Another Hypocrite Bites Dust!
- Thread starter SirJosephPorter
- Start date
*forehead slap*
okay... we're apparently devolving tonight (guilty of it myself!) so I'm gonna head off the computer. lol.
okay... we're apparently devolving tonight (guilty of it myself!) so I'm gonna head off the computer. lol.
I see the liberal racist is defending what is indefensible once again. He reminds me of a horror flick zombie...mindless, unthinking and droning on with low guttural sounds (in this case his posts)
Mine are strapless. I have many toys. I have to be careful with the cuffs, though. I lost one of the keys.
So you are defending Mike Duvall, are you? Well, as a conservative you would, I suppose.
Tsk-tsk! Such behaviour from the windbag one.
You've got him on the ropes Anna.... Wrap them around his ...
You've got him on the ropes Anna.... Wrap them around his ...
Sir Jo, it was YOU who brought up the homosexual issue here, as my post stated. Your 'conservative hyprocrisy' referred directly and explicitly to Duvall's
condemnation of homosexual marriage as its example of that hypocrisy. This is your statement
So i suggest you chose your examples more carefully if you don't want to open the Pandora's Box of homosexual affirmation and all its predation and degrading effects on society and the individual. Otherwise one might accuse YOU of hypocrisy. ;-)
Last edited:
Joey is allowed to discuss homosexual issues "we" are not. If you are going to get involved in these discussions, you need to understand the rules beforehand.
Ouite right, Cannuck. He truly is the man with the red-carpet-tongue. I wonder how the return loop is re threaded through the vocal mechanism?
Sir Jo, it was YOU who brought up the homosexual issue here, as my post stated. Your 'conservative hyprocrisy' referred directly and explicitly to Duvall's
condemnation of homosexual marriage as its example of that hypocrisy. This is your statement
True enough, Coldstream.
So i suggest you chose your examples more carefully if you don't want to open the Pandora's Box of homosexual affirmation and all its predation and degrading effects on society and the individual.
Now, I don’t see that. I am not commenting on homosexuality per se here (though I assume you know that we disagree on the subject, and if you post a separate thread, I will be happy to discuss it with you). I was referring to homosexuality only to the extent of pointing out the hypocrisy of Duvall.
Let me give you an analogous example. Suppose Duvall says that murder is wrong and he commits murder. He is guilty of hypocrisy (besides being guilty of murder). This is regardless of whether murder is right or wrong. The same is the case here.
condemnation of homosexual marriage as its example of that hypocrisy. This is your statement
True enough, Coldstream.
So i suggest you chose your examples more carefully if you don't want to open the Pandora's Box of homosexual affirmation and all its predation and degrading effects on society and the individual.
Now, I don’t see that. I am not commenting on homosexuality per se here (though I assume you know that we disagree on the subject, and if you post a separate thread, I will be happy to discuss it with you). I was referring to homosexuality only to the extent of pointing out the hypocrisy of Duvall.
Let me give you an analogous example. Suppose Duvall says that murder is wrong and he commits murder. He is guilty of hypocrisy (besides being guilty of murder). This is regardless of whether murder is right or wrong. The same is the case here.
Let me give you an analogous example. Suppose Clinton says that adultery is wrong and he commits adultery. He is guilty of hypocrisy (besides being guilty of adultery). This is regardless of whether adultery is right or wrong. The same is the case here.
Or, for example, if he claimed to be a Catholic, he would be a hypocrite for being an adulterer as well.