Why are tea baggers white?

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
The blacks who voted for Obama are perfectly and accurately represented and illustrated by the woman in post #416.

Those blacks who could see even an inch further than the tip of their noses voted for the best candidate, not strictly and blindly on skin colour. They are the ones who managed to see Obama for the totally unqualified fraud that he is. They are the ones in the Tea Party Movement.

The pitifully misguided ones (like the woman in post #416) will realize that the rent, the grocery, the car payment, the kids education etc. will NOT be paid by Obama, sooner or later.

Just watch the number of blacks in the Tea Party growing.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
The blacks who voted for Obama are perfectly and accurately represented and illustrated by the woman in post #416.

Those blacks who could see even an inch further than the tip of their noses voted for the best candidate, not strictly and blindly on skin colour. They are the ones who managed to see Obama for the totally unqualified fraud that he is. They are the ones in the Tea Party Movement.

The pitifully misguided ones (like the woman in post #416) will realize that the rent, the grocery, the car payment, the kids education etc. will NOT be paid by Obama, sooner or later.

Just watch the number of blacks in the Tea Party growing.

You wish. That has been the fond hope fo Republican party, to attract more blacks and not be known as party of racists, party which supports racism. It is a vain hope, blacks dislike Tea Party even more than they dislike Republican Party.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
YukonJack

Unfortunately it would seem you are calling this one accurately as the days go on.

I believe many of the black voters were campaigned for by the Acorn Groups who gave out information which was never published nor validated by either party - the primary purpose was voter registration and a guaranteed vote for Obama.

Interference in the information during that campaign led me to believe there would be charges against some of the members of that group (Acorn) but to date I have not seen nor heard of any - perhaps being kept at the State level and in
confidential hearings.

It doesn't take much to "influence" one who wants to believe so desperately.... and while I detest the man myself I dislike seeing so many hopeful people now begin to realize how they were taken for a ride.

Good representation needs to have "homework" and "honest information gathering" done - not messages based in lies and promises which would never be kept.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
"You wish. That has been the fond hope fo Republican party, to attract more blacks and not be known as party of racists, party which supports racism. It is a vain hope, blacks dislike Tea Party even more than they dislike Republican Party."

As the old saying goes, you can lead a dumb animal to the water, but you can not make it drink.

Hey, Y.J.- Is there any point in giving a person the time of day who is so presumptuous as to decide what other people like or dislike. Like if we really cared we could always go and ask a bunch of them..................................:lol::lol::lol: and get an accurate answer...............:lol::lol::lol:
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
JLM, one may get a good laugh from something totally unexpected - which is the heart and soul of good comedy - or from someting totally EXPECTED and predictable.

Like the the fact that Jonathan Leibovitz (aka Jon Stewart) can not say anything without shouting, like the fact that Bill Maher can not EVER have a show without desparaging people's faith, like the fact that any and all small-minded mental midgets can not get through their days without bad-mouthing Sarah Palin and her family.

And - more pertaining to this forum - the fact that We will always see the same nonsense, such as "spawn of the Devil", "Joan of Arc" etc. regurgitated from the usual left-wing sewer.

Always good for a laugh.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"So you think blacks are dumb? A typical Republican, conservative, Tea Party response."

In my opinion those blacks who still insist that Lincoln was Republican, yes, they are dumb. Those blacks who think Robert Byrd, the KKK Grand Wizard is cool, yes, they are dumb. Those who blacks who buy into the nonsense that a Democratic President will end all real and percieved injustices towards them, yes, they are dumb. Those who after all these years still believe that charlatans like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are saviors and not poverty pimps, yes, they are dumb. The blacks who think like the lady on the video in post #416, yes, they are dumb. The blacks who don't realize that no Democratic administration, EVER, respected blacks by promoting them to high positions, such as Secretary of State, as the Bush Administration, yes, they are dumb. And yes, those blacks who voted for OhBummer strictly and only because of skin colour, yes, they are dumb.

Well at least you finally learned to show some respect and did not call people you could not hold a candle to or kiss their feet 'tea baggers".

Maybe there is hope for you.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
"So you think blacks are dumb? A typical Republican, conservative, Tea Party response."

In my opinion those blacks who still insist that Lincoln was Republican, yes, they are dumb. Those blacks who think Robert Byrd, the KKK Grand Wizard is cool, yes, they are dumb. Those who blacks who buy into the nonsense that a Democratic President will end all real and percieved injustices towards them, yes, they are dumb. Those who after all these years still believe that charlatans like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are saviors and not poverty pimps, yes, they are dumb. The blacks who think like the lady on the video in post #416, yes, they are dumb. The blacks who don't realize that no Democratic administration, EVER, respected blacks by promoting them to high positions, such as Secretary of State, as the Bush Administration, yes, they are dumb. And yes, those blacks who voted for OhBummer strictly and only because of skin colour, yes, they are dumb.

Well at least you finally learned to show some respect and did not call people you could not hold a candle to or kiss their feet 'tea baggers".

Maybe there is hope for you.


Was there ever any doubt about Lincoln being a Republican?
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"Was there ever any doubt about Lincoln being a Republican?"

Of course not. My mistake! In my haste to post I somehow ommitted the word "NOT" between the words 'was' and 'Republican'.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Opposition to Obama not about race

April 11th, 2010, 12:00 am · 4 Comments · posted by Thomas J. Lucente Jr.


Let’s set the record straight once and for all.
There still appears to be some (many?) liberals out there making the baseless and completely irresponsible claim that opposition to President Barack Obama is, at least in part, based on race.
Hogwash!
I oppose the Obama regime and, like most libertarians and conservatives, it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with his dangerous and wholly un-American policies.
Claims that opposition to Obama is based on race say more about the claimant than those of us who are informed enough to realize that Obama is bad for America.
In fact, those making the claims, and you know who you are, are the true racists in the equation. Such claims demonstrate an inability to emancipate oneself from the chains of racial identity. Those people are mired in 19th century thought while living in a 21st century world.
It seems in America today, the only people dwelling on race are the very ones who claim to want racial equality. Meanwhile, those of us who find race irrelevant are the ones being called racists.
Liberals claim to want racial equality, yet they take every opportunity to bring race into the national dialogue regardless of its relevance.
Yes, there are individuals in the world who hate blacks because they are black. There are also those who hate Jews because they are Jews, Catholics because they are Catholic, and whites because they are white.
However, they are a miniscule minority of the more than 300 million Americans.
That we have a biracial president is proof positive that blacks today have all the same opportunities afforded whites.
If we want to talk about racism, let’s consider the plight of Italian-Americans. There are countless television advertisements parodying Italian-Americans and playing on stereotypes, usually centered on some insinuation concerning a criminal syndicate. Do I even have to mention the television show “Jersey Shore”?
Can you imagine such television shows and commercials capitalizing on black stereotypes?
Since taking office, Obama has apologized to more than 3 billion people worldwide for past American behavior. Yet, the apologizer in chief has not apologized to Italian-Americans for their treatment during World War II when more than 600,000 were declared enemy aliens and thousands arrested.
The U.S. government apologized to Japanese-Americans, and even gave surviving detainees $20,000 each, but that apology and payment did not apply to Italian-Americans or, for that matter, German-Americans.
I am, of course, being partially facetious here to point out how ridiculous these racial claims are. In the end, we are all related. Every human living today has a common female ancestor (Mitochondrial Eve) who lived 200,000 years ago in East Africa and a common male ancestor (Y-chromosomal Adam) who lived 90,000 years ago, also in Africa.
In a sense, we are all Africans.
Seriously, though, these accusations of racism from the left are unfounded and a sign of a weak mind.
There are many blacks who oppose Obama and there are many blacks in the tea party movement, a common target of racial accusations by the left.
There is absolutely no reason to resort to race as a reason to reject the Obama regime. Obama gives us many other reasons.
For example, his unconstitutional confiscation of the health care system using parliamentary tricks when he didn’t have enough votes. Then there is his constant need to apologize for America to foreign audiences.
Obama has run up record deficits instituting his irresponsible and destructive fiscal policies to expand America’s welfare entitlement state. He has mortgaged our great-grandchildren’s futures so he can hand out goodies such as substandard health care to Americans at some future time.
Despite all the evidence that lowering taxes increases economic growth, Obama continues to ignore that economic truism and push for higher taxes, especially against those he considers “rich.”
I could go on and on as to why I oppose Obama. Missing from that long list is his skin color.
So all you liberals, especially the ones who are well-educated (such as college professors and NAACP attorneys), stop calling us racists for holding true to our philosophical compasses in opposing Obama’s wrongheaded and foolish policies. There are better things about which to argue.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Here in the most liberal state of Massachusetts the Liberal Democrats have always done their best and often times successful to marginalize the African American communities.

The most powerful man in the state the House Speaker, who was a liberal Democrat Tom Finneran pleaded guilty to a felony of attempting to gerrymander a growing African American community out of his buddies district another liberal Democrat. The Feds busted him.

And the People's Republic of Cambridge, an ultra Liberal city in Massachusetts successfully blocked a school for African American youths in Harvard Square.

As liberal talk show host Margerie Eagan said...

"All Liberals love the little black children...until they want to build a school in their neighborhood."

Democrats have always been racist to the core. They throw money at them to get their votes and keep them in poverty. That is the only reason why they vote democrat.

And rabble rousers like Sharpton had the nerve to go to Arizona and march with the Latinos. Why? Because he is afraid of them. Latinos and the African American community do not get along and the Latinos will be the majority someday so men like Sharpton will depend upon them for his meal ticket.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Here in the most liberal state of Massachusetts the Liberal Democrats have always done their best and often times successful to marginalize the African American communities.

The most powerful man in the state the House Speaker, who was a liberal Democrat Tom Finneran pleaded guilty to a felony of attempting to gerrymander a growing African American community out of his buddies district another liberal Democrat. The Feds busted him.

And the People's Republic of Cambridge, an ultra Liberal city in Massachusetts successfully blocked a school for African American youths in Harvard Square.

As liberal talk show host Margerie Eagan said...

"All Liberals love the little black children...until they want to build a school in their neighborhood."

Democrats have always been racist to the core. They throw money at them to get their votes and keep them in poverty. That is the only reason why they vote democrat.

And rabble rousers like Sharpton had the nerve to go to Arizona and march with the Latinos. Why? Because he is afraid of them. Latinos and the African American community do not get along and the Latinos will be the majority someday so men like Sharpton will depend upon them for his meal ticket.

I am not interested in what happens in Massachusetts, EagleSmack. You gave a right wing perspective of it and you are welcome to it. And I certainly won’t take your word for it.

Looking at it nationally, blacks evidently consider Republicans to be racist, since they vote against Republicans in overwhelming numbers. It is not the Democrats who have a problem with blacks, it is the Republicans. A lot of opposition to Obama is racially motivated.

As to Arizona, Republicans there have offended the Hispanic community big time. That can only work to the advantage of Democrats. If McCain wins the primary (and it is by no means certain, his teabagger opponent may well win), he may have a difficult time getting reelected. I understand he usually gets a large percentage of Hispanic vote (a rare occurrence for a Republican). It wouldn’t surprise me if they vote Democratic this time around.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
A question to SirJosephPorter: At all the times you attended performances of operettas by Gilbert & Sullivan, how many of those in attendance were NOT white?

I am willing to bet that the number of blacks at any Tea Party is WAY higher than the number of blacks at any Gilbert & Sullivan event.

Like you would say: What has that got to do with anything?

Simple answer: Different strokes for different folks. And only those who are desparate to make point where no point is to be made bring up the same question, relentlessly, time after time as you do about the shortage of African-Americans at Tea Parties.

Perhaps you should ask people like Dr. Thomas Sowell, Ken Backwell, Condolleezza Rice, Justice Clerance Thomas, Larry Elder or The Annointed One Himself, Hussain OhBummer.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
"It is all over the news about Latino Americans and their distaste for Obama."


President Barack Obama enjoys a higher approval rating among Hispanics than among the general electorate, according to a new poll, but these voters could stay away from the polls in November if they feel there is little progress on immigration legislation.
The poll was commissioned by America's Voice, an immigrant-advocacy group that strongly supports overhauling immigration legislation. It was conducted by Bendixen & Amandi, an independent polling firm specializing in multicultural and multilingual political and market research, which has worked for Democratic candidates.
According to the findings, 65% of Hispanic voters said the president is doing an "excellent" or "good" job. Only one-third, or 33%, said his performance was "mediocre" or "poor."







Poll Notes Concern Among Hispanic Voters of Obama's Handling of Immigration - WSJ.com




You were saying ...
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,457
8,072
113
B.C.
0polls say lots goober
but pols neither put food on your table or keep undesirables out of your kitchen.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
"Like I said... just because Latino's aren't white...doesn't mean they're black."

While I agree with 99% of what you say, I'd like to point out that Latinos ARE white.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
A question to SirJosephPorter: At all the times you attended performances of operettas by Gilbert & Sullivan, how many of those in attendance were NOT white?

I am willing to bet that the number of blacks at any Tea Party is WAY higher than the number of blacks at any Gilbert & Sullivan event.

Like you would say: What has that got to do with anything?

Simple answer: Different strokes for different folks. And only those who are desparate to make point where no point is to be made bring up the same question, relentlessly, time after time as you do about the shortage of African-Americans at Tea Parties.

Perhaps you should ask people like Dr. Thomas Sowell, Ken Backwell, Condolleezza Rice, Justice Clerance Thomas, Larry Elder or The Annointed One Himself, Hussain OhBummer.

You are comparing G & S with Tea Party? Get real. G & S is purely entertainment, it doesn’t matter what demographics participate in it. It may matter to the organizers. If they know what kind of audience they are getting, they will advertise in the mediums (magazines, websites etc.) which are frequented by that demographics (whites, older people etc.). But there is no reason for them to try to attract blacks, minorities etc.

Politics however, is totally different. When a group has very few blacks, one has to wonder who is representing the interest of blacks in the Tae Party, whether their policies are likely to be hostile to blacks. Same as the Republican Party. The are very few blacks in the Republican Party, so their policies end up hurting blacks most of the time.

For an entertainment group such as G & S, it matters not in the least if it is patronized exclusively by whites (and it is). For a political group, it is a huge big deal.