When you reach the age of reason, will you reject supernatural religion?
- Thread starter French Patriot
- Start date
Hitch-hiker?? WTHell is the rest of the herd??
Does that mean it is an oral or suppository med. or either works?? AnallyInsertedDeathSentence is another option but it takes a long time.
Why does yours come in a caliber number?
Does that mean it is an oral or suppository med. or either works?? AnallyInsertedDeathSentence is another option but it takes a long time.
I did. A good scientific education is pretty corrosive to religious belief.
Really?? So you advocate having children and then letting them do whatever they want with zero consequences and breaking the rules has no consequences?? Sounds like fun if you advocate the one with the biggest stick has the most to say, that about sum it up?
Morality?? Like this??
Re:21:3-7:
And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying,
Behold,
the tabernacle of God is with men,
and he will dwell with them,
and they shall be his people,
and God himself shall be with them,
and be their God.
And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes;
and there shall be no more death,
neither sorrow,
nor crying,
neither shall there be any more pain:
for the former things are passed away.
And he that sat upon the throne said,
Behold,
I make all things new.
And he said unto me,
Write:
for these words are true and faithful.
And he said unto me,
It is done.
I am Alpha and Omega,
the beginning and the end.
I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
He that overcometh shall inherit all things;
and I will be his God,
and he shall be my son.
Isa:65:17-25:
For,
behold,
I create new heavens and a new earth:
and the former shall not be remembered,
nor come into mind.
But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create:
for,
behold,
I create Jerusalem a rejoicing,
and her people a joy.
And I will rejoice in Jerusalem,
and joy in my people:
and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her,
nor the voice of crying.
There shall be no more thence an infant of days,
nor an old man that hath not filled his days:
for the child shall die an hundred years old;
but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.
And they shall build houses,
and inhabit them;
and they shall plant vineyards,
and eat the fruit of them.
They shall not build,
and another inhabit;
they shall not plant,
and another eat:
for as the days of a tree are the days of my people,
and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
They shall not labour in vain,
nor bring forth for trouble;
for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD,
and their offspring with them.
And it shall come to pass,
that before they call,
I will answer;
and while they are yet speaking,
I will hear.
The wolf and the lamb shall feed together,
and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock:
and dust shall be the serpent's meat.
They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain,
saith the LORD.
That small reference show that the book does have a happy ending for everybody who has ever lived on planet earth. That can only mean you have never read it, you read it and couldn't understand it or you are just a troll out looking for a victim while getting moral support from somebody who is supposed to be somewhat intelligent. Too bad he let it slip that he is a scientist as that group is 10X more controlled than any religious person. They are in the realm that goes by the single, if you are getting rich then you say what you are told to say and then you shut the fuk up. Only a scientist in denial would claim their industry is untouched by massive corruption.
You are certainly no scientist and from what you post from the book you hate so much your knowledge base seems pretty small. It is like you read the first page of every book and now claim to know all that is those chapters when it takes 2 seconds to show your theory is full of shit.
Please carry on though.
[youtube]1V-qjxvgo9A&t=55s[/youtube]
How about an scientific explanation to this article as it is a truthful one.
Smithsonian Admits to Destruction of Thousands of Giant Human Skeletons in Early 1900’s – World News Daily Report
A US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900’s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time.
The allegations stemming from the American Institution of Alternative Archeology (AIAA) that the Smithsonian Institution had destroyed thousands of giant human remains during the early 1900’s was not taken lightly by the Smithsonian who responded by suing the organization for defamation and trying to damage the reputation of the 168-year old institution.
During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several Smithsonian whistle blowers admitted to the existence of documents that allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream archeology can not admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA spokesman, James Churward.
Morality?? Like this??
Re:21:3-7:
And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying,
Behold,
the tabernacle of God is with men,
and he will dwell with them,
and they shall be his people,
and God himself shall be with them,
and be their God.
And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes;
and there shall be no more death,
neither sorrow,
nor crying,
neither shall there be any more pain:
for the former things are passed away.
And he that sat upon the throne said,
Behold,
I make all things new.
And he said unto me,
Write:
for these words are true and faithful.
And he said unto me,
It is done.
I am Alpha and Omega,
the beginning and the end.
I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
He that overcometh shall inherit all things;
and I will be his God,
and he shall be my son.
Isa:65:17-25:
For,
behold,
I create new heavens and a new earth:
and the former shall not be remembered,
nor come into mind.
But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create:
for,
behold,
I create Jerusalem a rejoicing,
and her people a joy.
And I will rejoice in Jerusalem,
and joy in my people:
and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her,
nor the voice of crying.
There shall be no more thence an infant of days,
nor an old man that hath not filled his days:
for the child shall die an hundred years old;
but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.
And they shall build houses,
and inhabit them;
and they shall plant vineyards,
and eat the fruit of them.
They shall not build,
and another inhabit;
they shall not plant,
and another eat:
for as the days of a tree are the days of my people,
and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
They shall not labour in vain,
nor bring forth for trouble;
for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD,
and their offspring with them.
And it shall come to pass,
that before they call,
I will answer;
and while they are yet speaking,
I will hear.
The wolf and the lamb shall feed together,
and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock:
and dust shall be the serpent's meat.
They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain,
saith the LORD.
That small reference show that the book does have a happy ending for everybody who has ever lived on planet earth. That can only mean you have never read it, you read it and couldn't understand it or you are just a troll out looking for a victim while getting moral support from somebody who is supposed to be somewhat intelligent. Too bad he let it slip that he is a scientist as that group is 10X more controlled than any religious person. They are in the realm that goes by the single, if you are getting rich then you say what you are told to say and then you shut the fuk up. Only a scientist in denial would claim their industry is untouched by massive corruption.
You are certainly no scientist and from what you post from the book you hate so much your knowledge base seems pretty small. It is like you read the first page of every book and now claim to know all that is those chapters when it takes 2 seconds to show your theory is full of shit.
Please carry on though.
Have you ever met somebody like that yet. From the bit I know about your scientific training it goes out the window as soon as some hard questions are put on the table. Like you dodge the topic of the expanding earth you also dodge supply any in-depth scientific explanation for how the items in this vid were made considering mankind was one step out of the trees when these items were made. You won't reply with an answer but it will be a dodge that is more of an attack that suggests the question shouldn't be considered or answered in an adult like fashion.
[youtube]1V-qjxvgo9A&t=55s[/youtube]
How about an scientific explanation to this article as it is a truthful one.
Smithsonian Admits to Destruction of Thousands of Giant Human Skeletons in Early 1900’s – World News Daily Report
A US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900’s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time.
The allegations stemming from the American Institution of Alternative Archeology (AIAA) that the Smithsonian Institution had destroyed thousands of giant human remains during the early 1900’s was not taken lightly by the Smithsonian who responded by suing the organization for defamation and trying to damage the reputation of the 168-year old institution.
During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several Smithsonian whistle blowers admitted to the existence of documents that allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream archeology can not admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA spokesman, James Churward.
«There has been a major cover up by western archaeological institutions since the early 1900’s to make us believe that America was first colonized by Asian peoples migrating through the Bering Strait 15,000 years ago, when in fact, there are hundreds of thousands of burial mounds all over America which the Natives claim were there a long time before them, and that show traces of a highly developed civilization, complex use of metal alloys and where giant human skeleton remains are frequently found but still go unreported in the media and news outlets» he explains.
lol, and that contributes what. other than showing you are a fuktard with no actual contribution to the thread except to support somebody who doesn't even know how the book ends. Too bad the political and scientific minds here as just as messed up.
BTW the trick is finding the right part to post.
BTW the trick is finding the right part to post.
I wasn't trying to validate the Bible, I was showing that science is as corrupt as politics, medicine and religion.
The Bible won't be validated until the events associated with the 7 trumps begin to unfold. You have invalidated it because it doesn't fit the timeline you want it to follow. At that time events like Moses was doing will again be happening. That will constitute proof for some. Most have to wait for the 7th trump before they clue in. Until then ignore all the hype as it has nothing to do with God, it has everything to do with money-changes. Do you even know who they are these days??
The Bible won't be validated until the events associated with the 7 trumps begin to unfold. You have invalidated it because it doesn't fit the timeline you want it to follow. At that time events like Moses was doing will again be happening. That will constitute proof for some. Most have to wait for the 7th trump before they clue in. Until then ignore all the hype as it has nothing to do with God, it has everything to do with money-changes. Do you even know who they are these days??
Have you even looked at the Hopi prophesies? We are in the final stages as most have already come to pass. Edgar Casey? Tibetan Buddhists? The works of James Churchward, Jane Roberts or Richard Alpert? There are a whole world of books that are recent and more valid than an ancient text that has been corrupted by thousands of years of human mistranslation, misinterpretation, greed and power mongering.
Those and a few others. How did you not conclude that the similar ends all have Jeremiah:25 as a commonality?
Jer:25:15:
For thus saith the LORD God of Israel unto me;
Take the wine cup of this fury at my hand,
and cause all the nations,
to whom I send thee,
to drink it.
Jer:25:16:
And they shall drink,
and be moved,
and be mad,
because of the sword that I will send among them.
For thus saith the LORD God of Israel unto me;
Take the wine cup of this fury at my hand,
and cause all the nations,
to whom I send thee,
to drink it.
Jer:25:16:
And they shall drink,
and be moved,
and be mad,
because of the sword that I will send among them.
You just mentioned morality as post ago, no need to go any further than that. The part I posted is how the book ends, care to explain the immorality that is shown in the verses? If you can't then that sort of means the ending is not something you even considered before evaluating what God is all about? You do the same shit here that you do on the David I.site so your path is anything but one connected to spiritual enlightenment. I never could understand why no quoting from the Bible was allowed other than the words make too much sense to be allowed as it was a Bible trashing place alone rather than it being a place where religious roots can be explored.
I'm not your entertainment committee so fuk off and you your own leg work. Oh wait if you could do that you wouldn't be the mess you are today.
To show your lack of reading comprehension I was slamming the David I. site rather than your trolling ways. You request is now going to be at levels you can understand if you study the words for a few weeks. How do you like the softer gentler side of me??
M'r:11:22:
And Jesus answering saith unto them,
Have faith in God.
1Co:4:20:
For the kingdom of God is not in word,
but in power.
To show your lack of reading comprehension I was slamming the David I. site rather than your trolling ways. You request is now going to be at levels you can understand if you study the words for a few weeks. How do you like the softer gentler side of me??
M'r:11:22:
And Jesus answering saith unto them,
Have faith in God.
1Co:4:20:
For the kingdom of God is not in word,
but in power.
Gnostic Christian Jesus said, "If those who attract you say, 'See, the Kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you.
If they say to you, 'It is under the earth,' then the fish of the sea will precede you.
Rather, the Kingdom of God is inside of you, and it is outside of you.
[Those who] become acquainted with [themselves] will find it; [and when you] become acquainted with yourselves, [you will understand that] it is you who are the sons of the living Father.
But if you will not know yourselves, you dwell in poverty and it is you who are that poverty."
Regards
DL
That's because the earth isn't expanding. I generally choose not to discuss topics that are scientifically illiterate nonsense with people who haven't the slightest understanding of what science is, how it works, and what it claims. And that also explains other topics you claim I dodge; there's just nothing worth talking about in them, and it's a waste of time and energy to correct all the errors of fact and judgment people offer about them. They'll never be convinced anyway, attempts to do so just strengthen their false convictions. It's called cognitive dissonance, you can look it up, it's pretty well documented.
See, I told you you would mess up even the shortest of verses. The book is the word of God. It contains knowledge about God and what God has in store for this earth and the whole time it exists. You do not experience things literally when you read about them. You can read about the bruise to the heel and nothing happens to you. If your name was Jesus about 2,000 years ago it would be the cause of your literal death.
You seem to be quite determined to remain in disbelief and that doesn't hold any consequences at the moment. Nor does it hold any should you give up the Ghost before the return happens it won't help or hurt you as that is a period of dreamless sleep. I profess to have an almost unique understanding of the book and you have known me long enough to be able to determine if that is true or not based on what you have already read. That I profess my belief should mean I should be one of the ones who could survive the trumps and the vials and be alive for the 1,000 year reign based on that statement of faith.
What about you should you make it to the morning the 7th trump sounds, will you still be alive after the few hours it takes for the vials to be poured out is a question you might ask yourself considering our summation of the book is quite different. I find it easy to find the parts that allow me to end up being supportive in the long run while you are not at all supportive of what is clearly a happy ending. Nor do you seem to be able find anything in your version of the Bible that is worth posting at all really. You should be a little jealous, here I am, a hick from the back-country of AB and by doing a lot of reading in the Bible and a little chatting with various people over a number of decades something that you would give your eye-teeth for, yet there you are, an almost unbeliever stuck in a world where religion is a major topic. I'm having a blast and I feel no compulsion to visit your threads as part of my show of faith. You cannot say the same so you are already agenda driven while I am taking part because it is about the author of a book that I find to be pretty amazing.
So amazing I can even explain why.
BTW the answer is you would still be alive, not all witnesses are in the front row and their stories would be the most riveting during that time where all are purified the same at the same time. The book of life records names at the time of conception and it is for all flesh rather than just the flesh of men. The book has a few pages read when it is opened in Re:10 after the vials have killed all sinners and the resurrection of the whole House of Israel will begin. The gate is narrow and if all people pass through that same gate then it doesn't matter a hell of a lot what the path that gets you there looks like. Only one is straight and He died a few hours before Passover began in 30AD, Jerusalem time. That would be where you should be if you want to see the actual arrival, my guidebook points to a different path and it has me entering from the east at about the Dead Sea location. That will be when I and many other Gentiles will be doing what Jesus did in the 40 days after John baptized Him in the River Jordan and what the ones in the room started the night Jesus came back for 40 days after He had been glorified by God.
Are you feeling persecuted for you current level of belief yet. Think of the ones that think they know it all, they will still enter the 1,000 years as a little child compared what they will know when they witness God sends Satan and the fallen angels to the fiery lake. As you would be equal to being an angel and Christ brings you through the same fire that destroyed Satan's Babylon and Sodom in the OT which is where God showed Christ how to use the fire.
In the letters to the the 7 Churches there are people on both sides of the aisle, all will leave the building as believers, there are no extra points for staying on the 'need to overcome' longer than you have to. Being there on the day the 7th trumps means you get to say your good-byes to Satan before he has his chains unlocked and is released from the Pit. With the chains and a locked gate between the two what sort of comments would the person be saying to a lying angel that is powerless at the worst possible time.
Perhaps the problem is the book or maybe you just aren't a spiritual person. Any Bible should work, in the verse below are the punishments the same? I would say 'no' and even my fav edition of the book uses the lesser term for both while the other version indicates the one to the head is more severe that the one to the heel.
Ge:3
15 Y schal sette enemytees bitwixe thee and the womman,
and bitwixe thi seed and hir seed;
sche schal breke thin heed,
and thou schalt sette aspies to hir heele.
You seem to be quite determined to remain in disbelief and that doesn't hold any consequences at the moment. Nor does it hold any should you give up the Ghost before the return happens it won't help or hurt you as that is a period of dreamless sleep. I profess to have an almost unique understanding of the book and you have known me long enough to be able to determine if that is true or not based on what you have already read. That I profess my belief should mean I should be one of the ones who could survive the trumps and the vials and be alive for the 1,000 year reign based on that statement of faith.
What about you should you make it to the morning the 7th trump sounds, will you still be alive after the few hours it takes for the vials to be poured out is a question you might ask yourself considering our summation of the book is quite different. I find it easy to find the parts that allow me to end up being supportive in the long run while you are not at all supportive of what is clearly a happy ending. Nor do you seem to be able find anything in your version of the Bible that is worth posting at all really. You should be a little jealous, here I am, a hick from the back-country of AB and by doing a lot of reading in the Bible and a little chatting with various people over a number of decades something that you would give your eye-teeth for, yet there you are, an almost unbeliever stuck in a world where religion is a major topic. I'm having a blast and I feel no compulsion to visit your threads as part of my show of faith. You cannot say the same so you are already agenda driven while I am taking part because it is about the author of a book that I find to be pretty amazing.
So amazing I can even explain why.
BTW the answer is you would still be alive, not all witnesses are in the front row and their stories would be the most riveting during that time where all are purified the same at the same time. The book of life records names at the time of conception and it is for all flesh rather than just the flesh of men. The book has a few pages read when it is opened in Re:10 after the vials have killed all sinners and the resurrection of the whole House of Israel will begin. The gate is narrow and if all people pass through that same gate then it doesn't matter a hell of a lot what the path that gets you there looks like. Only one is straight and He died a few hours before Passover began in 30AD, Jerusalem time. That would be where you should be if you want to see the actual arrival, my guidebook points to a different path and it has me entering from the east at about the Dead Sea location. That will be when I and many other Gentiles will be doing what Jesus did in the 40 days after John baptized Him in the River Jordan and what the ones in the room started the night Jesus came back for 40 days after He had been glorified by God.
Are you feeling persecuted for you current level of belief yet. Think of the ones that think they know it all, they will still enter the 1,000 years as a little child compared what they will know when they witness God sends Satan and the fallen angels to the fiery lake. As you would be equal to being an angel and Christ brings you through the same fire that destroyed Satan's Babylon and Sodom in the OT which is where God showed Christ how to use the fire.
In the letters to the the 7 Churches there are people on both sides of the aisle, all will leave the building as believers, there are no extra points for staying on the 'need to overcome' longer than you have to. Being there on the day the 7th trumps means you get to say your good-byes to Satan before he has his chains unlocked and is released from the Pit. With the chains and a locked gate between the two what sort of comments would the person be saying to a lying angel that is powerless at the worst possible time.
Perhaps the problem is the book or maybe you just aren't a spiritual person. Any Bible should work, in the verse below are the punishments the same? I would say 'no' and even my fav edition of the book uses the lesser term for both while the other version indicates the one to the head is more severe that the one to the heel.
Ge:3
15 Y schal sette enemytees bitwixe thee and the womman,
and bitwixe thi seed and hir seed;
sche schal breke thin heed,
and thou schalt sette aspies to hir heele.