Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Tonington said:
Fail. Nature is not a mechanism.

I'm all ears if you can find a mechanism. Until then, I'm sticking with the mechanism which can explain it. Radiative physics...the greenhouse effect.
Click to expand...

LMAO!

Well Walt....your move.
 
A

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Walter said:
What really cinched it for me years ago before I had made-up my mind about AGW was the preponderance of Libs and lefties who agreed with the AGW's and the vast majority of righties who thought it was all bs. Something so politicized has nothing at all to do with science and everything to do with controlling people's lives.
Click to expand...
So your decision is all political and not scientific. That figures. Who cares what science says, politicians say we have AGW so the science must be nuts when it says we have AGW. Right .... I see.
I've changed my mind twice so far on this issue and it's been because I have seen a lot of science and ignored the politics.
 
A

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
big said:
Technology is used against natural cycles.
Click to expand...
Um, yeah. That would be another way of saying that sometimes some technology is misused. But you don't think natural cycles have done anything to contribute to warming? You think it's entirely anthropogenic? lmao
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
114,224
13,107
113
Low Earth Orbit
Every 230 years man falls into the "Dip**** Cycle" where stupidity rules and society decays into chaos and mass death.

Enjoy it while it lasts.
 
big

big

Time Out
Oct 15, 2009
562
4
18
Quebec
AnnaG said:
Um, yeah. That would be another way of saying that sometimes some technology is misused. But you don't think natural cycles have done anything to contribute to warming? You think it's entirely anthropogenic? lmao
Click to expand...

You have an incorrect way to ask (already answered) questions.
 
A

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Walter said:
What really cinched it for me years ago before I had made-up my mind about AGW was the preponderance of Libs and lefties who agreed with the AGW's and the vast majority of righties who thought it was all bs. Something so politicized has nothing at all to do with science and everything to do with controlling people's lives.
Click to expand...

Yet another statement that isn't true, many conservatives do believe in AGW Walt and many conservative governments have taken action. Mike Harris was the first government in Canada to set out policy to curb emissions....was Harris a lefty?

Bush and Harper also have taken steps, they believed in it just not policy such as Cap and Trade.

Tell me the truth, was the conservative who convinced you in the mirror?
 
big

big

Time Out
Oct 15, 2009
562
4
18
Quebec
Avro said:
Yet another statement that isn't true, many conservatives do believe in AGW Walt and many conservative governments have taken action. Mike Harris was the first government in Canada to set out policy to curb emissions....was Harris a lefty?

Bush and Harper also have taken steps, they believed in it just not policy such as Cap and Trade.

Tell me the truth, was the conservative who convinced you in the mirror?
Click to expand...

You mention only three conservatives, this is not a majority of them nor that many.
 
Last edited:
A

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
big said:
Walter said a (vast) majority.
Click to expand...

What's vast?

Let's see the polls, currently 76% of the U.S. population believes in AGW, 76% are not liberals or tree hugging bleeding hearts.

So either the remaining 24% aren't sure or don't believe in AGW.

I don't see vast....perhaps you should get him to explain how he came to that conclusion.
 
big

big

Time Out
Oct 15, 2009
562
4
18
Quebec
Avro said:
What's vast?

Let's see the polls, currently 76% of the U.S. population believes in AGW, 76% are not liberals or tree hugging bleeding hearts.

So either the remaining 24% aren't sure or don't believe in AGW.

I don't see vast....perhaps you should get him to explain how he came to that conclusion.
Click to expand...

Bottom line, you cannot contradict someone who wrote "the vast majority of righties" by saying "many conservatives…"
 
Last edited:
A

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
big said:
You have an incorrect way to ask (already answered) questions.
Click to expand...
:roll: I don't care. You talk funny, too. nyah nyah

I haven't noticed you answering many questions at all. Most of what I have seen from you is goofy little comments and a lot of those aren't exactly lucid.
 
A

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
big said:
You mention only three conservatives, this is not a majority of them nor that many.
Click to expand...
I have the list of all the conservatives in Canada and it indicates which ones believe the data about AGW. If you give me your email, I will send you the list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom