Amazing how even the video you posted shows the top of the berm being hit. But you can't supply a photo of that area....have a good look at the lawn
Oh ya, that would hurt your argument...
:lol:
Amazing how even the video you posted shows the top of the berm being hit. But you can't supply a photo of that area....have a good look at the lawn
Wow, goodthing that plane was going up hill when in that pic.http://criticalthrash.com/terror/P1010017.JPG
what it should look like after a crash
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/fdx1478/2.shtml
Amazing how even the video you posted shows the top of the berm being hit. But you can't supply a photo of that area....
Oh ya, that would hurt your argument...
:lol:
Wow, goodthing that plane was going up hill when in that pic.
I wonder what would happen if it hit the top of the hill it's resting on, on it's way into the ground...
Oh ya, it would bounce and leave an untouched spot before it came back down. Kinda like what happened at the Pentagon. Only there was a Pentagon right where the plane came down.
I know this takes a lot of critical thought to collate, but it ain't that hard.
Again, I'm not the one making the claim, you are and you are using bullshyte pic's to support your delusions. If you want me to believe a missile hit the Penatgon, show me the top of the berm.You make a picture of it then stop winging...!!! if you got proof prove it, don't keep asking me to do YOUR work matey,was i there to take a picture no i wasnt, i can only use the ones given or do screen shot same as you ...!.so find me the picture you got or shut up.
Of course it is, you can't prove me wrong, so it must be 'bollocks'. Which I'm sure your're on a steady diet of.;-)BOLLOCKS
I know this takes a lot of critical thought to collate, but it ain't that hard.
Yes, I can see now what you were trying to say.BOLLOCKS
That's a matter of perception, not fact.
I would agree, I have long held the belief that events such as then ones you have sighted, were allowed to happen, to justify military acts.
Note my choice of words...'allowed to happen'. Not made to happen, not participated in. But the foreknowledge thereof and subsequent complicity, in allowing to take place.
But the absurdity of the notion, that the WTC was a controlled demolition, is behold belief.
But when one sees a glaring falsehood, they should take steps to make known the truth. Which is based on fact, not supposition, assumption and innuendo.
Again, perception...are you following me here?
It's a gif of a CCTV capture.
For the love of gawd!!!
Where?Unseen Pentagon Footage FOUR WTC 911 (wnplus)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=869bO4jI1po
lovely lawn footage no marks unbelievable undamaged lawn