Scientists find active 'super-thermite' in WTC dust

Free your mind

Electoral Member
Apr 14, 2009
228
4
18
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports
June 17, 2009 PDF
Respected Medical Professionals Launch New 9/11 Truth Group Announces Online Petition Calling for New Investigation
Feb. 24, 2009 MS Word Article on OpEdNews
Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11 Official Account of 9/11 “Impossible”, “A Bunch of Hogwash”, “Total B.S.”, “Ludicrous”, “A Well-Organized Cover-up”, “A White-Washed Farce”
Jan. 14, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews
Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 Official Account of 9/11 "Flawed", "Absurd", "Totally Inadequate", "a Cover-up"
Jan. 5, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews
Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 InvestigationOfficial Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash", "Fatally Flawed"
Dec. 13, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews
Eight Senior Republican Administration Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11"Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False"
Dec. 4, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews
 

Free your mind

Electoral Member
Apr 14, 2009
228
4
18
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of
defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility.
I welcome it. — John F. Kennedy

And so do i
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
you have not read all of the 200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials....

I've read enough to realize that most don't believe a there was conspiracy behind the attack. Most believe there was a cover-up after the fact. It's called ass-covering. Most people know the difference and don't confuse them.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
No Colpy i said they were small if your going to pick a bone make sure it is not your own leg your chewing

looks like you got youre foot in mouth pal

You can't even carry on a conversation.

Now TRY to make sense of this.......

Dexter said the fires were intense.

You denied they were small.

But Dexter never said they were small HE said they were intense.

So you were proving something was untrue....that he never said......thus your case sort of falls apart....down into its own footprint, if you will.

That's OK, I'm sure its a conspiracy
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]The key problem today is that the bulk of Americans get their news from the television...[/FONT]
Another serious problem is that a lot of people get their news and information from web sites run by morons who don't understand such elementary things as reason, logic, evidence, plausibility, and probability. Most of what's out there on the Web, probably 80% of it, is crap. Anyone with rudimentary computer skills and an axe to grind can put up a web site full of nonsense for other people to cite in support of their loony ideas. You've been tricked by some of them.
 

Free your mind

Electoral Member
Apr 14, 2009
228
4
18
You can't even carry on a conversation.

Now TRY to make sense of this.......

Dexter said the fires were intense.

You denied they were small.
No i did not Colpy read again slowly so it sinks in I SAID THEY WERE SMALL FIRES I DID NOT DENY THAT THEY WERE SMALL I SAID THAT THEY WERE.!

But Dexter never said they were small HE said they were intense.
I POINT YOU TO THE FIRST ANSWER THAT I GAVE .!

So you were proving something was untrue....that he never said......thus your case sort of falls apart....down into its own footprint, if you will.
NO IT DOES NOT Colpy this just proves you read what you want to read and judging by your comments you probably only hear what you want ALSO


That's OK, I'm sure its a conspiracy

No its not Colpy im sure you need glasses
 

Free your mind

Electoral Member
Apr 14, 2009
228
4
18
i've read enough to realize that most don't believe a there was conspiracy behind the attack.
is the a retraction to your position on this subject, are you now backtracking on what you have said
most believe there was a cover-up after the fact.
it's called ass-covering
.no wrong again its called murder.
most people know the difference and don't confuse them
.
you it seems cant tell the difference between lies and murder
 

Kakato

Time Out
Jun 10, 2009
4,929
21
38
Alberta/N.W.T./Sask/B.C
It is possible.

I used to work in an 80 floor office tower there is a lot of activity and maintenance people are doing lots of work on a daily bases putting new devices constantly upgrading taking out old devices ripping down old offices and building new offices on the various floors.

Bombs come in all shapes and sizes not just the big stick of dynamite that you light the wick with a wooden match.

There are small bombs that can fit in the palm of your hand and if a lot of little charges drilled into support structure can bring part of a building down.

A lot of this work is carried out during the night when everyone is at home.

Unless the police officer has been trained in bomb recognition most officers wouldn’t know what they are looking at.

In my opinion the WTC came down because it was poorly built by not building to code that New York is famous for.

Your right they come in all sizes,the det cap that sets off the booster is tiny but will still take your head off,now if there was explosives in that building then I guarantee you there would be some very sick people around,not only is it very caustic to skin just contact with it will bring on a pounding headache.
The amount of explosives needed to bring down the towers even with the main supports weakened would be massive.
Setting up any kind of blast is something that isnt done quietly at night.
 

Kakato

Time Out
Jun 10, 2009
4,929
21
38
Alberta/N.W.T./Sask/B.C
Another serious problem is that a lot of people get their news and information from web sites run by morons who don't understand such elementary things as reason, logic, evidence, plausibility, and probability. Most of what's out there on the Web, probably 80% of it, is crap. Anyone with rudimentary computer skills and an axe to grind can put up a web site full of nonsense for other people to cite in support of their loony ideas. You've been tricked by some of them.

When they start quoting Jones then I know hes got another sheep in his flock,buying his books and filling his bank accounts for him while he laughs all the way to the bank.

The guys not stupid,he knows how to play to the minds of the gullible and ignorant.
They after all are making him a very rich man.
 
Last edited:

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
And of course let us not forget the story about a California woman who served as the butt of a practical joke in the new movie "Bruno" is suing its star for emotional distress, E! Online reported. Richelle Olson claims Sacha Baron Cohen caused a big disturbance during her 2007 charity bingo game, one that sparked a physical altercation. The unstaged scene did not make it into the final cut of the film.
Now this is just as important as thermite and the WTC.
 

Kakato

Time Out
Jun 10, 2009
4,929
21
38
Alberta/N.W.T./Sask/B.C
What gets me is how people who are credible experts in their fields are constantly having their quotes taken out of context by the foiler camp,you can find it in any long cutnpaste,the real quotes and the mis use of them are pretty well covered on the debunking 9/11 website.

Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."

Romero, who agrees with the scientific conclusion that fire triggered the collapses, demanded a retraction from the Journal. It was printed Sept. 22, 2001. "I felt like my scientific reputation was on the line." But emperors-clothes.com saw something else: "The paymaster of Romero's research institute is the Pentagon. Directly or indirectly, pressure was brought to bear, forcing Romero to retract his original statement." Romero responds: "Conspiracy theorists came out saying that the government got to me. That is the farthest thing from the truth. This has been an albatross around my neck for three years." - Van D. Romero, Ph.D. in Physics

Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and controlled demolition - Structural and Civil Engineers against Controlled Demolition