Chinese ships play dangerous game with US researchers

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Like I said: Imperialists always think they own everything.

Freedom isn't the right to tromp around where ever you like and to spy on whomever you like. Perhaps the Chinese feel the South China Sea should be free of vermin looking for another country to invade illegally, for example?

And the Chinese do not spy on us? My aren't we the hypocrit.

Freedom is freedom as you define it I suppose.

Freedom of the Seas baby. I bet we got the info we needed too.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC

barney

Electoral Member
Aug 1, 2007
336
9
18
Yup. The savings of Chinese peasants have been funding our unsustainable lifestyle for the last 20 years. Paying it back is going to be a real bitch when we having nothing to offer in return. What happens at that point?

More toys.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Your off topic. The discussion is the USA spying on China - try and focus.

Very much on topic but you don't like what I had to say.



You bet and that was that China isn't your bitch :lol:

Sending a bunch of trawlers to throw trash. Oooookay.

I bet we found all those neat little hiding spots for those diesel subs they have. Maybe one day there will be a nice little present waiting for them if they decide to get silly.
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
Why wouldn't a country harass a ship sent to spy on them?

Imperialists always think they own everything.

I don't like the title of this thread. It should be: Americans play a dangerous game with Chinese sovereignty.

Geez, I wonder if they parked a Russian surveillance ship outside of Quantico it'd attract any attention:roll:

The US are lucky the Chinese didn't sink it ala Pueblo
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,765
14,780
113
Low Earth Orbit
Very much on topic but you don't like what I had to say.





Sending a bunch of trawlers to throw trash. Oooookay.

I bet we found all those neat little hiding spots for those diesel subs they have. Maybe one day there will be a nice little present waiting for them if they decide to get silly.
Are you talking about hose nice Chinese diesel electric subs that popped up in the middle of a US battlegroup making the entire US navy useless?

This is just too damn funny.


The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced

By MATTHEW HICKLEY
Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007

When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.
At least a dozen warships (including Canadian frigates) provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.
That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.
Scroll down for more ...
Uninvited guest: A Chinese Song Class submarine, like the one that sufaced by the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk



American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.

By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.

According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the U.S. Navy.
The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat.

One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age.
The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon.


Scroll down for more ...
Battle stations: The Kitty Hawk carries 4,500 personnel


The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or submarines.
And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it.

According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines.
It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence.
Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign powers which try to interfere in its "backyard".
The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two nuclear-missile launching vessels.
Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect when running on electric motors.
Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War.
He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans.
"It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard, particularly in relation to Taiwan."
In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a satellite in orbit for the first time.


ha ha ha ha ha
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Funny how the Americans take offense about this, yet they never complained about the USS Liberty.
 

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
I remember back in the day reading something that said most of the AEGIS systems the chinesse use were stolen from the states, i dont have a link... It was a long time ago i read it
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,765
14,780
113
Low Earth Orbit
I remember back in the day reading something that said most of the AEGIS systems the chinesse use were stolen from the states, i dont have a link... It was a long time ago i read it
Stolen or did Clinton exchange it for debt relief like he did with nuclear tech?
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Very much on topic but you don't like what I had to say.

I didn't mind it but it wasn't relevant to the topic. You were trying to change the subject. I'm sure you know that though.




Sending a bunch of trawlers to throw trash. Oooookay.

If that's all it takes then why not?

It's called being fiscally responsible and following the principles of mini max, something your country might consider learning about.
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
How did "US Researchers" (the OP's words in the title) get on a US Navy spy ship?

The mission of Impeccable is to directly support the Navy by using SURTASS passive and active low frequency sonar arrays to detect and track undersea threats.

...and what did they do to threaten it?

The Impeccable was shadowed by five Chinese ships, including a Bureau of Maritime Fisheries Patrol Vessel, a State Oceanographic Administration patrol vessel, a Chinese Navy intelligence collection ship, and two small Chinese-flagged trawlers.

Considering where it was (inside China's inclusion zone for miilitary vessels) and what it was doing (spying), it was very lucky it wasn't sunk or boarded

I guess the US has forgotten the Pueblo incident.

USS Pueblo (AGER-2) is a Banner-class "technical research ship" (Navy intelligence) which was boarded and captured by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea, or short DPRK) on 23 January 1968
 
Last edited: