I have openly stated that better research into gun control is necessary in order to validate that policy, but you would rather ignore that inconvenient point and continue to argue with some fictitious version of me that you made up in your head.
If you want to argue against protecting religious minorities, then you need justify that for all religions minorities instead of just cherry picking the ones you don't like.
Nice cherry picking going on here.
As mentioned, there is no religious requirement that stipulates that Muslim wear any form of clothing that covers their body in the manner that a niquab, burka, etc cover.
You don't like hearing that reality, and hence ignore it, because it fully undermines your entire argument of religious freedom.
That said, you don't like the example of freedoms related to firearms, as it also undermines your
'I am doing it in the name of freedom' schtick.
How about the polygamous communities that involve the marriage of some crusty old bastard to multiple women and teenage girls... They claim it's about religion... Does this mean that you support that practice as it is fighting the good fight for women's freedoms?
Hilarious, not only is that what you're doing, but have also perverted it into an argument for 'women's freedoms'
Really sad man.. Just cause Justine has hitched his wagon to this losing horse, doesn't mean that you have to sell your soul too
