Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
- Status
Now that you are part of the "in crowd", I'll fill you in on a secret.
Foil is useless, use brass mesh!
LOL I'd say that's more appropriately applied to other more "eccentric" members of these forums. Damn funny though--can I use that one?
Sure. I don't see it interfering with my patent on RFID proof hats and wallets.LOL I'd say that's more appropriately applied to other more "eccentric" members of these forums. Damn funny though--can I use that one?
Haven't heard that one but there was a thread here saying that the artic may be ice free last summer.
The tin foil hatters are telling us we should wear them. Reverse psychology I suppose.
I was just at the beach...same way it looked when I was a kid. The pier is still there, jetty, boardwalk. Ah well...maybe next century eh?
So? In case you missed the point, and it looks like it went whizzing over your head at the speed of a flying snail, clouds shade the ground.
Actually, really good shielding is lead foil. And I think a couple people here have been using it for a very long time and the Pb has leached inwards.
Educated guesses are what they are. They are still better than flat out denial of accurate evidence.
Say a war between the United States (Marine corps) and eco-terrorists. Talking of global warming as a scam is indeed purely tactical.
7.2.2 Cloud Processes and Feedbacks
7.2.2.4 Cloud-radiative feedback processes
It is unbelievable that the most important feedback could make human produced Global Warming extremely serious or just a lot of nonsense - but they still can not determine even the sign of the feedback. At least there is a consensus so that there is no longer a need for scientific inquiry.
Perhaps I should have said, clouds are not understood by the IPCC.
7.2.2.4 Cloud-radiative feedback processes
In response to any climate perturbation the response of cloudiness thereby introduces feedbacks whose sign and amplitude are largely unknown.
The sign of the cloud cover feedback is still a matter of uncertainty and generally depends on other related cloud properties. Cloud optical feedbacks produced by these GCMs, however, differ both in sign and strength.
7.2.2.5 Representation of cloud processes in models The sign of the cloud cover feedback is still a matter of uncertainty and generally depends on other related cloud properties. Cloud optical feedbacks produced by these GCMs, however, differ both in sign and strength.
In spite of these improvements, there has been no apparent narrowing of the uncertainty range associated with cloud feedbacks in current climate change simulations. A straight-forward approach of model validation is not sufficient to constrain the models efficiently and a more dedicated approach is needed.
Note - Section 7.2.2.5 has a graph showing which models consider clouds as positive or negative feedback mechanisms. It is unbelievable that the most important feedback could make human produced Global Warming extremely serious or just a lot of nonsense - but they still can not determine even the sign of the feedback. At least there is a consensus so that there is no longer a need for scientific inquiry.
Perhaps I should have said, clouds are not understood by the IPCC.
Are you not here, confusingly, asking for too much benevolence on the part of the scientific community?
ROFL
Oh about the connection between the melting ice and sea levels: it's not the melted ice that adds to the water and increases levels (it does but not significantly) but rather the resulting temperature increase from that process that eventually raises sea levels.
Because I don't think that I will be having beach front property in about 20 years makes me a foiler? :lol:
Yup. You claim that here it is a money making conspiracy lead by scientists purposefully giving misleading information.
That is what a conspiracy is............FOILER!!!
- Status