Could Jason Kenny Be the Next PM

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I think you have to be a fat ugly guy to be a Tory so they don't have much choice.
lol It doesn't stop at Tories.
Look at this fat lump (that's Martin on the left):




and this thing sure ain't pretty. lol Hard to say if he's smiling or grimacing:


and look at this thing:
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
It wasn't a law. It was an order based on Van Loan's ministry's opinion (or assessment). The opinion or assessment was out to lunch. Kenney can reverse the order and he doesn't have to change any laws to do that.

I'm not suggesting that Kenny couldn't or can't do anything. My argument is about whether he should. In your world, the public safety department makes rules and the immigration department ignores them. That is not a recipe for a well run and effective government. It is a recipe for a disjointed incremental approach to problem solving and is, in my opinion, one of the biggest problems we have in government. Far from being criticized, Kenny should be given a pat on the back for his handling of this case as well as the George Galloway incident.
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
First off, as much as I liked Jason Kenney as the head of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and approved of his performance as my MP while I was living in Calgary, I have doubts about him as an effective national leader. I think his work ethic and personality enable him in being an effective minister and party whip personality but he has issues that don't reflect well as far as Prime Ministerial ambitions go.

a) Central Canada does not trust Western leaders. Period. Ontario and Quebec are never happy unless they are constantly pandered to, whatever your feelings about how justified it is or not, and Western politicians tend to have less sensitivity in bruising Central Canadian feelings.

b) Kenney tends to be overly sarcastic and flippant at times. One of the occasions I remember best was in the Gay Marriage debate when he insisted homosexuals already had the right to be married in Canada... to a member of the opposite sex. That type of answer adds nothing to the debate of an important issue.

c) Kenney's social conservatism. He is one, although not perhaps as overt or well known for it as Harper. I think the CPC needs a social moderate if it wants to expand its appeal.

As for specifics, I think its a little early to be getting on Kenney over the Lennikov case: the fact that there are still ongoing legal avenues (such as the September judicial review as shown by a link above) says that the case is not closed, thus the Minister doesn't need to intervene. Ministers should be setting policy not micro-managing individual cases.
 

pegger

Electoral Member
Dec 4, 2008
397
8
18
Cambridge, Ontario
a) Central Canada does not trust Western leaders. Period. Ontario and Quebec are never happy unless they are constantly pandered to, whatever your feelings about how justified it is or not, and Western politicians tend to have less sensitivity in bruising Central Canadian feelings.

:roll:

Oh please. Substitute Alberta for Ontario and Quebec, and it's the same sentiment - the only difference is 65% of the population of the country is from Ontario/Quebec, and 10-15% is from Alberta. Perhaps if a leader from the West came and s/he wasn't a complete putz, the East would have no problem voting for them. There is much more anti-Eastern bias than Anti-Western bias, in my experience.

I would say points 2 and 3 would be a bigger reason why Ontario and Quebec would not vote for Kenney than point 1.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
:roll:

Oh please. Substitute Alberta for Ontario and Quebec, and it's the same sentiment

No. Albertans don't want to be pandered to. They generally want to see less of Ottawa than more. That's why the Dippers don't do particularly well in this province.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
The basic concept of Canada from day 1 till somewhere later in the 20th century that the rest of Canada (lLower Canada and Rupert's Land) existed for the benefit of Upper Canada and in some ways still is that way. Most of Canadians cannot handle anyone from outside of Ontario or Quebec having their hands on the reins. Well guess where most Canadians live ...

Upper Canada is the orange bit:


Lower Canada is the green bit and the rest is Rupert's Land:

 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Because, other than Upper Canada and Lower Canada, there was New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland, none of which are/were Rupert's Land.
 

pegger

Electoral Member
Dec 4, 2008
397
8
18
Cambridge, Ontario
No. Albertans don't want to be pandered to. They generally want to see less of Ottawa than more. That's why the Dippers don't do particularly well in this province.

That's not the sentiment I am referring to. I'm referring to the "do not trust Eastern leaders" sentiment.

BTW - most Ontario-ans don't want to be "pandered" to either. Perhaps Toronto is different, but where I live, we would rather the Feds back off some too. Check the electoral map - quite a few Conservatives were elected here.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
That's not the sentiment I am referring to. I'm referring to the "do not trust Eastern leaders" sentiment.


You are wrong on that account as well. Albertans don't have a problem with eastern leaders. Peter MacKay would sell pretty good out here. Albertans have a problem with Quebec leaders...probably because the country has been screwed by them almost nonstop for the last 40 years.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Because, other than Upper Canada and Lower Canada, there was New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland, none of which are/were Rupert's Land.
Well, it's been a few years since I took history. And I hated it. lol Memorizing dates and events instead of what was important about the event that happened on such and such a date was/is a waste of brainspace. :) I still think so.
 

pegger

Electoral Member
Dec 4, 2008
397
8
18
Cambridge, Ontario
You are wrong on that account as well. Albertans don't have a problem with eastern leaders. Peter MacKay would sell pretty good out here. Albertans have a problem with Quebec leaders...probably because the country has been screwed by them almost nonstop for the last 40 years.

They bitch a lot about leaders from Ontario as well... when I say "East" I mean Ontario/Quebec. Guess I should use "central" (although, in my mind, that's Manitoba...)