything different in Ottawa.
Unfortunately that's a myth. Their collective spending is canceled out by an increased service load.
Sure they put money into the economy, but they draw more then they have contributed, via social services, health care, EI, CPP, and so on.
This doesn't include the sponsored immigration of elderly family members, once citizenship is achieved.
What would be so bad about that?That may well be correct, but I suspect it is not if the children of immigrants are considered. However, Canada, with a replacement rate of 1.4 per woman does not really have much choice unless you want to see Canada's population decline.
What would be so bad about that?
I'm sure some immigrants take jobs Canadians don't want, but most of the immigrants I know are highly educated and work in the IT industry. The Canadian government didn't pay for their education. India and Pakistan did. These people come here ready to work, are immediately highly productive and start paying taxes. They create wealth and jobs. They contribute to Canada.
The average Indian or Pakistani can't afford to come to Canada and don't qualify anyway. Canada's immigration policy tends to siphon off the best and brightest from these countries. Good for Canada, too bad for India and Pakistan.
Another immigrant I know came to Canada from Vietnam in the late 1970's as a boat person. He had nothing but his skill as a chef. For 10 years he worked as a short order cook flipping hamburgers and deep frying french fries. But he saved his pennies and opened his own restaurant which was a success. Then he opened a bigger restaurant and it was a bigger success. Now he is the CEO of his town's Chamber of commerce and a successful entrepaneur. In 30 years he went from nothing to something. He volunteers his time for the community and contributes to charities. Lot of Canadians had nothing 30 years ago and today they still have nothing.
When I hear unemployed people on welfare complain about immigrants taking their jobs, I'm disgusted. Unless you are sick or infirm, get off your ass and get a job. Lots of work exists here in Canada and the difference between most immigrants and most Canadian welfare recipients is attitude.
I fully support Canada's immigration policies which attract the best and brightest from the rest of the world. These people are no burden and make Canada wealthier and more prosperous.
What would be so bad about that?
Ask any businessman what he thinks about his customer base getting smaller and you will understand.
So, what about this global economy they keep talking about? Canadian business has the mantra these days they are "global." So why can't they get customers from around the globe to make up for this future debateable deficiency? A smaller population in one country should not necessarily less businesses in another.
How come the magic of the market (being global) doesn't seem capable of handling this problem? There is no problem here with a falling population. In the nicest place in the world, a falling population simply will not happen.
The largest market for any nation is always the domestic market. Canada is unusual in that 40% of its GNP depends on exports, however, that still leaves 60% of its GNP depending on Canadians.