I thought I was pretty clear. Let me say it again. I am not against someone having multiple spouses if the informed consent is there. I am against sex-slavery and old men marrying children, and human trafficking. If you read back I said that the Crown was idiotic in going for polygamy charges instead of offenses I mentioned. If they didn't have enough to charge Blackmore and others with sex-slavery, human trafficking, etc. then they should have held off until they could. This polygamy stuff is a waste of investigative time and taxpayers' money. It's frivolous and it has the wrong focus.Then you are against underage marriage, forced marriages and exploitation. All of these issues are side issues to plural marriage between consenting adults. If you read the above posts you will see many people who oppose plural marriages are really against these other things. Its not different than people who oppose same sex marriage and they justify their position by arguing against men having sex with children, which is another issue.
He could only be charged with rape if he had sex with them. And no, it isn't too late; in Canada there's no "statute of limitations" on offenses more serious than "summary" offenses.In this case, Blackmore married four girls who were 15 at the time. His relationships with these young people from the time they were married until 18 was only legal if the parents and the girls consented and Blackthorn isn't in a position of trust or authority. Since Blackthorn is the community's religious leader, he is an authority and he could have been charged with rape. If these women are older than 18 now and consent to their relationship, then its too late.
The polygamy thing only might be shot down under the freedom of religion thing because it may be argued that having more than one spouse is not affording those spouses equality. Equality is under the charter, too.The government should charge polygamists who marry young people under 18 with both polygamy and rape. The rape charges could stick, depending on the situation and testimony. At a minimum the rape charges would cause the polygamous communities to stop authorizing underage marriages, which most people agree is a problem. The polygamy charges would likely end up in the supreme court where Canada's polygamy law would be struck down as contradicting Canada's Charter and Constitution. Law makers would then have to come up with new laws to protect the legal rights of plural marriage spouses and their children in cases of separation and divorce.
Fine.Right now only the first wife and her children have legal rights and I see that as the real issue regarding polygamy.
Fine.What consenting adults do of their own free will sexually or relationship wise, is their business not mine.
Last edited: